Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Performance of Chinese Commercial Banks: Analysis, Findings and Policy Implications

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the financial performance of Chinesebanks by using financial ratio analysis. The analysis shows that the lowprofitability of state-owned commercial banks results from their higherratio for non-interest expenses and lower interest margin thanjoint-equity banks. The much lower profit margin in state-owned banksdraws down their levels of ROE and ROA, even with the offsetting effectsof more efficient utilization of their assets and higher financialleverage. Although data limitations prevent us from studying the riskprofiles of the banks in detail, it is clear that these Chinese banksgenerated lower returns with higher financial risks than their Westerncounterparts. The paper concludes with a discussion of major issuesaffecting Chinese bank performance. Significant difficulties encounteredin assessing bank performance are also identified anddiscussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • China Finance Association, Beijing, China, Almanac of China's Finance and Banking, October, (1998).

  • Moody's Investors Service, “Banking System Outlook: China,” August, (1999).

  • Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, Royal Bank of Canada Annual Report, 1998.

  • Shang, Min, New China Finance 50 Years (in Chinese), China Finance and Economics Publishing Co., 2000.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, S., Liu, F., Liu, S. et al. Comparative Performance of Chinese Commercial Banks: Analysis, Findings and Policy Implications. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 16, 149–170 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011227125218

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011227125218

Navigation