Skip to main content
Log in

A Framework for Designing a Global Information Network for Multinational Humanitarian Assistance/Disaster Relief

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large-scale Humanitarian Assistance/Disaster Relief (HA/DR) operations, particularly in developing countries, require the intervention and aid of various agencies from all over the world in a concerted and timely manner. As a result, HA/DR operations involve dynamic information exchange, planning, coordination and above all negotiation. Although a number of studies have reported the benefits of using information and communication technologies to support negotiation activities, it remains unclear how such technologies could be adapted to large-scale HA/DR operations. This paper examines negotiational issues involved in a multinational HA/DR environment and presents a framework that would help in developing a Global Information Network (GIN). The proposed framework can be used to assess and characterize individual disaster situations so that the GIN functional and design requirements can be accurately identified early. Future implications to GIN architecture are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Action by Churches Together (ACT). (1998). Dateline ACT Afghanistan: assistance for earthquake victims [Online]. Available: http://wwwnotes.reliefweb.int/files/ RWDomi no.nsf/480fa8736b88bbc3c12564f6004c8ad5/ 5f48234351b5bf2fc12566270052be2a? OpenDocument 1999.

  2. Aisbett J, Srikanth R. Communication centers and the need to support both protection and promulgation of information. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, The International Society for Decision Support Systems [CDROM], Melbourne, Australia, 1999.

  3. Andriole JA. Computer-supported cooperative negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation 1996;5(4/6):469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anthes GH. Red alert. Computerworld 1997;31(27):83–84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belardo S, Karwan KR, Wallace WA. Managing the response to disasters using microcomputers. Interface 1984;14(2):29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Belardo S, Pazer HL, Wallace WA, Danko WD. Simulation of a crisis management information network: a serendipitous evaluation. Decision Sciences 1983;14(4):588–606.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Billings RS, Millburn TW, Schaalman ML. A model of crisis perception: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 1980;25(2):300–316.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bui T. Design study for the VIC workflow system. Technical Report (SAIC/UH). Unpublished 1999.

  9. Bui T, Shakun M. Negotiation processes, evolutionary system design, and NEGOTIATOR. Group Decision and Negotiation 1996;5(5):339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson PJ, Davis GB. An investigation of media selection among directors and managers: from “self” to “other” orientation. MIS Quarterly 1998;22(3):335–362.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carraro C, Lanza A, Tudini A. Technological change, technology transfers, and the negotiation of international agreement. International Environmental Affairs 1994;6(3221):203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crichlow D. Taking a comprehensive approach to handling disasters. American City and County 1997:50–60.

  13. Druckman D. Processes and Consequences of International Negotiations. Journal of Social Issues 1997;33(1) 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dukes-Schlossberg J, Lee YW, Lehrer N. IIDS: intelligent information dissemination server. Proceedings of IEEE MILCOM. November 2–5, Monterey, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Staff Writer. The lesson of hurricane Pauline. Economist, 1997;345(8039):35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Staff Writer. Economist. Science and technology: a deluge of information. Economist 1998;349(8096):86

    Google Scholar 

  17. Egelhoff WG. An information-processing model of crisis management. Management Communication Quarterly 1992;5(4):443–484.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fielding RT, Whitehead Jr EJ, Anderson KM, Bolcer GA, Oreizy P, Taylor RN. Web-based development of complex information products. Communications of the ACM 1998;41(8):84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fink RA. Look what else the Internet can do. Medical economics 1997;74(5):197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gaffin A. Lotus Notes being put through its paces by military. Network World 1995;12(5):25.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hale J. A layered communication architecture for the support of crisis response. Journal of Management Information Systems 1997;14(1):235–255.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hammainen H, Eloranta E, Alasuvanto J. Distributed form management. ACM Transaction on Information Systems 1990;8(1):50–76.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harashina S. Environmental dispute resolution process and information exchange. Environment Impact Assess Review 1995;15:69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Harrald JR, Cohn R, Wallace WA. We are always re-organizing...: some crisis management implications of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Industrial Crisis Quarterly 1992;6:197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Housel TJ, El Saway OA, Donovan PF. Information systems for crisis management: lessons from Southern California Edison. MIS quarterly 1986;10(4):389–400.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Inter-Agency Standing Committee. (1998). Strategic humanitarian coordination in the Great lakes, 1996–1997: an independent assessment. Available: http://wwwnotes.reliefweb. int/files/rwdomino.nsf/480fa8736b88bbc3c12564f6004c8ad5/ 000dca5d5e654e6cc12566090042c27d?OpenDocument [1999, May 19].

  27. Long D. Logistics for disaster relief, IIE Solutions June, 1997:26–29.

  28. Mak H-Y, Mallard AP, Bui T, Au G. Building online crisis management support using workflow systems. Decision Support Systems 1999;25(3):209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McGrath GM, More E, Campbell B, and Offen RJ. Intraorganizational collaboration in a complex, rapidly-changing information services company: a field study. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, The International Society for Decision Support Systems [CD-ROM], July 20–23, Melbourne, Australia 1999.

  30. Morrow JD. Modeling the forms of international cooperation: distribution versus information. International Organization 1994;48(3):387–423.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mowry C. Satellites save lives. Satellite Communications. February, 1999:70.

  32. Nunamaker JF, Weber ES, Chen M. Organizational crisis management systems: planning for intelligent action. Journal of Management Information Systems 1989;5(4):7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  33. O'Keefe P, Kirkby J. Relief and rehabilitation in complex emergencies, Review of African Political Economy, 1997;24(74):567–582.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pan American Health Organization. A world safe from natural disasters. Available: http://www.paho.org/english/ped/peddisen. htm [1999, July 27].

  35. Pan American Health Organization. Disaster management on the Internet. Available: http://www.paho.org/english/ped/pednewen. htm [1999, July 27].

  36. Quarantelli EL. Disaster crisis management: a summary of research findings. Journal of Management Studies 1988;25(4):373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rudy IA. A critical review of research on electronic mail. European Journal of Information Systems 1996;4:198–213.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schmidlin T. Ono Y. Tornadoes in the districts of Jamalpur and Tangail in Bangladesh. Available: Quick response Report #90, http://www.Colorado.EDU/hazards/ qr/qr90.html, 1999, July

  39. Sovereign MG. Humanitarian assistance and disaster relief in the next century. Workshop Report, Paper presented at the Institute for National Strategic Studies, Washington, October 28–30, D.C., 1997.

  40. Stern AJ. Using environmental impact assessments for dispute management, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 1991;11:81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stranieri A, Zeleznikow J. A survey of argumentation structures for intelligent decision support. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, The International Society for Decision Support Systems [CD-ROM], Melbourne, Australia, July 20–23, 1999.

  42. Studeneister MS. The impact of information and communications technologies on international conflict management. Bulletin of The American Society for Information Science, Feburary/March, 1998:24–27.

  43. Taguchi J. Japanese officials and PR mentality: will they learn this time? Public Relations Quarterly 1995;40(1):31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tan WD, Arnott DR. Managerial information acquisition and the WorldWide Web: a theoretical background. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, The International Society for Decision Support Systems [CD-ROM], Melbourne, Australia, July 20–23, 1999.

  45. Thomas K. Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. In Dunnette(ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  46. United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs. Relief coordination branch regional desks. Available: http://www.reliefweb. int/dha_ol/programs/response/rcbdesk.html, 1999, July 25._

  47. Vandenbosh B, Higgings C. Executive support systems and executive preferences: a comparison of information selection theories. Information Systems Journal, 1995;5:105–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bui, T., Cho, S., Sankaran, S. et al. A Framework for Designing a Global Information Network for Multinational Humanitarian Assistance/Disaster Relief. Information Systems Frontiers 1, 427–442 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010074210709

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010074210709

Navigation