Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 133–150 | Cite as

Qualitative Cancer Genetic Counseling Research, Part I: Ethnography in a Cancer Clinic

  • June A. Peters
  • Carol L. McAllister
  • Wendy S. Rubinstein
Article

Abstract

This is a report of the experience of several months' ethnographic research by a genetic counselor researcher in a cancer treatment clinic. One goal of the exercise was to directly experience a method of qualitative research known as ethnography, which relies heavily on participant-observation, in an applied clinical setting. Another goal was to explore a previously undescribed research area in the genetic counseling literature, namely, the meaning of cancer and cancer treatment for affected individuals and their support companions. Here we report on a personal account of the experiences of conducting and publishing the research. The preliminary analysis and results of this field experience are published elsewhere (Peters et al. (2001) J Genet Counsel 10(2):151–168.). These initial findings support the feasibility of genetic counselors, who are trained in specific social science methodologies, to conduct qualitative research pertinent to genetic counseling practice.

hereditary cancer genetic counseling qualitative behavioral psychosocial research ethnography anthropology participant-observation family 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Atkinson P, Hammersley M (1995) Ethnography. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Beeson D (1997) Nuance, complexity, and context: Qualitative methods in genetic counseling research. J Genet Counsel 6:21–44.Google Scholar
  3. Beeson D, Golbus MS (1979) Anxiety engendered by amniocentesis. Birth Defects 15:191–197.Google Scholar
  4. Benkendorf JL, Callanan NP, Grobstein R, Schmerler S, Fitzgerald KT (1992) An explication of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) Code of Ethics. Genet Counsel 1:31–40.Google Scholar
  5. Blau P (1986) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  6. Chapple A, May C, Campion P (2000) Lay understanding of genetic disease: A Brittish study of families attending a genetic counseling service. J Genet Counsel 4:281–300.Google Scholar
  7. DeMarrais K (1998) Inside Stories: Qualitative Research Reflections. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Denzin N, Lincoln Y (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Fetterman D (1998) Ethnography: Step by Step. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Green J, Richards M, Murton F, Statham H, Hallowell N (1997) Family communication and genetic counseling: The case of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. J Genet Counsel 6:45–60.Google Scholar
  11. Hallowell N, Richards MPM (1997) Understanding life's lottery. J Health Psychol 2:31–43.Google Scholar
  12. Hallowell N, Statham H, Murton F, Green J, Richards M (1997) “Talking about chance”: The presentation of risk information during genetic counseling for breast and ovarian cancer. J Genet Counsel 6:269–286.Google Scholar
  13. Hammersley M, Atkinson P (1995) Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Kenen R, Smith ACM, Watkins C, Zuber-Pittore C (1997) To use or not to use?: Factors involved in decision-making regarding genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis from the male partners perspective. J Genet Counsel 6:443, 444.Google Scholar
  15. Lareau A, Shultz J (2000) Journeys Through Ethnography. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lippman-Hand AL, Fraser FC (1979) Genetic counseling: Provision and reception of information. Am J Med Genet 3:113–127.Google Scholar
  17. OPRR (2000) Protecting Human Research Subjects: Institutional Review Board Guidebook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  18. Peters J, McAllister C, Rubinstein W (2001) Qualitative cancer genetic counseling research, Part II: Findings of an exploratory ethnographic study in a cancer clinic. J Genet Counsel 10:133–150.Google Scholar
  19. Pilarsky R, Peters J (1999) Branching out to other health professionals. Perspect Genet Counsel 21:4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • June A. Peters
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carol L. McAllister
    • 3
  • Wendy S. Rubinstein
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh; and the Cancer Genetics Program which is jointly sponsored byMagee-Womens Hospital (MWH)/The University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (UPCI)/The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health SystemPittsburgh
  2. 2.Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsNational Cancer InstitutePittsburgh
  3. 3.Departments of Medicine, and Obstetrics-Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences at the School of MedicineUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh
  4. 4.Department of Human Genetics at the Graduate School of Public HealthUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh
  5. 5.Magee-Womems HospitalUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh
  6. 6.Cancer Genetics Program, which is jointly sponsored byMWH/UPCI/UPMC (see above under author 1)Pittsburgh

Personalised recommendations