Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling Relationships among Multiple Graphical Structures

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many researchers have investigated the social and cognitive processes underlying organizational behavior, with particular interest in understanding the interaction between the social and cognitive dimensions. Because of the widespread use of graphs as models of social and cognitive structures, these studies frequently encounter the problem of analyzing collections of graphical structures. Such analyses have used a variety of approaches to address specific aspects of such structures. However, no single unified approach has emerged that supports the several different types of analyses required. The purpose of this paper is to define such an approach, based on a mathematical model for capturing the relationships among multiple graphs, and to demonstrate its application to the investigation of social and cognitive structures in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod, R. (Ed.) (1976), Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, D. and K. Carley (1994), “Metric Inference for Social Networks,” Journal of Classification, 11, 121–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthélemy, J.P. and B. Monjardet (1981), “The Median Procedure in Cluster Analysis and Social Choice Theory,” Mathematical Social Sciences, 1, 235–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchelder, W.H., E. Kumbasar and J.P. Boyd (1997), “Consensus Analysis of Three-Way Social Network Data,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 22(1), 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behzad, M., G. Chartrand and L. Lesniak (1979), Graphs and Digraphs, Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougon, M., K. Weick and D. Binkhorst (1977), “Cognition in Organizations: An Analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 606–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, D.D. (1992), “A Note on the Relationship Between Centrality and Cultural Knowledge in a Professional Network,” Connections, 15, 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, F. and F. Harary (1990), Distance in Graphs, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. (1986), “An Approach for Relating Social Structure to Cognitive Structure,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 12(2), 137–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. (1997), “Extracting Team Mental Models Through Textual Analysis,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 533–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. (1999), “On the Evolution of Social and Organizational Networks,” in S.B. Andrews and D. Knoke (Eds.) Special Issue of Research in the Sociology of Organizations onNetworks in and Around Organizations,” Vol. 16, JAI press, Inc. Stanford, CT, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, N.S., D. Zink and M. Chan (1998), “IKNOW: A Tool to Assist and Study the Creation, Maintenance, and Dissolution of Knowledge Networks,” in T. Ishida (Ed.) Community Computing and Support Systems, Vol. 1519, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W.N. and A. Ginsberg (1986), “A Sociocognitive Network Approach to Organizational Analysis,” Human Relations, 39(11), 955–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J.D. and W.H. Hegarty (1984), “Decision Makers' Beliefs About the Causes and Effects of Structure: An Exploratory Study,” Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L.C. (1977), “A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness,” Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, C.F. (1981), Modern Algebra, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gernert, D. (1981), “Distance or Similarity Measures Which Respect the Internal Structure of the Objects,” Methods of Operations Research, 43, 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, W. and H.C. Swart (1996), “Distances Between Graphs Under Edge Operations,” Discrete Mathematics, 161(1-3), 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J.A. (1976), “Comparative Cognition: Politics of International Control of the Oceans,” in R. Axelrod (Ed.) Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrion, M., J.S. Breese and E.J. Horvitz (1991), “Decision Analysis and Expert Systems,” AI Magazine, 12(4), 64–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R.A. (1989), “Knowledge Maps,” Management Science, 35(8), 903–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameda, T., Y. Ohtsubo and M. Takezawa (1997), “Centrality in Sociogcognitive Networks and Social Influence: An Illustration in a Group Decision-Making Context,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 296–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D. (1987), “Cognitive Social Structures,” Social Networks, 9, 109–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraiger, K. and L.H. Wenzel (1997), “Conceptual Development and Empirical Evaluation of Measures of Shared Mental Models as Indicators of Team Effectiveness,” in M.T. Brannick, E. Salas and C. Prince (Eds.), Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langfield-Smith, K. and A. Wirth (1992), “Measuring Differences Between Cognitive Maps,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43(12), 1135–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., J.F. Courtney, Jr. and R.M. O'Keefe (1992), “A System for Organizational Learning Using Cognitive Maps,” Omega, 20(1), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, A.P. and W.A. Wallace (1996), “Understanding and Facilitating Group Problem Structuring and Formulation: Mental Representations, Interaction, and Representation Aids,” Decision Support Systems, 17, 253–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMorris, F.R. (1990), “The Median Procedure for n-Trees as a Maximum Likelihood Method,” Journal of Classification, 7, 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça, D., R. Rush and W.A. Wallace (1998), “Knowledge Elicitation from Distributed Experts,” Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Decision Sciences and Engineering Systems, Troy, NY, manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R.M. and J.Q. Smith (Eds.) (1990), Influence Diagrams, Belief Nets and Decision Analysis, JohnWiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, P. (1994), “Social Cognition in Context: Some Applications of Social Network Analysis,” in S. Wasserman and J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.) Advances in Social Network Analysis, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. and T.J. Warnow (1996), “The Asymmetric Median Tree-A New Model for Building Consensus Trees,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, 71, 311–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney, A.K. and S.C. Weller (1984), “Predicting Informant Accuracy From Patterns of Recall Among Individuals,” Social Networks, 6, 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush, R. and W.A. Wallace (1997), “Elicitation of Knowledge From Multiple Experts Using Network Inference,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 9(5), 688–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobik, F. and E. Sommerfeld (1982), “A Graph Theoretic Approach for Representation and Classification of Structured Objects,” Paper presented at the 1982 European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Orsay, France.

  • Walker, G. (1985), “Network Position and Cognition in a Computer Software Firm,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(1), 103–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J.P. (1995), “Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes From a Trip Down Memory Lane,” Organization Science, 6(3), 280–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994), Social Network Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. and D.M. Worlfe (1966), “Cognitive Consequences of a Person's Position in a Formal Organization,” Human Relations, 19(2), 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chopra, K., Wallace, W.A. Modeling Relationships among Multiple Graphical Structures. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 6, 361–379 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009658313423

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009658313423

Navigation