Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 51, Issue 1–2, pp 15–22 | Cite as

Exhibiting the New Mussolinian City: Memories of empire in the World Exhibition of Rome (EUR)

  • Anna Notaro
Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show how fascist imperialist discourses were articulated in a new urban space, just on the outskirts of Rome, and how they affected its design, use and representation. This new city, which should have been the spatial expression of the regime's political, cultural and economical achievements, since its beginning was conceived almost as a mirror image of classical Rome. As her fascist alter-ego, it was imagined as the modern realisation of the ancient dream of reconnecting Rome to the Mediterranean, of ‘bringing Rome to the sea and the sea to Rome’, as Mussolini used to say. This was a city that had to represent a strong political desire and ended up as an image of mere representation, a city that was founded to contain a world exhibition and became in itself merely an exhibit. Here I am interested not only in the story the EUR (Esposizione Universale di Roma) buildings tell, but also in what they do, according to a performative view of cultural production. In other words, they are not simply new monuments to be added to Fascism's already powerful iconography, but an integral part of those processes of incorporation and rule at work in the construction of Italy's national/imperial identity.

Classical Rome national identity Roman empire urban planning World exhibitions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Architettura, 1939: special issue L'Urbe di Mussolini: 2–69.Google Scholar
  2. Asor Rosa A., 1975: Storia d'Italia. Einaudi, Torino.Google Scholar
  3. Atckinson D., Cosgrove D. and Notaro A., 1999: Empire in Modern Rome: Shaping and Remembering an Imperial City, 1870-1911. In: Driver F. and Gilbert D. (eds), Imperial Cities: Landscape, Performance and Space. Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
  4. Borrelli De Andreis G., 1942: Atti del V Congresso Nazionale di Studi Romani IV: 208–212.Google Scholar
  5. Bottai G., 1937: Il Rinnovamento di Roma. Roma.Google Scholar
  6. Boyer M.C., 1994: The City of Collective Memory: its Historical Imagery and Architectural Entertainments, p. 33, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Calvino I., 1974: Invisible Cities, pp. 37–38. Secker & Warburg, London.Google Scholar
  8. Cecchi E., 1941: Il Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana. Civiltà I: 5–9.Google Scholar
  9. Cini V., 1940: Significato e aspetti dell'Esposizione Universale di Roma. Civiltà I.Google Scholar
  10. Croce B., 1938: La storia come pensiero e come azione. Laterza, Bari.Google Scholar
  11. De Chirico G., 1920: Classicismo pittorico. La Ronda, July.Google Scholar
  12. Di Majo L. and Insolera I., 1986: L'EUR e Roma dagli anni Trenta al Duemila. Laterza, Roma-Bari.Google Scholar
  13. Fried R.C., 1973: Planning the eternal City: Roman Politics and Planning Since World War II, p. 31, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  14. Gillis J.R., 1994: Introduction: Memory and Identity, the History of a Relationship. In: Gillis J.R. (ed), Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity, p. 9, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Guglielmotti U., 1942: L'esposizione mondiale del 1942. Atti del V Congresso Nazionale di Studi Romani IV: 186–190.Google Scholar
  16. Kostof S., 1973: The Third Rome, 1870–1950, Traffic and Glory, p. 14, University Art Museum, Berkeley CA, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Marconi P., 1939: Il quartiere dell'E42, fulcro del piano regolatore di Roma imperiale. Istituto di Studi Romani, Roma. Mostra della Civiltà Italiana, Criteri fondamentali per la presentazione della Mostra, 1939: Castaldi, Roma.Google Scholar
  18. Mussolini B., 1934: Scritti e discorsi di Benito Mussolini. Hoepli, Milan.Google Scholar
  19. Notaro A., 1997: Resurrecting an Imperial Past: Strategies of Self-Representation and Masquerade in Fascist Rome (1934–1938). Renaissance and Modern Studies 40: 59–70.Google Scholar
  20. Notaro A., 2000: Telling Imperial Histories: Contests of Narrativity and Representation in Post-Unification Rome (1870–1911).Paisano, The online History Journal II: at http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~phalth/Google Scholar
  21. Pagano G., 1941: Occasioni Perdute, Casabella, 158, February.Google Scholar
  22. Piacentini M., 1923: Notiziario. Corrispondenza dalla Germania. Architettura e Arti Decorative: 496–498.Google Scholar
  23. Said E., 1989: Representing the Colonized: Anthropology's interlocutors. Critical Inquiry 15: 205–225.Google Scholar
  24. Sennett R., 1994: Flesh and Stone. Faber & Faber, London-Boston.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Notaro
    • 1
  1. 1.School of American and Canadian StudiesUniversity of NottinghamUniversity Park, NottinghamU.K.

Personalised recommendations