Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 105–115 | Cite as

The Relationship Between Family Factors and Adolescent Substance Use in Rural, Suburban, and Urban Settings

  • Scott D. Scheer
  • Lynne M. Borden
  • Joseph F. Donnermeyer


We tested the relationships and predictive power of family factors on rural, suburban, and urban adolescent substance use. A representative statewide survey of 11th grade students for gender, place of residence, and ethnicity was conducted. No significant differences were found between rural, suburban, and urban adolescents for substance use. For family sanction variables across all locations, adolescent substance involvement was significantly lower the more they perceived their families would “stop them” or “care” if they got drunk, smoked cigarettes, or used marijuana. Rural and suburban youth who reported that their parents talked to them about the dangers of smoking and getting drunk were less involved in substance use. While controlling for location, gender, and ethnicity, regression analyses showed that family sanctions against smoking cigarettes and marijuana explained a modest proportion of the variance in substance use. Finally, “family talking about the dangers of cigarettes,” “family involvement in schools” and “belief that their families cared about them” predicted lower substance use regardless of location, although minimal variance was explained. The findings have implications for social service providers regarding location settings, prevention, education, and intervention programming.

adolescents families substance use location 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bachman, J. G., Wallace, J. M., Jr., O'Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Kurth, C. L., Neighbors, H. W. (1991). Racial/ethnic differences in smoking, drinking, and illicit drug use among American high school seniors, 1976–89. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 372–377.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, G. M., & Welte, J. W. (1986). Patterns and predictors of alcohol use among 7th-12th grade students in New York State. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47, 53–62.Google Scholar
  3. Brook, J.S., Brook, D.W., Gordon, A.S., Whiteman, M., & Cohen, P. (1990). The psychosocial etiology of adolescent drug use: A family interactional approach. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 116.Google Scholar
  4. Bursik, R. J., Jr. (1986). Ecological stability and the dynamics of delinquency. In A. J. Reiss and M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime (pp. 79–103). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Coombs, R. H., & Coombs, K. (1988). Developmental stages of drug use: Changing family involvements. Journal of Chemical Dependency Treatment, 1, 73–98.Google Scholar
  6. Dembo, R., Williams, L., Wothke, W., & Schmeidler, J. (1994). The relationships among family problems, friends' troubled behavior, and high risk youths' alcohol/other drug use and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal study. The International Journal of Addictions, 29, 1419–1442.Google Scholar
  7. Donnermeyer, J. F. (1992). The use of alcohol, marijuana, and hard drugs by rural adolescents: A review of the recent research. Drugs and Society, 7, 31–75.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, R. W. (1992). Drug and alcohol use by youth in rural America: An introduction. In R. W. Edwards (Ed.), Drug use in rural American communities (pp. 1–8). New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, R. W. (1994). Alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use by youth in rural communities. In J. Blaser (Ed.), Perspectives on violence and substance use in rural America (pp. 65–86). Chicago: The Midwest Regional Center for Drug-Free Schools and Communities and the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
  10. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Farrell, A. D., Anchors, D. M., Danish, S. J., & Howard, C. W. (1992). Risk factors for drug use in rural adolescents. Journal of Drug Education, 22, 313–328.Google Scholar
  12. Freudenberg, W. R., & Jones, R. E. (1986). The density of acquaintanceship: An overlooked variable in community research. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 27–63.Google Scholar
  13. Grotevant, H. D. (1983). The contribution of the family to the facilitation of identity formation during early adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 3, 225–237.Google Scholar
  14. Grunbaum, J. A., Basen-Engquist, K., & Pandey, D. (1998). Association between violent behaviors and substance use among Mexican-American and non-Hispanic White high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 23, 153–159.Google Scholar
  15. Hawkins, J.D., Catalano, R.F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.Google Scholar
  16. Holmbeck, G. N., & Hill, J. P. (1988). Storm and stress beliefs about adolescence: Prevalence, self-reported antecedents, and effects of an undergraduate course. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 285–306.Google Scholar
  17. Hundleby, J., & Mercer, G. (1987). Family and friends as social environment and their relationship to young adolescents' use of alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 125–134.Google Scholar
  18. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, R. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1992). Smoking, drinking, and illicit drug use among American secondary school students, college students, and young adults. 1975–1991. (NIH Publication No. 93–3481). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  19. Kaufman, E., & Kaufman, P. (1979). Family therapy of alcohol abuse. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kowalski, G. S., & Duffield, D. (1990). The impact of the rural population component on homicide rates in the United States: A county-level analysis. Rural Sociology, 55, 76–90.Google Scholar
  21. Norem-Hebeisen, A., Johnson, D. W., Anderson, D., & Johnson, R. (1984). Predictors and concomitants of changes in drug use patterns among teenagers. Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 43–50.Google Scholar
  22. Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1987). Peer cluster theory, socialization characteristics, and adolescent drug use: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 205–213.Google Scholar
  23. Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1990). Orthogonal cultural identification theory: The cultural identification of minority adolescents. The International Journal of Addictions, 25, 655–685.Google Scholar
  24. Sampson, R. J. (1985). Neighborhood and crime: The structural determinants of personal victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 7–40.Google Scholar
  25. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.Google Scholar
  26. Scheer, S. D., & Unger, D. G. (1998). Russian adolescents in the era of emergent democracy: The relationships among family environment, drug use, and depression. Family Relations, 47, 297–303.Google Scholar
  27. Scheer, S. D., Unger, D. G., & Brown, M. H. (1996). Adolescents becoming adults: Attributes for adulthood. Adolescence, 31, 127–132.Google Scholar
  28. Spoth, R., Yoo, S., Kahn, J. H., & Redmond, C. (1996). A model of the effects of protective parent and peer factors on young adolescent alcohol refusal skills. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 16, 373–394.Google Scholar
  29. Swaim, R. C., Bates, S. C., & Chavez, E. L. (1998). Structural equation socialization model of substance use among Mexican-American and White non-Hispanic school dropouts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 23, 128–138.Google Scholar
  30. Wills, T. A., Vaccaro, D., & McNamara, G. (1992). The role of life events, family support, and competence in adolescent substance use: A test of vulnerability and protective factors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 349–374.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott D. Scheer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lynne M. Borden
    • 3
  • Joseph F. Donnermeyer
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Human and Community Resource Development and OSU ExtensionThe Ohio State UniversityColumbus
  2. 2.The Department of Human and Community Resource Development and OSU ExtensionThe Ohio State UniversityColumbus
  3. 3.Youth and Family ProgramsMichigan State University ExtensionEast Lansing
  4. 4.Department of Human and Community Resource DevelopmentThe Ohio State UniversityColumbus

Personalised recommendations