Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 353–393 | Cite as

The Portuguese naturalist Correia da Serra (1751–1823) and his impact on early nineteenth-century botany

  • Maria Paula Diogo
  • Ana Carneiro
  • Ana Simões
Article

Abstract

This paper focuses on the contributions to natural history, particularly in methods of plant classification of the Portuguese botanist, man of letters, diplomat, and Freemason Abbé José Correia da Serra (1751–1823), placing them in their national and international political and social contexts.

Correia da Serra adopted the natural method of classification championed by the Frenchman Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu, and introduced refinements of his own that owe much to parallel developments in zoology. He endorsed the view that the classification of plants should be based on the establishment of affinities rather than of differences. The emphasis on affinities went hand in hand with the development of the concept of symmetry. This idea was introduced by Correia da Serra in systematics and was adopted and further developed by his friend, Augustin-Pyramus de Candolle. Correia da Serra also argued that Cryptogamia reproduce sexually, advocated extension of methods of comparative anatomy from zoology to botany, and applied them to the study of fruits.

Correia da Serra was one among many of the estrangeirados, Portuguese``Europeanized'' intellectuals who traveled extensively abroad in most cases to escape political or religious persecution at home. The estrangeirados were important contributors to 18th and 19th century European thinking. Most of the estrangeirados were pivotal in the introduction, dissemination and propagation of the new sciences in Portugal, but unlike most of his fellow estrangeirados, Correia da Serra was also an innovative man of science in his own right.

affinities botany comparative anatomy Correia da Serra eighteenth-century Portugal Portuguese ``estrangeirados'' natural method of classification role of environment symmetry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adanson, M. 1763–1764. Familles des Plantes, 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Agan, J.E. 1926. “Corrêa da Serra.” Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 4: 9–93.Google Scholar
  3. Almeida Portugal, F. de. 1824, “Notice sur la Vie et les Travaux de M. Correa de Serra.” Mémoirs du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle 11: 215–229.Google Scholar
  4. Amorim da Costa, A. 1984. Primórdios da Ciência Química em Portugal. Lisbon: ICLP.Google Scholar
  5. Arber, A. 1950. The Natural Philosophy of Plant Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bailly, A. 1992. Défricheurs d'Inconnu. Peiresc, Tournefort, Adanson, Saporta. Aix-en-Provence: Édisud.Google Scholar
  7. Brotero, F.A. 1788. Compêndio de Botânica. Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, R. 1810. Prodromus florae Novae Hollandie. London.Google Scholar
  9. Candolle, A. de, ed. 1862. Mémoires et Souvenirs de Augustin-Pyramus de Candolle écrits par lui-même et publiés par son fils. Genéve.Google Scholar
  10. Candolle, A.-P. de. 1813. Théorie élémentaire de la Botanique. Paris.Google Scholar
  11. Carneiro, A., Simões, A. and Diogo, M.P. 2000. “Enlightenment Science in Portugal: the Estrangeirados and their Networks of Communication.” Social Studies of Science 30: 591–619.Google Scholar
  12. Carvalho, R. de. n/d. “Serra, José Correia da.” Serrão, Joel (ed.), Dicionário de História de Portugal. Lisboa: Iniciativas Editoriais, 3, pp. 841–842.Google Scholar
  13. Chadarevian, S. 1996. “Laboratory Science Versus Country-House Experiments.” British Journal for the History of Science 29: 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Correia da Serra. 1796. “On the Fructification of Submersed Algae.” Philosophical Transactions: 494–505.Google Scholar
  15. ——1799. “On Two Genera of Plants Belonging to the Natural Family of the Aurantia.” Transactions of the Linnean Society 5: 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ——1800. “On the Doryanthes, a new Genus of Plants from New Holland, next akin to the Agave.” Transactions of the Linnean Society 6: 211–213.Google Scholar
  17. ——1805. “Observations sur la famille des orangers et sur les limites qui la circonscrivent.” Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle 6: 376–387.Google Scholar
  18. ——1804. “De l'état des sciences et des lettres parmis les Portugais pendant la seconde moitié du siècle dernier.” Archives Littéraires de l’ Europe 1: 63–77 and 269–290.Google Scholar
  19. ——1806. “Observations carpologiques.” Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle 8: 59–68.Google Scholar
  20. ——1807. “Vues carpologiques.” Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle 9: 283–293.Google Scholar
  21. ——1807a. “Vues carpologiques, Article II.” Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle 10: 151–156.Google Scholar
  22. ——1815. Reduction of all Genera of Plants Contained in the Catalogus Plantarum Americae Septentrionalis, of the Late Dr. Muhlenberg, to the Natural Families of Mr. Jussieu's System. For the Use of the Gentlemen who Attended the Course of Elementary and Philosophical Botany in Philadelphia in 1815. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  23. ——1996. Elogio de Benjamin Franklin. Lisboa: Fundação Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento.Google Scholar
  24. Cuvier, G. 1819–1827. Recueil des éloges historiques lus dans les séances publiques de l'Institut royale de France, précédé des reflexions sur la marche actuelle des sciences, 3 vols. Paris/Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  25. ——1983. La querelle des analogues, re-print. Paris: Éditions D'Aujourd'Hui.Google Scholar
  26. Davis, R.B. 1955. “The Abbé Correa in America, 1812–1820: The Contributions of the Diplomat and the Natural Philosopher to the Foundations of our National Life.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 4: 87–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ——1993. The Abbé Correa in America, 1812–1820: The Contributions of the Diplomat and the Natural Philosopher to the Foundations of our National Life. NewYork: Gavea Brown Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Drouin, J.-M. 1993. “La règle et l'écart: la philosophie botanique d'Augustin-Pyramus de Candolle.” Ludus Vitalis (Journal of Philosophy of Life Sciences) 2: 69–89.Google Scholar
  29. Eigen, E.A. 1997. “Overcoming First Impressions: George Cuvier's Types.” Journal of the History of Biology 30: 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Farber, P.L. 1976. “The Type-Concept in Zoology during the First Half of the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of the History of Biology 9: 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Farley, J. 1982. Gametes and Spores. Ideas about Sexual Reproduction, 1750–1914. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gage, A.T. and Stearn, W.T. 1988. A Bicentenary History of the Linnean Society of London. London: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Gärtner, C., ed. 1805–1807. Supplementarum Carpologicae, 3 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
  34. Gärtner, J. 1788–1791. De Fructibus et Seminibus Plantarum, 2 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  35. Hedwig, J. 1779. “Vorfläufige Anzeige seiner Beobachtungen von den wahren Geschlechtstheilen der Moose und ihrer Fortpflanzung durch Saamen.” Sammlungen zur Physik un Naturgeschichte von einigen Liebhabern dieser Wissenschaften 1: 259–281.Google Scholar
  36. Henriques, J. 1922. “José Francisco Correia da Serra.” Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 1: 85–125.Google Scholar
  37. Hofmeister, W. 1851. Vergeleichende Untersuchungen der keimung, Entfaltung und Fruchtbildung höherer Kryptogamen (Moose, Farrn, Equisetaceen, Rhizocarpeen und Lycopodiaceen) und der Samenbildung der Coniferen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
  38. Jussieu, A.L. de. 1789. Genera Plantarum. Paris.Google Scholar
  39. Link, H.F. 1803–1805. Voyage au Portugal depuis 1797 jusqu'en 1799, 3 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
  40. Mabberley, D.J. 1985. Jupiter Botanicus: Robert Brown of the British Museum. London: Lubrecht and Cramer Ltd.Google Scholar
  41. Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge Mass/London: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  42. Michaud, J. and Louis, G., eds. 1811–1828. Biographie Universelle, 52 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
  43. Metzger, H. 1959. La genèse de la science des cristaux, 2nd ed. Paris: Albert Blanchard.Google Scholar
  44. Pringsheim, N. 1855. “Ñber die Befruchtung der Algen.” Bericht der königliche Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaft zur Berlin 134S.Google Scholar
  45. Russel, E.S. 1916. Form and Function. A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology. London: Murray.Google Scholar
  46. Sachs, J. von. 1892. Histoire de la botanique (French translation by Henry de Varigny). Paris: C. Reiwald.Google Scholar
  47. Silva Carvalho, A. da. 1948. “O Abade Correia da Serra.” Memórias da Academia das Ciências de Lisboa, Classe de Ciências (off-print), 4.Google Scholar
  48. Simões, A., Carneiro, A. and Diogo, M.P. 1999. “Constructing Knowledge: Eighteenthcentury Portugal and the New Sciences.” Archimedes 2: 1–40.Google Scholar
  49. Stevens, P.F. 1984. “Haüy and A.-P. de Candolle: Crystallography, Botanical Systematics, and Comparative Morphology, 1780–1840.” Journal of the History of Biology 17: 49–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. ——1994. The Development of Biological Systematics. Antoine-Laurent Jussieu, Nature and the Natural System. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  51. ——1998. “Mind, Memory and History: How Classifications are Shaped by and Through Time, and some Consequences.” Zoologica Scripta 26: 293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stevens, P.F. and Cullen, S.P. 1990. “Linnaeus, the Cortex-Medulla Theory and the Key to His Understanding of Plant Form and Natural Relationship.” Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 71: 179–220.Google Scholar
  53. Teague, M. 1994. “Kindred Spirits: Thomas Jefferson and José Correia da Serra.” The Journal of the American Portuguese Society. 35th Anniversary Issue. 16–22.Google Scholar
  54. Thuret, G.A. 1850. “Recherches sur les zoospores des algues et les anthérides des Cryptogames.” Annales des Science Naturelle 14: 214–260.Google Scholar
  55. ——1851. “Recherches sur les zoospores des Algues et les anthérides des Cryptogames.” Annales des Science Naturelle 16: 5–39.Google Scholar
  56. Vaucher, J.P. 1801. “Sur les graines des conferves.” Journal de physique 51: 344–358.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Paula Diogo
    • 1
  • Ana Carneiro
    • 1
  • Ana Simões
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Secção de História e Filosofia da Ciência (SACSA)Universidade Nova de Lisboa/CICSAMonte de CaparicaPortugal
  2. 2.Departamento de Física, Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations