Skip to main content
Log in

Dasein Versus Design: The Problematics of Turning Making Into Thinking

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Building on suggestions from the work of Martin Heidegger, a distinction is made between two ways of being in the world. One is associated with the unplanned particularity and care of Dasein, another with the planning and thinking-out of design; the former is characteristic of a more traditional way of life, the latter of contemporary life. Included are brief etymologies of `Dasein' and `design', along with some reflections on the two-fold history of design of internal structure and surface appearance (that is, of engineering and aesthetic design, respectively). The conclusion sketches out a problematics of engineering design as involving a disengagement from fundamental human experience, and suggests the need to discriminate between authenticity and inauthenticity in the world of design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Hayek, F.A.: 1967, 'The Results of Human Action But Not of Human Design', in F.A. Hayek (ed.), Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1927, Sein und Zeit. English versions: Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, Harper & Row, New York, 1962; Being and Time, trans. Joan Stambaugh, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickam, H.H. Jr.: 1998, Rocket Boys: A Memoir, Delacorte, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S.: 1980 [1849], The Sickness unto Death: A Christian Psychological Exposition for Upbuilding and Awakening, trans. H.V. Hong and E.H. Hong, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. First published, 1849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundera, M.: 1984, The Unbearable Lightness of Being, trans. M.H. Heim, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms: 1994, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

  • Mitcham, C.: 1994, 'Engineering Design Research and Social Responsibility', in K.S. Shrader-Frechette (ed.), Ethics of Scientific Research, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C.: forthcoming, 'On Character and Technology', in A. Light & D. Strong (eds.), Technology and the Good Life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Riessen, H. van: 1949, Filosofie en techniek [Philosophy and Technology], J.H. Kok, Kampen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, K.: 1996, 21st-Century Jet: The Making and Marketing of the Boeing 777, Scribner's, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck, R.: 1996, Forbidden Knowledge: From Prometheus to Pornography, St. Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1968, The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2nd ed., 1981; 3rd ed., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparke, P.: 1986, An Introduction to Design and Culture in the Twentieth Century, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlot, Ad: forthcoming, 'Toward a Juridical Turn for the Ethics of Technology? An Aerospace Case', in P. Kroes (ed.), The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology, Research in Philosophy and Technology.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitcham, C. Dasein Versus Design: The Problematics of Turning Making Into Thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11, 27–36 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011282121513

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011282121513

Navigation