Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 21–30 | Cite as

Chronic mental illness and the limits of the biopsychosocial model

  • Dirk Richter
Article

Abstract

Twenty years ago, the biopsychosocial model was proposed by George Engel to be the new paradigm for medicine and psychiatry. The model assumed a hierarchical structure of the biological, psychological and social system and simple interactions between the participating systems. This article holds the thesis that the original biopsychosocial model cannot depict psychiatry's reality and problems. The clinical validity of the biopsychosocial model has to be questioned. It is argued that psychiatric interventions can only stimulate but not determine their target systems, because intervention and outcome are only loosely coupled. Thus, psychiatric interventions have in principle limited ranges which differ according to the type of intervention and according to the system to be stimulated. Psychosocial interventions face far more obstacles to be overcome than psychopharmacogical therapy.

biopsychosocial model chronic mental illness psychiatry psychopharmacology psychosocial therapy systems theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, N.B. and C.A. Armstead: 1995, ‘Toward understanding the association of socioeconomic status and health: A new challenge for the biopsychosocial model’, Psychosomatic Medicine 57, 213–225.Google Scholar
  2. Birchwood, M., P. McGorry and H. Jackson: 1997, ‘Early intervention in schizophrenia’, British Journal of Psychiatry 170, 2–5.Google Scholar
  3. Bury, M.: 1991, ‘The sociology of chronic illness: A review of research and prospects’, Sociology of Health and Illness 13, 451–468.Google Scholar
  4. Conrad, P.: 1992, ‘Medicalisation and social control’, Annual Review of Sociology 18, 209–232.Google Scholar
  5. Eikelmann, B.: 1997, Sozialpsychiatrisches Basiswissen. Grundlagen und Praxis. Stuttgart: Enke.Google Scholar
  6. Engel, G.L.: 1977, ‘The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine’, Science 196, 129–136.Google Scholar
  7. Engel, G.L.: 1981, ‘The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6, 101–123.Google Scholar
  8. Engel, G.L.: 1982, ‘The biopsychosocial model and medical education: Who are to be the teachers?’, New England Journal of Medicine 306, 802–805.Google Scholar
  9. Engel, G.L.: 1992, ‘How much longer must medicine's science be bound by a seventeenth century world view?’, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 57, 3–16.Google Scholar
  10. Engel, G.L.: 1997, ‘From biomedical to biopsychosocial: Being scientific in the human domain’, Psychosomatics 38, 521–528.Google Scholar
  11. Fairhurst, K., M. Blair, J. Cutting, M. Featherstone, B. Hayes, M. Howarth, D. Rose and I. Stanley: 1996, ‘The quality of hospital discharge. A survey of discharge arrangements for the over-65s’, International Journal of Quality in Health Care 8, 167–174.Google Scholar
  12. Feinberg, T.E.: 1997, ‘The irreducible perspectives of consciousness’, Seminars in Neurology 17, 85–93.Google Scholar
  13. Freedman, A.M.: 1995, ‘The biopsychosocial paradigm and the future of psychiatry’, Comprehensive Psychiatry 36, 397–406.Google Scholar
  14. Haselbeck, H.: 1990, ‘Sozialpsychiatrie und das biologische Krankheitsmodell. Von der Konfrontation zur Integration’, In: A. Thom and E. Wulff (eds.), Psychiatrie im Wandel. Erfahrungen und Perspektiven in Ost und West. Bonn: Psychiatrie-Verlag, pp. 13–21.Google Scholar
  15. Hastedt, H.: 1988, Das Leib-Seele-Problem. Zwischen Naturwissenschaft des Geistes und kultureller Eindimensionalität. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Kandel, E.R.: 1989, ‘Genes, nerve cells, and the remembrance of things past’, Journal of Neuropsychiatry 1, 103–125.Google Scholar
  17. Kandel, E.R.: 1998, ‘A new intellectual framework for psychiatry’, American Journal of Psychiatry 155, 457–469.Google Scholar
  18. Kendler, K.S.: 1997, ‘The genetic epidemiology of psychiatric disorders’, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 32, 5–11.Google Scholar
  19. Liberman, R.P.: 1994, ‘Psychosocial treatments for schizophrenia’, Psychiatry 57, 104–114.Google Scholar
  20. Luhmann, N.: 1997, Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/ M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  21. Mai, F.M.: 1995, ‘Clinical and basic science aspects of the biopsychosocial model’, Journal Psychiatry and Neuroscience 20, 335–336 (Editorial).Google Scholar
  22. Maturana, H. and F. Varela: 1993, Der Baum der Erkenntnis. Wie wir die Welt durch die Wahrnehmung erschaffen - die biologischen Wurzeln des menschlichen Erkennens, 3rd edn. Bern/München/Wien: Scherz.Google Scholar
  23. Mechanic, D.: 1986, ‘The challenge of chronic mental illness: A retrospective and prospective view’, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 37, 891–896.Google Scholar
  24. Mechanic, D.: 1995, ‘Sociological dimensions of illness behavior’, Social Science and Medicine 41, 1207–1216.Google Scholar
  25. Mechanic, D. and L. Aiken: 1987, ‘Improving the care of patients with chronic mental illness’, New England Journal of Medicine 317, 1634–1638.Google Scholar
  26. Metzinger, T.: 1993, Subjekt und Selbstmodell. Die Perspektivität phänomenalen Bewußtseins vor dem Hintergrund einer naturalistischen Theorie mentaler Repräsentation. Paderborn etc.: Schöningh.Google Scholar
  27. Milner, B., L.R. Squire and E.R. Kandel: 1998, ‘Cognitive neuroscience and the study of memory’, Neuron 20, 445–468.Google Scholar
  28. Monti, P.M., S. Bird Gulliver and M.G. Myers: 1994, ‘Social skills training for alcoholics: Assessment and treatment’, Alcohol and Alcoholism 29, 627–637.Google Scholar
  29. Paris, J.: 1996, ‘Antisocial personality disorder: A biopsychosocial model’, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 41, 75–80.Google Scholar
  30. Picton, T.W. and D.T. Stuss: 1994, ‘Neurobiology and conscious experience’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 4, 256–265.Google Scholar
  31. Rabinowitz, J., M. Mark, M. Popper and M. Sluyzberg: 1995, ‘Predicting revolving-door patients in a 9–year national sample’, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 30, 65–72.Google Scholar
  32. Ram, R., E.J. Bromet, W.W. Eaton, et al.: 1992, ‘The natural course of schizophrenia: A review of first-admission studies’, Schizophrenia Bulletin 18, 185–207.Google Scholar
  33. Richter, D., K. Berger and B. Eikelmann: ‘Was bestimmt den psychiatrischen Problempatienten? Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung zur Patienteneinstufung in der Psychiatrie-Personalverordnung’, Fortschritte der Neurologie und Psychiatrie (in press).Google Scholar
  34. Rössler, W., H.J. Salize, U. Biechele and A. Riecher-Rössler: 1994, ‘Stand und Entwicklung der psychiatrischen Versorgung. Ein europäischer Vergleich’, Nervenarzt 65, 427–437.Google Scholar
  35. Sadler, J.Z. and Y.F. Hulgus: 1990, ‘Knowing, valuing, acting: Clues to revising the biopsychosocial model’, Comprehensive Psychiatry 31, 185–195.Google Scholar
  36. Sadler, J.Z. and Y.F. Hulgus: 1992, ‘Clinical problem solving and the biopsychosocial model’, American Journal of Psychiatry 149, 1315–1323.Google Scholar
  37. Schmid, S.: 1981, Freiheit heilt. Bericht über die demokratische Psychiatrie in Italien. Berlin: Wagenbach.Google Scholar
  38. Schrott, L.M.: 1997, ‘Effect of training and environment on brain morphology’, Acta Paediatrica 422(Supplement), 45–47.Google Scholar
  39. Scott, A.: 1995, Stairway to the Mind: The Controversial New Science of Consciousness. New York: Copernicus.Google Scholar
  40. Veggeberg, S.K.: 1996, Medication of the Mind. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  41. Weiner, H.: 1994, ‘Ist das ‘biopsychosoziale Modell’ ein hilfreiches Konstrukt?’, Psychotherapie Psychosomatik medizinische Psychologie 44, 73–83.Google Scholar
  42. Wilkinson, R.G.: 1996, Unhealthy Societies. The Afflictions of Inequality. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Willke, H.: 1987, ‘Strategien der Intervention in autonome Systeme’, in: D. Baecker et al. (eds.), Theorie als Passion. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  44. Zimmermann, C. and M. Tansella: 1996, ‘Psychosocial factors and physical illness in primary care: Promoting the biopsychosocial model in medical practice’, Journal of Psychosomatic Research 40, 351–358.Google Scholar
  45. Zubin, J and B. Spring: 1977, ‘Vulnerability - A new view of schizophrenia’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 86, 103–126Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Richter
    • 1
  1. 1.Westf. Klinik für Psychiatrie und PsychotherapieMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations