Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 5–24 | Cite as

Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences

  • N. E. Mcintyre
  • K. Knowles-Yánez
  • D. Hope

Abstract

“If you wish to converse with me, define your terms.”

—attributed to Voltaire, The Home Book of Quotations: Classical and Modern, Fourth edition (B. Stevenson, ed.), p. 428, Dodd, Mead and Co., New York, NY, 1944

Though there is a growing appreciation of the importance of research on urban ecosystems, the question of what constitutes an urban ecosystem remains. Although a human-dominated ecosystem is sometimes considered to be an accurate description of an urban ecosystem, describing an ecosystem as human-dominated does not adequately take into account the history of development, sphere of influence, and potential impacts required in order to understand the true nature of an urban ecosystem. While recognizing that no single definition of “urban” is possible or even necessary, we explore the importance of attaching an interdisciplinary, quantitative, and considered description of an urban ecosystem such that projects and findings are easier to compare, repeat, and build upon. Natural science research about urban ecosystems, particularly in the field of ecology, often includes only a tacit assumption about what urban means. Following the lead of a more developed social science literature on urban issues, we make suggestions towards a consistent, quantitative description of urban that would take into account the dynamic and heterogeneous physical and social characteristics of an urban ecosystem. We provide case studies that illustrate how social and natural scientists might collaborate in research where a more clearly understood definition of “urban” would be desirable.

urban social science ecology definition of “urban” 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aber, J.D. (1993) Modification of nitrogen cycling at the regional scale: The subtle effects of atmospheric deposition. In Humans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas (M.J. McDonnell and S.T.A. Pickett, eds.), pp. 163–174. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, C.C. (1935) The relation of general ecology to human ecology. Ecology 16, 316–335.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, C.C. (1940) Introductory note. Ecological Monographs 10, 309–310.Google Scholar
  4. Alberti, M. (1999) Urban patterns and environmental performance: What do we know? Journal of Planning Education and Research 19, 151–163.Google Scholar
  5. Blair, R.B. (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6, 506–519.Google Scholar
  6. Blair, R.B. and Launer, A.E. (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: Species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological Conservation 80, 113–125.Google Scholar
  7. Blanco, G. and Velasco, T. (1996) Bird-habitat relationships in an urban park during winter. Folia Zoologica 45, 35–42.Google Scholar
  8. Bormann, F.H. and Likens, G. (1979) Patterns and Processes in a Forested Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Botkin, D.B. and Beveridge, C.E. (1997) Cities as environments. Urban Ecosystems 1, 3–19.Google Scholar
  10. Brockerhoff, M. (1996) ‘City summit’ to address global urbanization. Population Today 24(3), 4–5.Google Scholar
  11. Bullard, R.D. (1990) Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  12. Cernea, M.M., ed. (1991) Putting People First: Socioecological Variables in Rural Development (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Cicero, C. (1989) Avian community structure in a large urban park: Controls of local richness and diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning 17, 221–240.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, T.E. and Samways, M.J. (1997) Sampling arthropod diversity for urban ecological landscaping in a speciesrich southern hemisphere botanic garden. Journal of Insect Conservation 1, 221–234.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, J.P., Kinzig, A., Grimm, N.B., Fagan, W.F., Hope, D., Wu, J. and Borer, E.T. (2000) A new urban economy. American Scientist.Google Scholar
  16. Costanza, R. (1996) Ecological economics: Reintegrating the study of humans and nature. Ecological Applications 6, 978–990.Google Scholar
  17. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., deGroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. and vandenBelt, M. (1997) The value of the world' ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260.Google Scholar
  18. Czechowski, W. (1982) Occurrence of carabids (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the urban greenery of Warsaw according to the land utilization and cultivation. Memorabilia Zoologica 39, 3–108.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, B.N.K. (1978) Urbanisation and the diversity of insects. Biological Conservation 10, 249–291.Google Scholar
  20. DeGraaf, R.M. and Wentworth, J.M. (1981) Urban bird communities and habitats in New England. Transactions of the North American Wildlife Conference 46, 396–413.Google Scholar
  21. Diamond, J. (1986) Overview: Laboratory experiments, field experiments, and natural experiments. In Community Ecology (J. Diamond and T.J. Case, eds.), pp. 3–22. Harper and Row, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Dulisz, B. and Nowakowski, J.J. (1996) The species diversity of the avifauna in built-up areas in the city of Olsztyn (NE Poland). Acta Ornithologica 31, 33–38.Google Scholar
  23. Edgar, D.R. and Kershaw, G.P. (1994) The density and diversity of the bird populations in three residential communities in Edmonton, Alberta. Canadian Field-Naturalist 108, 156–161.Google Scholar
  24. Ehler, L.E. and Frankie, G.W. (1979a) Arthropod fauna of live oak in urban and natural stands in Texas. II. Characteristics of the mite fauna (Acari). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 52, 86–92.Google Scholar
  25. Ehler, L.E. and Frankie, G.W. (1979b) Arthropod fauna of live oak in urban and natural stands in Texas. III. Oribatid mite fauna (Acari). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 52, 344–348.Google Scholar
  26. Ellis, A.W., Hildebrandt, M.L., Thomas, W.M. and Fernando, H.J.S. (In press) A case study of the climatic mechanisms contributing to the transport of lower atmospheric ozone across metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Climate Research.Google Scholar
  27. Emlen, J.T. (1974) An urban bird community in Tucson, Arizona: Derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76, 1184–197.Google Scholar
  28. Erskine, A.J. (1992) Urban area, commercial and residential. American Birds 26, 1000.Google Scholar
  29. Erz, W. (1964) Ecological principles in the urbanization of birds. Ostrich (Suppl.) 6, 357–363.Google Scholar
  30. Ewing, R. (1997) Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association 63, 107–126.Google Scholar
  31. Faeth, S.H. and Kane, T.C. (1978) Urban biogeography: City parks as islands for Diptera and Coleoptera. Oecologia 32, 127–133.Google Scholar
  32. Fainstein, S.S. (1994) The City Builders: Property, Politics, and Planning in London and New York. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Fisher, S.G. (1997) Creativity, idea generation, and the functional morphology of streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16, 305–318.Google Scholar
  34. Folke, C., Jansson, A., Larsson, J. and Costanza, R. (1997) Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio 26, 167–172.Google Scholar
  35. Forbes, D. (1997) Metropolis and megaurban regions in Pacific Asia. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 88, 457–468.Google Scholar
  36. Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. (1986) Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  37. Frankie, G.W. and Ehler, L.E. (1978) Ecology of insects in urban environments. Annual Review of Entomology 23, 367–387.Google Scholar
  38. Friesen, L.E., Eagles, P.F.J. and MacKay, R.J. (1995) Effects of residential development on forest-dwelling Neotropical migrant songbirds. Conservation Biology 9, 1408–1414.Google Scholar
  39. Glaeser, E.L. (1998) Are cities dying? Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, 139–161.Google Scholar
  40. Goszczynski, J., Jablonski, P., Lesinski, G. and Romanowski, J. (1993) Variation in diet of Tawny Owl Strix aluco L along an urbanization gradient. Acta Ornithologica 27, 113–123.Google Scholar
  41. Grimmond, C.S.B. and Oke, T.R. (1986) Urban Water Balance 2. Results from a suburb of Vancouver, British Colombia. Water Resources Research 22, 1404–1412.Google Scholar
  42. Grove J.M. and Burch, W.R. Jr. (1997) A social ecology approach and applications of urban ecosystem and landscape analyses: A case study of Baltimore, Maryland. Urban Ecosystems 1, 259–275.Google Scholar
  43. Guthrie, D.A. (1974) Suburban bird population in southern California. American Midland Naturalist 92, 461–466.Google Scholar
  44. Hadidian, J., Sauer, J., Swarth, C., Handly, P., Droege, S., Williams, C., Huff, J. and Didden, G. (1997) A citywide breeding bird survey for Washington, D.C. Urban Ecosystems 1, 87–102.Google Scholar
  45. Hendrix, W.G., Fabos, J.G. and Price, J.E. (1988) An ecological approach to landscape planning using geographic information system technology. Landscape and Urban Planning 15, 211–225.Google Scholar
  46. Herzog, T.R. (1989) A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 9, 27–43.Google Scholar
  47. Herzog, T.R. and Chernick, K.K. (2000) Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 20, 29–39.Google Scholar
  48. Hohtola, E. (1978) Differential changes in bird community structure with urbanisation: A study in central Finland. Ornis Scandinavica 9, 94–100.Google Scholar
  49. Hooper, R.G., Smith, E.F., Crawford, H.S., McGinnes, B.S. and Walker, V.J. (1975) Nesting bird populations in a new town. Wildlife Society Bulletin 3, 111–118.Google Scholar
  50. Huhtalo, H. and Jarvinen, O. (1977) Quantitative composition of the urban bird community in Tornio, northern Finland. Bird Study 24, 179–185.Google Scholar
  51. Jim, C.Y. (1998) Impacts of intensive urbanization on trees in Hong Kong. Environmental Conservation 25, 146–159.Google Scholar
  52. Jokimaki, J. and Suhonen, J. (1993) Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: A biogeographical comparison. Ornis Fennica 70, 71–77.Google Scholar
  53. Jones, R.C. and Clark, C.C. (1987) Impact ofwatershed urbanization on stream insect communities. Water Research Bulletin 23, 1047–1055.Google Scholar
  54. Kaplan, S. (1987) Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preferences from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior 19, 3–32.Google Scholar
  55. Kaplan, S., Kaplan, R. and Wendt, J.S. (1972) Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material. Perception and Psychophysics 12, 354–356.Google Scholar
  56. Kemp, S.J. and Spotila, J.R. (1997) Effects of urbanization on brown trout Salmo trutta, other fishes and macroinvertebrates in Valley Creek, Valley Forge, Pennsylvania. American Midland Naturalist 138, 55–69.Google Scholar
  57. Klausnitzer, B. and Richter, K. (1983) Presence of an urban gradient demonstrated for carabid associations. Oecologia 59, 79–82.Google Scholar
  58. Kotliar, N.B. and Wiens, J.A. (1990) Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: A hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59, 253–260.Google Scholar
  59. Kozlov, M. (1996) Patterns of forest insect distribution within a large city: Microlepidoptera in St. Peterburg, Russia. Journal of Biogeography 23, 95–103.Google Scholar
  60. Lancaster, R.K. and Rees, W.E. (1979) Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57, 2358–2368.Google Scholar
  61. Lindeman, E.C. (1940) Ecology: An instrument for the integration of science and philosophy. Ecological Monographs 10, 367–372.Google Scholar
  62. Mack, R.N. (1999) Two recommendations for more rapid publication in ESA journals: Observations of a subject editor. ESA Bulletin 80, 83–84.Google Scholar
  63. Macura, M. (1961) The influence of the definition of urban place on the size of urban population. In Urban Research Methods (J. Gibbs, ed.), pp. 21–31. Van Nostrand, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  64. Majzlan, O. and Holecova, M. (1993) Anthropocoenoses of an orchard ecosystem in urban agglomerations. Ekologia (Bratislava) 12, 121–129.Google Scholar
  65. Matson. P. (1990) The use of urban gradient in ecological studies. Ecology 71, 1231.Google Scholar
  66. McDonnell, M.J. (1997) A paradigm shift. Urban Ecosystems 1, 85–86.Google Scholar
  67. McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: An unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71, 1232–1237.Google Scholar
  68. McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., Groffman, P., Bohlen, P., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.C., Parmelee, R.W., Carreiro, M.M. and Medley, K. (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1, 21–36.Google Scholar
  69. McGeoch, M.A. and Chown, S.L. (1997) Impact of urbanization on a gall-inhabiting Lepidoptera assemblage: The importance of reserves in urban areas. Biodiversity Conservation 6, 979–993.Google Scholar
  70. McIntyre, N.E. (1999) Influences of urban land use on the frequency of scorpion stings in the Phoenix, Arizona, metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning 45, 47–55.Google Scholar
  71. Medley, K.E., McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1995) Forest-landscape structure along an urban-to-rural gradient. Professional Geographer 47, 159–168.Google Scholar
  72. Mills, E.S. and Hamilton, B.W., eds. (1989) Urban Economics (4th ed.). HarperCollins, Glenview, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  73. Mirabella, P., Fraissinet, M. and Milone, M. (1996) Breeding birds and territorial heterogeneity in Naples city (Italy). Acta Ornithologica 31, 25–31.Google Scholar
  74. Natuhara, Y. and Imai, C. (1996) Spatial structure of avifauna along urban-rural gradients. Ecological Research 11, 1–9.Google Scholar
  75. Natuhara, Y., Imai, C. and Takeda, H. (1994) Classification and ordination of communities of soil arthropods in an urban park of Osaka City. Ecological Research 9, 131–141.Google Scholar
  76. Nowakowski, E. (1986) Structure of soil click beetle (Coleoptera, Elateridae) communities in urban green areas of Warsaw. Memorabilia Zoologica 41, 81–102.Google Scholar
  77. Nuorteva, P. (1971) The synanthropy of birds as an expression of the ecological cycle disorder caused by urbanization. Annales Zoologici Fennici 8, 547–553.Google Scholar
  78. Odum, E.P. (1997) Ecology: A Bridge Between Science and Society. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  79. Palmer, J.F. and Lankhorst, J.R.-K. (1998) Evaluating visible spatial diversity in the landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 43, 65–78.Google Scholar
  80. Park, R.E., Burgess, E.W. and McKenzie, R.D., eds. (1925) The City. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  81. Parlange, M. (1998) The city as ecosystem. BioScience 48, 581–585.Google Scholar
  82. Pickett, S.T.A., Burch, W.R. and Dalton, S.E. (1997) Integrated urban ecosystem research. Urban Ecosystems 1, 183–184.Google Scholar
  83. Pickett, S.T.A. and McDonnell, M.J. (1993) Humans as components of ecosystems: A synthesis. In Humans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas (M. J. McDonnell and S.T.A. Pickett, eds.), pp. 310–316. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  84. Plaza, J., Pujadas, M. and Artinano, B. (1997) Formation and transport of the Madrid ozone plume. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 47, 766–774.Google Scholar
  85. Pond, B. and Yeates, M. (1994) Rural/urban land conversion II: Identifying land in transition to urban use. Urban Geography 15, 25.Google Scholar
  86. Pouyat, R.V., Parmelee, R.W. and Carreiro, M.M. (1994) Environmental effects of forest soil-invertebrate and fungal densities in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient. Pedobiologia 38, 385–399.Google Scholar
  87. Rebele, F. (1994) Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 4, 173–187.Google Scholar
  88. Rees, W.E. (1996) Revisiting carrying capacity: Area-based indicators of sustainability. Population and Environment 17, 195–215.Google Scholar
  89. Rodick, J.E. (1995) Landscape and Urban Planning: The journal' role in communicating progress in the evolution of future urban environments. Landscape and Urban Planning 32, 3–5.Google Scholar
  90. Rosenberg, K.V., Terrill, S.B. and Rosenberg, G.H. (1987) Value of suburban habitats to desert riparian birds. Wilson Bulletin 99, 642–654.Google Scholar
  91. Ruszczyk, A. and de Araujo, A.M. (1992) Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 46, 255–264.Google Scholar
  92. Ruszczyk, A., Rodrigues, J.J.S., Roberts, T.M.T., Bendati, M.M.A., del Pino, R.S., Marques, J.C.V. and M.T.Q. Melo, M.T.Q. (1987) Distribution patterns of eight bird species in the urbanization gradient of Porto Alegre, Brazil. Ciencia e Cultura 39, 14–19.Google Scholar
  93. Sewell, S.R. and Catterall, C.P. (1998) Bushland modification and styles of urban development: Their effects on birds in south-east Queensland. Wildlife Research 25, 41–63.Google Scholar
  94. Sillman, S. (1999) The relation between ozone, NOx and hydrocarbons in urban and polluted rural environments. Atmospheric Environment 33, 1821–1845.Google Scholar
  95. Simpson, J.R. (1993) Urbanization, agro-ecological zones and food production sustainability. Outlook in Agriculture 22, 233–239.Google Scholar
  96. Speight, M.R., Hails, R.S., Gilbert, M. and Foggo, A. (1998) Horse chestnut scale (Pulvinaria regalis) (Homoptera: Coccidae) and urban host tree environment. Ecology 79, 1503–1513.Google Scholar
  97. Stearns, F. and Montag, T., eds. (1974) The Urban Ecosystem: A Holistic Approach. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  98. Sukkopp, H. (1990) Urban ecology and its application in Europe. In Urban Ecology (K. Sukkopp, S. Hejny and I. Kowarik, eds.), pp. 1–22. Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  99. Sustek, Z. (1987) Changes in body size structure of carabid communities (Coleoptera, Carabidae) along an urbanisation gradient. Biologia. Bratislava/ 42, 145–156.Google Scholar
  100. Sustek, Z. (1992) Changes in the representation of carabid life forms along an urbanisation gradient (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Biologia. Bratislava/ 47, 417–430.Google Scholar
  101. Sustek, Z. (1993) Changes in body size structure of staphylinid communities (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) along an urbanisation gradient. Biologia. Bratislava/ 48, 523–533.Google Scholar
  102. Tischler, W. (1973) Ecology of arthropod fauna in man-made habitats. Zoologisher Anzeiger 191, 157–161.Google Scholar
  103. Trojan, P. (1981) Urban fauna: Faunistic, zoogeographical and ecological problems. Memorabilia Zoologica 34, 3–12.Google Scholar
  104. Ulrich, R.S. (1981) Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior 13, 532–556.Google Scholar
  105. Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, E.F., Miles, M.A. and Zelson, M. (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11, 201–230.Google Scholar
  106. United Nations. (1968) Demographic Handbook for Africa. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  107. U.S. Bureau of the Census. URL: http://www.census.gov/population/censusdata/urdef.txtGoogle Scholar
  108. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. and Verbruggen, H. (1999) Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: An evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’. Ecological Economics 29, 61–72.Google Scholar
  109. Vincent, L.S. and Frankie, G.W. (1985) Arthropod fauna of live oak in urban and natural stands in Texas. IV. The spider fauna (Araneae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 58, 378–385.Google Scholar
  110. Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. and Melillo, J.M. (1997) Human domination of Earth' ecosystems. Science 277, 494–499.Google Scholar
  111. Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W.E. (1997) Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecological Economics 20, 3–24.Google Scholar
  112. Walbridge, M.R. (1997) Urban ecosystems. Urban Ecosystems 1, 1–2.Google Scholar
  113. Walcott, C.F. (1974) Changes in bird life in Cambridge, Massachusetts from 1860 to 1964. Auk 91, 151–160.Google Scholar
  114. Wear, D.N. and Bolstad, P. (1998) Land-use changes in southern Appalachian landscapes: Spatial analysis and forecast evaluation. Ecosystems 1, 575–594.Google Scholar
  115. Weber, W.C. (1975) Nest-sites of birds in residential areas of Vancouver, British Columbia. Canadian Field-Naturalist 89, 457–460.Google Scholar
  116. Weddle, A.E. (1986) Landscape and urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 13, 165–167.Google Scholar
  117. Weitz, J. and Moore, T. (1998) Development inside urban growth boundaries-Oregon' empirical evidence of contiguous urban form. Journal of the American Planning Association 64, 424–440.Google Scholar
  118. Woolfenden, G.E. and Rohwer, S.A. (1969a) Bird populations in the suburbs and twowoodland habitats in Pinellas County, Florida. Journal of the Florida State Board of Health 12, 101–109.Google Scholar
  119. Woolfenden, G.E. and Rohwer, S.A. (1969b) Breeding birds in a Florida suburb. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 13, 1–83.Google Scholar
  120. World Bank. (1984) World Development Report. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  121. Yalden, D.W. (1980) Urban small mammals. Journal of Zoology 191, 403–406.Google Scholar
  122. Zapparoli, M. (1997) Urban development and insect biodiversity of the Rome area, Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning 38, 77–86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. E. Mcintyre
    • 1
  • K. Knowles-Yánez
    • 2
  • D. Hope
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.Liberal Studies ProgramCalifornia State UniversitySan MarcosUSA
  3. 3.Center for Environmental StudiesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations