Abstract
In this essay, the author considers how classist divisions present within queer studies may well be exacerbated by the institutionalization of queer studies within university. In particular, she examines the class privilege that attends both queer theory's and university's deployment of travel metaphors. In both cases, the language of travel is the potentially empowering language of intellectual agility and social mobility. Importantly, though, both queer theorists' and university administrators' employment of travel metaphors often serves to reaffirm cultural hegemony, specifically to sustain rather than to examine and combat social oppression. This sad irony is particularly apparent when one compares university representations of commuter and residential students. Thus, the question that faces universities is how to keep queer studies critically queer so that universities can recognize and address the various forms or models of social mobility that are present on their campuses, commuter as well as residential.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
AnzaldÚa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
Cape Cod Times (1999). Cape' jobless rate up slightly. Cape Cod Times (11/27/1999), C8.
Critchley, J. (1999). P'town, inc., survivalist camp resort. The Harvard Gay & Lesbian Review, VI, 3 (Summer, 1999), 38–39.
Conrad, J. (1902/1995). Heart of darkness. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Doty, M. (1995). Long point light. In Atlantis. pp. 44–45. New York: Harper Collins.
Doty, M. (1995a). Homo will not inherit. In Atlantis. pp. 76–9. New York: Harper Collins.
Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, UCLA. (1998). Institutional profile for the University of Connecticut: 1998 CIRP freshman survey. Los Angeles: UCLA.
Hammonds, E. (1991). Black (w)holes and the geometry of black female sexuality. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 3, 126–144.
Holland, S. (1996). (White) lesbian studies. In B. Zimmerman & T. McNaron (Eds.). The new lesbian studies into the twenty-first century (pp. 247–255). New York: The Feminist Press at the City University of New York.
Kafka, F. (1914/1915, 1925, 1956). The trial. W. & E. Muir (Transl.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Lorde, A. (1973, 1982). A trip on the Staten Island ferry. In Chosen poems, old and new (pp. 87–88). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Martindale, K. (1997). Un/popular culture: Lesbian writing after the sex wars. Albany: State University of New York Press.
McNaron, T. (1997). Poisoned ivy: Lesbian and gay academics confronting homophobia. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Meiners, E. (1998). Remember when all the cars were Fords and all the lesbians were women? Some notes on identity, mobility, and capital. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.). Queer theory in education (pp. 121–140). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ondaatje, M. (1992). The English patient. New York: Random House.
Phelan, S. (1997). Lesbians and mestizas: Appropriation and equivalence. In S. Phelan (Ed.). Playing with fire: Queer politics, queer theorists (pp. 75–95). New York: Routledge.
Provincetown Website. http:/ /www.state.ma.us/dhcd/iprofile/242.htm
Roman, D. (1995). Teaching differences: Theory and practice in a lesbian and gay studies seminar. In G. E. Haggerty & B. Zimmerman (Eds.). Professions of desire (pp. 113–123). New York: Modern Language Association.
Tierney, W. G. & Dilley, P. (1998). Constructing knowledge: Educational research and gay and lesbian studies. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.). Queer theory in education (pp. 49–71).
The University of Connecticut: Avery Point campus. (n.d.). Storrs: University of Connecticut.
University of Connecticut general catalog, 1998–1999. (1998). Storrs: University of Connecticut.
UCONN 2000: Four year progress report. (1999). Storrs: University of Connecticut.
Warner, M. (1993). Introduction. In M. Warner (Ed.), Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory (pp. vii-xxxi). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Yarbo-Bejarano, Y. (1995). Expanding the categories of race and sexuality in lesbian and gay studies. In G. E. Haggerty & B. Zimmerman (Eds.). Professions of desire (pp. 124–135).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Breen, M.S. Mobility and Privilege Within Queer Studies and University. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 5, 59–69 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010137601963
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010137601963