Skip to main content
Log in

Mobility and Privilege Within Queer Studies and University

  • Published:
International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies

Abstract

In this essay, the author considers how classist divisions present within queer studies may well be exacerbated by the institutionalization of queer studies within university. In particular, she examines the class privilege that attends both queer theory's and university's deployment of travel metaphors. In both cases, the language of travel is the potentially empowering language of intellectual agility and social mobility. Importantly, though, both queer theorists' and university administrators' employment of travel metaphors often serves to reaffirm cultural hegemony, specifically to sustain rather than to examine and combat social oppression. This sad irony is particularly apparent when one compares university representations of commuter and residential students. Thus, the question that faces universities is how to keep queer studies critically queer so that universities can recognize and address the various forms or models of social mobility that are present on their campuses, commuter as well as residential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • AnzaldÚa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cape Cod Times (1999). Cape' jobless rate up slightly. Cape Cod Times (11/27/1999), C8.

  • Critchley, J. (1999). P'town, inc., survivalist camp resort. The Harvard Gay & Lesbian Review, VI, 3 (Summer, 1999), 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J. (1902/1995). Heart of darkness. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, M. (1995). Long point light. In Atlantis. pp. 44–45. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, M. (1995a). Homo will not inherit. In Atlantis. pp. 76–9. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, UCLA. (1998). Institutional profile for the University of Connecticut: 1998 CIRP freshman survey. Los Angeles: UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammonds, E. (1991). Black (w)holes and the geometry of black female sexuality. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 3, 126–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, S. (1996). (White) lesbian studies. In B. Zimmerman & T. McNaron (Eds.). The new lesbian studies into the twenty-first century (pp. 247–255). New York: The Feminist Press at the City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, F. (1914/1915, 1925, 1956). The trial. W. & E. Muir (Transl.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. (1973, 1982). A trip on the Staten Island ferry. In Chosen poems, old and new (pp. 87–88). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, K. (1997). Un/popular culture: Lesbian writing after the sex wars. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaron, T. (1997). Poisoned ivy: Lesbian and gay academics confronting homophobia. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiners, E. (1998). Remember when all the cars were Fords and all the lesbians were women? Some notes on identity, mobility, and capital. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.). Queer theory in education (pp. 121–140). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ondaatje, M. (1992). The English patient. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, S. (1997). Lesbians and mestizas: Appropriation and equivalence. In S. Phelan (Ed.). Playing with fire: Queer politics, queer theorists (pp. 75–95). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provincetown Website. http:/ /www.state.ma.us/dhcd/iprofile/242.htm

  • Roman, D. (1995). Teaching differences: Theory and practice in a lesbian and gay studies seminar. In G. E. Haggerty & B. Zimmerman (Eds.). Professions of desire (pp. 113–123). New York: Modern Language Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. & Dilley, P. (1998). Constructing knowledge: Educational research and gay and lesbian studies. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.). Queer theory in education (pp. 49–71).

  • The University of Connecticut: Avery Point campus. (n.d.). Storrs: University of Connecticut.

  • University of Connecticut general catalog, 1998–1999. (1998). Storrs: University of Connecticut.

  • UCONN 2000: Four year progress report. (1999). Storrs: University of Connecticut.

  • Warner, M. (1993). Introduction. In M. Warner (Ed.), Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory (pp. vii-xxxi). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbo-Bejarano, Y. (1995). Expanding the categories of race and sexuality in lesbian and gay studies. In G. E. Haggerty & B. Zimmerman (Eds.). Professions of desire (pp. 124–135).

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breen, M.S. Mobility and Privilege Within Queer Studies and University. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 5, 59–69 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010137601963

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010137601963

Navigation