Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 51, Issue 1–2, pp 33–45 | Cite as

Moscow and St. Petersburg, a sequence of capitals, a tale of two cities

  • Olga Gritsai
  • Herman van der Wusten
Article

Abstract

From early modern times until the present, Russia (temporarily extended to the USSR) had two capital cities: Moscow and Petersburg. Moscow was the original capital, it was succeeded by Petersburg from the beginning of the 18th century. From the early 20th century onward Moscow again became the capital, but it became a different kind of capital at the end of the 20th century. The paper describes the evolution of the representation of the state function in the appearance of the capital cities by way of the state buildings, the monuments, the street names. In addition it analyses the fate of the former capitals (first Moscow, then Petersburg) in terms of their symbolic functions. Petersburg originated as a capital turned to the outside emphasizing Russia's European vocation, while Moscow was at first the inward looking capital city representing the distinctive spiritual values of Russia. Changes had to do with the changes in the nature of the successive political regimes and with the changing roles of the two cities within those regimes.

capital city Moscow Petersburg Russia state symbols 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Architectural memorials of Moscow. Atlas. Topchijan Ja. (ed.) 1997: Federal Department of Geodesy and Cartography, Moscow. 264 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  2. Kann P.Ja. and Sukhotin J a.F. 1999. St.Petersburg and suburbs. Peter, St.Petersburg, 224 pp. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. Luzhkov Ju. 1996: We are your children, Moscow. Magisterium, 339 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  4. Medovnikov D., 1998: The architecture of ratio. ‘Expert’, 20 April, p. 22 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  5. Ol'kina M., 1997: A rent for the window to Europe. The role of industrial forepost does not fit Petersburg. ‘Novoe vremja’, N 20, p.18 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  6. Pokhlebkin V.V., 1997: The capitols of Russia. Moscow, Zentrpoligraf, 42 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. Sedov V., 1998: Behind the back of Peter the Great. ‘Expert’, 30 March, p. 84 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  8. Sodorov D., 2000: National monumentalization and the politics of scale: the resurrections of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow. Ann. Am. Asso. Geogr. 90(3): 548–572.Google Scholar
  9. Sytin P.V., 1958: From the history of Moscow streets. Moscow, Moskovskii rabochii, 844 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  10. Vendina O. and Aksenov K., 1999: Moscow and St.Petersburg: regulated development or spontaneous transformation of urban space? In: Moscow on the background of Russia and the world: relations with the capital in the contexts of market transition, pp. 171–192. Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
  11. Vinogradov V.A. (ed.) 1996, 1997: Moscow. 850 Anniversary. Moscow Textbooks, Moscow.Google Scholar
  12. Zapesotskii A., 1998: Moscow surrendered to the new Russians. ‘Izvestija’, 4.02, 1998, (in Russian).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Gritsai
    • 1
  • Herman van der Wusten
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of GeographyAcademy of ScienceMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of Geography and PlanningUniversity of AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations