Skip to main content
Log in

Methane Emissions from Irrigated Rice Fields in Northern India (New Delhi)

  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methane (CH4) emission fluxes from rice fields as affected by water regime, organic amendment, and rice cultivar were measured at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, using manual and automatic sampling techniques of the closed chamber method. Measurements were conducted during four consecutive cropping seasons (July to October) from 1994 to 1997. Emission rates were very low (between 16 and 40 kg CH4 m−2 season−1) when the field was flooded permanently. These low emissions were indirectly caused by the high percolation rates of the soil; frequent water replenishment resulted in constant inflow of oxygen in the soil. The local practice of intermittent flooding, which encompasses short periods without standing water in the field, further reduced emission rates. Over the course of four seasons, the total CH4 emission from intermittently irrigated fields was found to be 22% lower as compared with continuous flooding. The CH4 flux was invariably affected by rice cultivar. The experiments conducted during 1995 with one cultivar developed by IRRI (IR72) and two local cultivars (Pusa 169 and Pusa Basmati) showed that the average CH4 flux from the intermittently irrigated plots without any organic amendment ranged between 10.2 and 14.2 mg m−2 d−1. The impact of organic manure was tested in 1996 and 1997 with varieties IR72 and Pusa 169. Application of organic manure (FYM + wheat straw) in combination with urea (1:1 N basis) enhanced CH4 emission by 12–20% as compared with fields treated with urea only. The site in New Delhi represents one example of very low CH4 emissions from rice fields. Emissions from other sites in northern India may be higher than those in New Delhi, but they are still lower than in other rice-growing regions in India. The practice of intermittent irrigation--in combination with low organic inputs--is commonly found in northern India and will virtually impede further mitigation of CH4 emissions in significant quantities. In turn, the results of this study may provide clues to reduce emissions in other parts of India with higher baseline emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhya TK, Rath AK, Gupta PK, Rao VR, Das SN, Parida KM, Parashar DC & Sethunathan N (1994) Methane emission from flooded rice fields under irrigated conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 18:245–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhya TK, Bharati K, Mohanty SR, Mishra SR, Ramakrishnan B, Rao VR, Sethunathan N (2000) Methane emissions from rice fields at Cuttack, India. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst, this issue

  • Bharati K, Mohanty SR, Padmavathi PVL, Rao VR & Adhya TK (2000) Nitrification inhibitors and methane production in a flooded alluvial soil. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst, this issue

  • Chen Z, Li D, Shao K & Wang B (1993) Features of CH4 emission from rice paddy fields in Beijing and Nanjing. Chemosphere 26:239–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicerone RJ & Shetter JD (1981) Sources of atmospheric methane: measurements in rice paddies and a discussion. J Geophys Res 86:7203–7209

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicerone RJ, Shetter JD & Delwiche CC (1983) Seasonal variation of methane flux from California rice paddy. J Geophys Res 88:11022–11024

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicerone RJ & Oremland RS (1988) Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2: 299–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Debnath G, Jain MC, Kumar S, Sarkar K & Sinha SK (1996) Methane emission from rice fields amended with biogas slurry and farm yard manure. Climate Change 33:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • GEIA – Global Emission Inventory Activity (1993) Report on the 3rd workshop, Amersford, 31 Jan-02 Feb 1993, A.F. Bowman (ed), Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 83 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R & Seiler W (1985) Production, oxidation, and emission of methane in rice paddies. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31:149–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Huke RE & Huke EH (1997). Rice area by type of culture: South, Southeast and East Asia. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, 15 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GL & Mosier AR (1981) Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide flux. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:311–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Inubushi K, Muramatsu Y & Umerayasi M (1992) Influence of percolation on methane emission from flooded paddy soil. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 63:184–189

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1996) Climate Change 1995. The Science of Climate Change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. 572 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil MAK & Shearer MJ (1993) Atmospheric methane: sources, sinks and role in global change. Chemosphere 26:201–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindau CW, Bollich PK & De Laune RD (1995) Effect of rice variety on methane emission from Louisiana rice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 54:109–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra AP (1992) Greenhouse gas emission in India: 1991 Methane campaign. Science Report No. 2, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra S, Jain MC, Kumar S, Bandyopadhyay SK & Kalra N (1999) Effect of rice cultivars on methane emission. Agric Ecosyst Environ 73(3):177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Neue HU & Sass RL (1998) The budget of methane from rice fields. IGACtivities 12:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Neue HU, Lantin RS, Wassmann R, Aduna JB, Alberto CR & Andales MJF (1994) Methane emission from rice soils of the Philippines. In: Minami K, Mosier A & Sass RL (eds) CH4 and N2O: Global Emissions and Controls from Rice Fields and Other Agricultural and Industrial Sources, pp 55–63, Yokendo, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Neue HU, Wassmann R, Kludze HK, Wang B & Lantin RL (1997) Factors and processes controlling methane emissions from rice fields. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 49:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Parashar DC, Rai J, Gupta PK & Singh N (1991) Parameters affecting methane emission from paddy fields. Indian J Radio Space Phys 20:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Parashar DC, Mitra AP, Sinha SK, Gupta PK, Rai J, Sharma RC, Singh N, Kaul S, Lal G, Chaudhary A, Ray HS, Das SN, Parida KM, Rao SB, Kanung SP, Ramasami T, Nair BU, Swamy M, Gupta SK, Singh AR, Saikia BK, Barua AKS, Pathak MG, Iyer CPS, Gopalakrishnan M, Sane PV, Singh SN, Banerjee R, Sethunathan N, Adhya TK, Rao VR, Palit P, Saha AK, Purkait NN, Chaturvedi GS, Sen SP, Sen M, Sarkar B, Banik A, Subbaraya BH, Lal S & Venkatramani S (1994) Methane budget from Indian paddy fields. In: Minami K, Mosier A & Sass RL (eds) CH4 and N2O: Global Emissions and Controls from Rice Fields and Other Agricultural and Industrial Sources, pp 27–39, Tsukuba, Japan: NIAES Series 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponnamperuma FN (1972) The chemistry of submerged soils. Adv Agron 24:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan V, Cicerone RJ, Singh HB & Kiehl JT (1985) Trace gas trends and their potential role in climate change. J Geophys Res 90:5547–5566

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennenberg H, Wassmann R, Papen H & Seiler W (1992) Trace gas exchange in rice cultivation. Ecol Bull 42:164–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass RL, Fisher FM, Haracombe PA & Turner FT (1990) Methane production and emission in a Texas rice field. Global Biogeochem Cycles 4:47–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass RL, Fisher FM, Harcombe PA & Turner FT (1991) Mitigation of methane emissions from rice fields: possible adverse effects of incorporated rice straw. Global Biogeochem Cycles 5:275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz H, Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R, Rennenberg H & Seiler W (1989) A three-year continuous record on the influence of daytime season and fertilizer treatment on methane emission rates from an Italian rice paddy field. J Geophys Res 94:16405–16416

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler W, Conrad R & Scharffe D (1984) Field studies of methane emission from termite nests into the atmosphere and measurements of methane uptake by tropical soils. J Atmos Chem 1:171–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha SK (1995) Global methane emission from rice paddies: Excellent methodology but poor extrapolation. Curr Sci 68 (6):643–646

    Google Scholar 

  • US-Environmental Protection Agency (1991) Methane emissions and opportunities for control. EPA/400/9-90/9007, US EPA, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Neue HU & Samonte HP (1997) Effect of cultivar difference ('IR72', ‘IR65598’ and ‘Dular’) on methane emission. Agric Ecosyst Environ 62:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann R, Neue HU, Lantin RL, Aduna JB, Alberto MC, Andales MJ, Tan MJ, Denier van der Gon HAC, Hoffmann H, Papen H, Rennenberg H & Seiler W (1994) Temporal patterns of methane emissions from wetland ricefields treated by different modes of N application. J Geophys Res 99:16457–16462

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann R, Wang MX, Shangguan XJ, Xie XL, Shen RX, Papen H, Rennenberg H & Seiler W (1993) First records of a field experiment on fertilizer effects on methane emission from rice fields in Hunan Province (PR China). Geophys Res Lett 20:2071–2074

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann R, Neue HU, Bueno C, Lantin RS, Alberto MCR, Buendia LV, Bronson K, Papen H & Rennenberg H (1998) Methane production capacities of different rice soils derived from inherent and exogenous substrates. Plant Soil 203:227–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann R, Neue HU Lantin RS, Buendia LV & Rennenberg H (2000a) Characterization of methane emissions from rice fields in Asia 1. Comparison among field sites in five countries. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst, this issue

  • Wassmann R, Neue HU, Lantin RS, Makarim K, Chareonsilp N, Buendia LV & Rennenberg H (2000b) Characterization of methane emissions from rice fields in Asia 2. Differences among irrigated, rainfed and deepwater ecosystems. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst, this issue

  • Yagi, K, Minami K & Ogawa Y (1990) Effects of water percolation on methane emission from paddy fields. Res Rep Div Environ Planning, National Institute of Agro-Environmental Sciences 6:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagi K, Tsuruta H & Kanda K (1994) Effect of water management on methane emission from rice paddy fields. Res Rep Div Environ Planning, National Institute of Agro-Environmental Sciences 10:61–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jain, M., Kumar, S., Wassmann, R. et al. Methane Emissions from Irrigated Rice Fields in Northern India (New Delhi). Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 58, 75–83 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009882216720

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009882216720

Navigation