This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
Bohm, B., & Peat, F. (1987). Science, order, and creativity. New York: Bantam.
Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers. (1907). A consideration of the principles that should determine the courses in biology in the secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 7, 241–247.
Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Volume 10) (pp. 17–30). Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimere, M., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Grossman, P. L. (1989). Learning to teach without teacher education. Teachers College Record, 91, 191–208.
Hazen, R. M., & Trefil, J. (1991). Science matters. New York: Doubleday.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1983). The socialization and achievement crisis: Are cooperative learning experiences the solution? In L. Bickman (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual 4 (pp. 43–63). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 47–62.
Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1979, March). Structuring conflict in science classrooms. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, French Link, IN.
Kimball, M. E. (1965). Opinions of scientists and science teachers about science. Unpublished master's thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Kimball, M. E. (1968). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science Teachers. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 2(1), 3–6.
Klopfer, L., & Cooley, W. (1961). Test on understanding science, Form W. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.
Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teacher behavior? Science Education, 71(5), 721–734.
Millar, R. Driver, R., Leach, J., & Scott, P. (1993). Students' understanding of the nature of science: Philosophical and sociological foundations to the study. Leeds, United Kingdom: University of Leeds, Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
Rubba, P. A., & Anderson, J. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students' understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449–458.
Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Saunders, H. N. (1955). The teaching of general science in tropical secondary schools. London: Oxford University Press.
Scharmann, L. C. (1990). Enhancing and understanding of the premises of evolutionary theory: The influence of a diversified instruction strategy. School Science and Mathematics, 90(2), 91–100.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Slavin, R. (1977). Classroom reward structure: Analytical and practical review. Review of Educational Research, 47, 633–650.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L., & McCarthym, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409–421.
Vaidya, S. R. (1993). Restructuring elementary and middle school science for improved teaching and learning. Education, 144(1), 64–70.
Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). “150 different ways” of knowledge: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104–124). Eastbourne, United Kingdom: Cassell.
Yager, R. E. (1989). Ignorance and inquiry: The new raw materials of science. Science Scope, 12(6), 32–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Hammrich, P.L. Confronting Teacher Candidates' Conceptions of the Nature of Science. Journal of Science Teacher Education 8, 141–151 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009470424752
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009470424752