Advertisement

The VOT of the Hungarian Voiceless Plosives in Words and in Spontaneous Speech

  • Mária Gósy
Article

Abstract

Due to the various techniques used in experimental phonetics and the language inventories, more and more has been learned about the nature of stops of the world's languages. Stop consonants occur in all languages, with voiceless unaspirated stops being the most common. The differences in voice onset time (VOT) have been termed lead vs. short lag, where VOT itself is defined as the timing between the onset of phonation and the release of the occlusion of the vocal tract.

For Hungarian, no systematic analysis of the stops has been carried out thus far. This paper aims to investigate the acoustic and perceptual properties of VOTs of the three Hungarian voiceless stops when they appear in isolation (in syllables and in words) but also when they occur in spontaneous speech.

The results of the acoustic analysis show a clear difference between careful and spontaneous speech. Bilabials and velars are significantly shorter in fluent speech than in careful speech (18.51 msec and 35.31 msec respectively, as opposed to 24.64 msec and 50.17 msec) while dentals seem to be unchanged (23.3 msec as opposed to 26.59 msec). Therefore, the actual duration of VOT is characteristic of the place of the articulation of stops in spontaneous speech, and VOTs of bilabials and dentals do not differ from each other in careful speech. Vowels following the stops influence them more in careful than in spontaneous speech, which can also be explained by the experimentally confirmed phenomenon of the changing quality of the present-day Hungarian vowels into the neutral vowel. Voice onset time is a specific feature of the Hungarian unaspirated plosive consonants. A further experiment was carried out to define the actual function of the VOTs of the voiceless stops in the Hungarian listeners' perception.

voice onset time plosives articulation differences primary acoustic cue context dependency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson, A. and Lisker, L. (1973). Voice-timing perception in Spanish word-initial stops. Journal of Phonetics, 1:1–8.Google Scholar
  2. Basso, A., Casati, G., and Vignolo, L.A. (1977). Phonemic identification defects in aphasia. Cortex, 13:84–95.Google Scholar
  3. Baum, S.R., Blumstein, S.E., Naeser, M.A., and Palumbo, C.L. (1990). Temporal dimensions of consonant and vowel production: An acoustic and CT scan analysis of aphasic speech. Brain and Language, 39:33–56.Google Scholar
  4. Cho, T. and Ladefoged, P. (1997). Variations and universals in VOT: Evidence from 17 endangered languages. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 95, pp. 18–41.Google Scholar
  5. Connine, C. and Clifton, C. (1987). Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13:291–299.Google Scholar
  6. Denes, P. (1955). Effect of duration on the perception of voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27:761–764.Google Scholar
  7. Eimas, P., Siqueland, E.R., Jusczyk, P., and Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in early infancy. Science, 171:304–306.Google Scholar
  8. Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1972). Perceptual studies of Danish stop consonants (Annual Report 6). Copenhagen: Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen, pp. 75–176.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1979).Temporal relations in consonant-vowel syllables with stop consonants based on Danish material. In B. Lindblom S. and Öhman T. (Eds.), Frontiers of Speech Communication Research. New York: Academic Press, pp. 51–88.Google Scholar
  10. Flege, J.E. and Eefting, W. (1986). Linguistics and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica, 43:155–171.Google Scholar
  11. Gandour, J. and Dardarananda, R. (1984). Voice onset time in aphasia: Thai II. Production. Brain and Language, 23:177–205.Google Scholar
  12. Gósy, M. (1991). The perception of tempo. In M. Gósy (Ed.), Temporal Factors in Speech. Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézete, pp. 63–107.Google Scholar
  13. Gósy, M. (1997). A magánhangzók minóségváltozásai a spontán beszédben. (Changing qualities of vowels in spontaneous speech.) Magyar Nyelvór, 121:45–56.Google Scholar
  14. Haggard, M., Ambler, S., and Callow, M. (1970). Pitch as a voicing cue. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 47:613–617.Google Scholar
  15. Han, S.M. (1992). The timing control of geminate and single stop consonants in Japanese: A challenge for nonnative speakers. Phonetica, 49:102–128.Google Scholar
  16. Hazan, V.L. and Boulakia, G. (1993). Perception and production of a voicing contrast by French-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 36:17–39.Google Scholar
  17. Hazan, V. and Shi, B. (1995). Individual variability in the perceptual weighting of cues to stop place and voicing contrast. In K. Elenius and P. Branderud (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Stockholm: University of Stockholm, Vol. 2, pp. 506–509.Google Scholar
  18. Henton, C., Ladefoged, P., and Maddieson, I. (1992). Stops in the world's languages. Phonetica, 49:65–101.Google Scholar
  19. Hirsch, I.J. and Sherrick, C.E. (1961). Perceived order in different sense modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62:423–432.Google Scholar
  20. Klatt, D.H. (1975). Voice onset time, frication and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18:686–706.Google Scholar
  21. Laver, J. (1994). Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lieberman, P. and Blumstein, S. (1988). Speech Physiology, Speech Perception, and Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lisker, L. and Abramson, A.S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops. Word, 20:384–422.Google Scholar
  24. Lisker, L. and Abramson, A.S. (1967).Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10:1–28.Google Scholar
  25. Lisker, L. and Abramson, A.S. (1971). Distinctive features and laryngeal control. Language, 47:767–785.Google Scholar
  26. Olaszy, G. (1985). A magyar beszéd leggyakoribb hangsorépít? elemeinekakusztikai elemzése és szintézise. (The acoustic analysis and synthesis of the most frequent building elements of the Hungarian speech.) Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  27. Pickett, J.M., Bunnell, H.T., and Revoile, S.G. (1995). Phonetics of intervocalic consonant perception. Phonetica, 52:1–40.Google Scholar
  28. Poon, P.G. and Mateer, C.A. (1985). A study of VOT in Nepali stop consonants. Phonetica, 42:39–47.Google Scholar
  29. Repp, B.H. (1979). Aspiration amplitude as a voicing cue for syllable-initial stop consonants presented monoaurally and in dichotic competition (Status Report on Speech Research, SR-57, 85–111). Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  30. Saerens, M., Serniclaes, W., and Beekmans, R. (1989). Acoustic versus contextual factors in stop voicing perception in spontaneous French. Language and Speech, 32:291–315.Google Scholar
  31. Schmidt, A.M. and Flege, J.E. (1995). Effects of speaking rate changes on native and nonnative speech production. Phonetica, 52:41–54.Google Scholar
  32. Shimizu, K. (1996). A Cross-Language Study of Voicing Contrasts of Stop Consonants in Asian Languages. Tokyo: Seibido Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Siptár, P. (1997). A magyar mássalhangzók fonológiája. (The phonology of the Hungarian consonants.) Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézete.Google Scholar
  34. Stevens, K.N. and Blumstein, S. (1981). The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features. In P.D. Eimas and J.L. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives in the Study of Speech. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
  35. Stevens, K.N. and Klatt, D.H. (1974). Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction for stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55:653–659.Google Scholar
  36. Summerfield, Q. (1975). Aerodynamics versus mechanics in the control of voicing onset in consonant-vowel syllables. Speech Perception 4. Belfast: Department of Psychology, Queen's University.Google Scholar
  37. Veloso, J. (1995). The role of consonantal duration and tenseness in the perception of voicing distinctions of Portuguese stops. In K. Elenius and P. Branderud (Eds.), In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Stockholm: University of Stockholm, Vol. 2, pp. 266–270.Google Scholar
  38. Williams, L. (1977). The voicing contrast in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 5:169–184.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mária Gósy
    • 1
  1. 1.Budapest and Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of SciencesEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations