Abstract
Modern university presidents lack the stature and standing their predecessors enjoyed, or so it appears. Critics and defenders alike--even presidents and former presidents--seem to agree with this proposition, albeit for different reasons. Critics note that presidents today exhibit a career orientation, moving frequently from institution to institution, with the result that presidential tenure continues to decline at a relatively rapid pace. Given these increasingly brief terms, it should not cause surprise that presidents find it difficult to accomplish or even to define agendas. In addition, the critics claim that modern presidents either lack the authority or will to accomplish much of substance or that they avoid controversial issues both on and off campus. However, few commentators have conducted careful comparisons of earlier and modern presidents to establish the validity of the claim about the “shrinking college president.” This article seeks to evaluate the claim in a comparative and analytical context and to suggest a revised interpretation. Modern presidents tend to focus on their institutions rather than on higher education in general, by way of contrast to earlier presidents; and they spend more time on campus rather than on general societal concerns. That difference, however, appears to be dissipating because of new developments and new needs within the society at large.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berkowitz, P. (1999). Virtue and the making of modern liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, passim.
Bledstein, B. J. (1978). The culture of professionalism: The middle class and the development of higher education in America (esp. chapters 5-8). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Broad, M. C. (2000, Winter). Presidents and teacher education: Solving the puzzle. The President 3(1), 12-23.
Campus Compact (1999). Presidents' Fourth of July declaration on civic responsibility of higher education. Providence, RI: Brown University, passim. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2000, February 18), A50; and (2000, February 25), A-44-A45.
Dennison, G. M. (1999, November). The new agenda: Civic engagement. Address to a Meeting of the Pacific Cluster Executive Directors of Community Service and State Community Service Commission Members, San Diego, CA.
Die, A. H. (1999, Fall). Reflections on presidential longevity. The Presidency 2(3), 32-37.
Ellis, P. (1998, May-June). The management presidency according to AGB. Change 30, 44.
Fisher, J. L. (1991). The board and the president. New York: American Council on Education, MacMillan Co., passim.
Fisher, J. L. (2000, Winter). Captains in stormy waters. The Presidency 3(1), 33.
Fisher, J. L., & Koch, J. V. (1996). Presidential leadership: Making a difference. Phoenix: American Council on Education and Oryx Press, passim.
Fullinwider, R. K., (Ed.), (1999). Civil society, democracy, and civic renewal. London: Rowman & Littlefield, passim.
Greenberg, D. (1998, June 1). The shrinking college president: Small men on campus. The New Republic, 18-21. See also <http://ww.tnr.com/archive/0698/060198/ greenberg060198.html>.
Gaudiana, C. R. (1999, Winter). A call to social stewardship. The Presidency 2(1), 20-25.
Hahn, R. (1995, September-October). Getting serious about presidential leadership: Our collective responsibility. Change, 27, 12-20.
Ikenberry, S. O. (1998, Fall). From our president. The Presidency 1(2), 5-6.
Ikenberry, S. O. (1999, Winter). Past triumphs, future challenges: A conversation with Clark Kerr. The Presidency 2(1), 12-19.
Ikenberry, S. O. (2000, Winter) From our president: Will this time be different? The Presidency 3(1), 7-8.
Keller, G. (1999-2000, Winter). The emerging third stage of higher education planning. Planning for Higher Education 28(2), 1-7.
Keohane, N. O. (1998, Fall). More power to the president? The Presidency 1(2), 12-17.
Levine, A. (1998, January-February). Succeeding as a leader; failing as a president. Change, 30, 43-45.
Padilla, A., & Ghosh, S. (2000, Winter). Turnover at the top: The revolving door of the academic presidency. The Presidency 3(1), 30-37.
ACE profiles American college presidents (1998, Spring). The Presidency 1(1), 9.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: American's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
Putnam, R. (1999, July). Untitled presentation to Campus Compact Presidential Leadership Symposium, Aspen, Colorado.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: Civic disengagement in America. New York: Simon and Schuster, passim.
Rhodes, F. H. T. (1998, Spring). The art of the presidency. The Presidency 1(1), 12-18.
Rodd, M. & Green, M. F. (1998). The American college president: 1998 edition.Washington: American Council on Education, passim.
Rudenstine, N. L. (1996, April 19). Why a diverse student body is so important. The Chronicle of Higher Education, B1-B2.
Shaw, K. A. (1999). The successful president: “Buzzwords” on leadership. Phoenix: American Council on Education and The Oryx Press, passim.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dennison, G.M. Small Men on Campus: Modern University Presidents. Innovative Higher Education 25, 269–284 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011046623887
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011046623887