Abstract
Based on the design of many modern chemical instruments, information about a specimen is retrieved after the specimen undergoes agitation, manipulation and disturbance of its internal state. But can we retain the traditional ideal that instruments should reveal properties that are definable independently of all modes of detection? In this paper I argue that the capacity of chemical instruments to convert experimental phenomena to information places constraints on the way in which the specimen is characterized. During research, the specimen is defined by those properties which permit its detection. Based on modern instrumentation, this constraint necessitates a conception of the specimen as a reactive system of dynamical properties. The dream of a purely transparent detection process violates the design of chemical instruments. This mutual dependence of instrument and specimen is illustrated by empirical studies of the geometrical configuration of DNA.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
R. Ackermann, Data, Instruments, and Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1985.
E. Cassirer, Substance and Function and Einstein's Theory of Relativity, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY, 1923.
R. Dickerson, H. Drew and B. Conner, Single-Crystal X-ray Structure Analyses of A, B and Z Helices or One Good Turn Deserved Another. In R. Sarma (Ed.), Biomolecular Stereodynamics, Volume I, Adenine Press, New York, NY, 1981, pp. 1–34.
R. Franklin and R. Gosling, Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate. Nature 171: 740–741, 1953a.
R. Franklin and R. Gosling, Evidence for 2-Chain Helix in Crystalline Structure of Sodium Deoxyribonucleate. Nature 172: 156–157, 1953b.
C. Frederick, J. Grable, M. Melia, C. Samudzi, L. Jen-Jacobson, B. Wang, P. Greene, H. Boyer and J. Rosenberg, Kinked DNA in Crystalline Complex with EcoRI Endonuclease. Nature 309: 327–330, 1984.
I. Hacking, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.
R. Harré, Varieties of Realism, Basil Blackwell Inc., Oxford, 1986.
B. Latour, Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
S. Lelas, Science as Technology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 423–442, 1993.
C. Mann, T. Vickers and W. Gulick, Instrumental Analysis, Harper & Row, New York, NY, 1974.
R. Maroun and W. Olson, DNA, II. Configurational Statistics of Rodlike Chains. Biopolymers 27: 561–584, 1988.
C.K. Mathews and K.E. van Holde, Biochemistry, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, CA, 1996.
W. Olson, N. Marky, R. Jernigan and V. Zhurkin, Influence of Fluctuations on DNA Curvature: A Comparsion of Flexible and Static Wedge Models of Intrinsically Bent DNA. Journal of Molecular Biology 232: 530–554, 1993.
H.-J. Rheinberger, Experiment, Difference, and Writing: I. Tracing Protein Synthesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23: 305–332, 1992.
D. Rothbart and S. Slayden, The Epistemology of a Spectrometer. Philosophy of Science 61: 25–38, 1994.
D. Rothbart and I. Scherer, Kant's Critique of Judgment and the Scientific Investigation of Matter. Hyle 3: 65–80, 1997.
A. Sarai, J. Mazur, R. Nussinov and R. Jernigan, Sequence Dependence of DNA Conformational Flexibility. Biochemistry 28: 7842–7849, 1989.
D. Skoog and J. Leary, Principles and Instrumental Analysis, Fourth Edition. Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth, TX, 1992.
A. Scrinivasan, R. Torres, W. Clark and W. Olson, Base Sequence Effects in Double Helical DNA. I. Potential Energy Estimates of Local Base Morphology. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics 5: 459–493, 1987.
H. Strobel and W. Heineman, Chemical Instrumentation: A Systematic Approach, Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1989.
J. Watson and F. Crick, The Structure of DNA. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 18: 123–131, 1953.
K. Zakrzewska, Static and Dynamic Conformational Properties of AT Sequence in B-DNA. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics 9: 681–693.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rothbart, D. On the Relationship Between Instrument and Specimen in Chemical Research. Foundations of Chemistry 1, 255–268 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009902306647
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009902306647