Negotiation Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 17–34 | Cite as

Resolving Conflict Across Languages

  • Raymond Cohen


English is increasingly used as an indispensable interlanguage, the commonthird language of non-native speakers, in international negotiations.In technical or commercial talks, where interlocutors share a stock ofexpert knowledge, semantic problems are relatively easily overcome. Inemotive and complex negotiations to resolve protracted international conflict,however, intriguing problems of interpretation arise. Though interlocutorsspeak in English, they are unlikely to think or work in English.Back home the political debate is conducted in the mother tongue. Thus thesemantic fields, the full range of meanings and connotations, of keyabstract concepts at the heart of the negotiation may not be conveyed intranslation. The ill-fated Syrian-Israeli peace talks are drawn upon to exemplifythe argument.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albright, M. 2000. Washington: U.S. Department of State transcript of Albright-Barak news conference, 28 June 2000.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, K. H. 1994. 'Umr. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.Google Scholar
  3. Antoun, R. T. 1997. Institutionalized deconfrontation: A case study of conflict resolution among tribal peasants in Jordan. In Conflict resolution in the Arab world, edited by P. Salem. Beirut: American University of Beirut.Google Scholar
  4. Asher, R.E., ed. 1994. The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  5. BBC-SWB, 1994a. BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 11 March 1994.Google Scholar
  6. ---. 1994b. 27 October 1994.Google Scholar
  7. ---. 1994c. 3 December 1994.Google Scholar
  8. ---. 1995a. 25 May 1995.Google Scholar
  9. ---. 1995b. 28 December 1995.Google Scholar
  10. ---. 2000a. 17 January 2000.Google Scholar
  11. ---. 2000b. 21 January 2000.Google Scholar
  12. ---. 2000c. 28 March 2000.Google Scholar
  13. CNN. 1996. Evans and Novak interview with President Hafiz al-Assad, 28 September 1996.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, J. B. 1956. Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Clinton, W. J. 2000. White House press conference, 29 March 2000.Google Scholar
  16. The encyclopedia of Islam. 1990. New edition, vol. iv. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  17. FBIS-NES. 2000a. Foreign Broadcast Information Service, Near East and South Asia. 20 January 2000.Google Scholar
  18. ---. 2000b. 12 February 2000.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, E. 1990. Lost in translation. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Irani, G. E. and N.C. Fink. 1998. Rituals of reconciliation: Arab-Islamic perspectives. Arab Studies Quarterly 20(4): 53-73.Google Scholar
  21. Irani, G. E. 1999. Islamic mediation techniques for Middle East conflicts. MERIA Journal, June.Google Scholar
  22. Liverani, M. 1983. Political lexicon and political ideologies in the Amarna Letters. Berytus 31(1): 41-56.Google Scholar
  23. Ma'ariv. 1996. Itamar Rabinovich interviewed by Tami Shalev, 12 January 1996.Google Scholar
  24. Mandelbaum, D.G. 1963. Selected writings of Edward Sapir on language, culture, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mastenbroek, W. 1999. Negotiation as emotion management. Theory, Culture & Society 16(4): 49-73.Google Scholar
  26. Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  27. Rabinovich, I. 1997. Damascus's version. Ma'ariv 28 February 1997.Google Scholar
  28. ---. 1998. Brink of peace. (Hebrew). Tel Aviv: Yediot Ahronot.Google Scholar
  29. Samet, G. 2000. No thanks, Assad. Ha'aretz 12 April 2000.Google Scholar
  30. Simpson, J.A. and E.S.C. Weiner, eds. 1989. The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Solomon, R. H. 1999. Chinese negotiating behavior. Washington: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  32. Steiner, G. 1992. After Babel: Aspects of language and translation, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Tractate Sanhedrin 5b, Babylonian Talmud.Google Scholar
  34. Yang, M. M. 1994. Gifts, favors, and banquets. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond Cohen
    • 1
  1. 1.International RelationsHebrew University of JerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations