Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 75–86 | Cite as

Young Offenders with Disabilities: Legal Requirements and Reform Considerations

  • Antonis Katsiyannis
  • Francie Murry
Article

Abstract

Delinquency rates have been a persistent concern in the United States with juveniles involved in almost a third of arrests for major crimes in 1993. Further, a disproportionate number of youths incarcerated have a disability. Because youths with disabilities in correctional facilities present legal and educational challenges, we explored the parameters of providing appropriate services based on individual needs. Despite applicable federal legislation, the juvenile correctional system often fails to meet the educational needs of those with disabilities (i.e., some youths are denied special education services, services are often inferior to those provided by public schools, and teachers are often inadequately trained). According to federal legislation, juvenile facilities must observe procedural safeguards afforded to those individuals and provide needed services even for pre trial detainees (services, however, may be balanced against legitimate security concerns). Ultimately, state educational agencies have the responsibility for ensuring that youths with disabilities receive a free appropriate education. Promising practices applicable to all youths may include Positive Peer Culture, aggression replacement training, aftercare programs, and research validated instructional interventions.

delinquency special education legislation litigation educational practice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. A.C.v. McDonnel (1995). Class action 95-uv-1838, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander S. v. Boyd, 22 IDELR 139 (D.S.C. 1995).Google Scholar
  3. Ashland School District v. New Hampshire Division for Children, Youth, and Families, 24 IDELR 165 (N.H. 1996).Google Scholar
  4. Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the national longitudinal transition study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–414.Google Scholar
  5. Bohac, P., Evans, B., & Ritchie, B. (1996). Juvenile justice and the Florida legislature: Lessons, problems, and a possible template. Preventing School Failure, 40(2), 53–55.Google Scholar
  6. Brier, N. (1995). Predicting antisocial behavior in youngsters displaying poor academic achievement: A review of risk factors. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 16, 271–276.Google Scholar
  7. Briscoe, R. V., & Doyle, J. P. (1996). Aftercare services in juvenile justice: Approaches for providing services for high-risk youth. Preventing School Failure, 40, 73–76.Google Scholar
  8. California Department of Youth Authority, EHLR 352:307 (OCR 1986).Google Scholar
  9. Colorado Division of Youth Corrections (July, 1998). Critical incident report. Denver, CO: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  10. Del Norte County (CA) Office of Education, 20 IDELR 1070 (OCR, 1993).Google Scholar
  11. Doe by Brockhuis v. Arizona Department of Education, 25 IDELR 824 (9th Cir. 1997).Google Scholar
  12. Donnell C. v. Illinois State Board of Education, 20 IDELR 514 (N.D. Ill. 1993).Google Scholar
  13. Donlevy, J.G., & Weissman, G. (1992). Integrating positive peer culture into the residential treatment center and public school curriculum: Suggestions for practice. Journal of Correctional Education, 43, 166–170.Google Scholar
  14. Doren, B., Bullis, M., & Benz, M.R. (1996). Predicting the arrest status of adolescents with disabilities in transition. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 363–380.Google Scholar
  15. Foldesi, T., & Soyring, M. (1993). Antisocial, chemically dependent youth in a peer culture group setting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Problems, 2, 22–24, 26.Google Scholar
  16. Gable, R.A., Allen, N.L., & Hendrickson, J.M. (1995). Use of peer confrontation to modify disruptive behavior in inclusion classrooms. Preventing School Failure, 40, 25–28.Google Scholar
  17. Goldstein, A.P., Glick, B., & Gibbs, J.C. (1998). Aggression replacement training. Champaign, Ill: Research Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gottfredson, D.C. (1997). School-based crime prevention. In L. Sherman, D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter, & S. Bushway (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising (pp. 5–1–5–74).College Park, MD: Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
  19. Grande, C.G., & Oseroff, A. (1991). Special education planning in jails? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 16, 103–111.Google Scholar
  20. Human Rights Watch (1997). High country lockup: Children in confinement in Colorado. New York: Human Rights Watch Children's Rights Project.Google Scholar
  21. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Public Law 105–17, 20 U.S.C. Chapter 33, Section 1414 et seq. (EDLAW, 1997).Google Scholar
  22. Irvine (CA) Unified School District, EHLR 352:327 (OCR 1986).Google Scholar
  23. Jones, V. F., & Jones, L. (1997). Comprehensive classroom management: Creating communities of support and solving problems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  24. Katsiyannis, A., & Archwamety, T. (1999). Academic remediation/achievement and other factors related to recidivism rates among delinquent youths. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 93–101.Google Scholar
  25. King v. Pine Plains Central School District, 24 IDELR 50 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).Google Scholar
  26. Koyangi, C., & Gaines, S. (1993). All systems failure: An examination of the results of neglecting the needs of children with serious emotional disturbance. Washington, DC: National Mental Health Association.Google Scholar
  27. Leone, P.E. (1986). Teacher training in corrections and special education. Remedial and Special Education, 7(3), 41–47.Google Scholar
  28. Leone, P.E. (1994). Education services for youth with disabilities in state-operated juvenile correctional system: Case study and analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 43–58.Google Scholar
  29. Leone, P.E., Rutherford, R., & Nelson, C. (1991). Special education in juvenile corrections. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
  30. Lewis, K.A., Schwartz, G.M., & Ianacone, R.N. (1988). Service coordination between correctional and public school systems for handicapped juvenile offenders. Exceptional Children, 55, 66–70.Google Scholar
  31. MacMillan, D.L., Gresham, F.M., Lopez, M., & Bocian, K.M. (1996). Comparison of students nominated for prereferral interventions by ethnicity and gender. Journal of Special Education, 30, 133–151.Google Scholar
  32. Maguire, K., & Pastore, A.L. (1995). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics (1994). U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC: U.S. Printing Office.Google Scholar
  33. Malian, I.M., & Love, L.L. (1998). Leaving high school: An ongoing transition study. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(3), 4–10.Google Scholar
  34. McGinnis, E., & Goldstein, A.P. (1984). Skill streaming the elementary school child. Champaign, Ill: Research Press.Google Scholar
  35. McIntyre, T. (1993). Behaviorally disordered youth in correctional settings: Prevalence, programming and teacher training. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 167–76.Google Scholar
  36. Morgan v. Chris L. by Mike L., 25 IDELR 227 (6th Cir. 1997).Google Scholar
  37. New Hampshire Department of Education v. City of Manchester, NH School District, 23 IDELR 1057 (D.N.H. 1996).Google Scholar
  38. OCR. (1997). Letter to Copenhaver, 26 IDELR 397.Google Scholar
  39. OSEP. (1987). Letter to Perryman, EHLR 211:438.Google Scholar
  40. OSEP. (1988). Letter to Weintraub, EHLR 213:197.Google Scholar
  41. OSEP. (1995). Letter to Hayden, 24 IDELR 387.Google Scholar
  42. Paul Y. by Kathy Y. v. Singletary, 27 IDELR 1 (S.D. Fla. 1997).Google Scholar
  43. O'Donnell, J., Hawkins, J.D., & Abbott, R.D. (1995). Predicting serious delinquency and substance use among aggressive boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 437–529.Google Scholar
  44. Pollard, R.R., Pollard, C.J., & Meers, G.D. (1995). A sociological, psychological and educational profile of adjudicated youth with disabilities. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 17(2), 56–61.Google Scholar
  45. Rodiriecus L. by Betty H. v. Waukegan School District No. 60, 25 IDELR 119 (N.D. Ill. 1996).Google Scholar
  46. State of Connecticut-Unified School District No. 1 v. State Department of Education, 27 IDELR 3 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1997).Google Scholar
  47. State of Wisconsin v. Trent N., 26 IDELR 434 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997).Google Scholar
  48. Tannehill, R. L. (1987). Employing a modified positive peer culture treatment approach in a state youth center. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, & Rehabilitation, 12(1), 113–129.Google Scholar
  49. Traynelis-Yurek, E.T., & Giacobbe, G.A. (1989). Unremediated learning disabilities and reincarceration. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, & Rehabilitation, 13, 163–174.Google Scholar
  50. Tremblay, R.E., Masse, B., Perron, D., Leblanc, M., Schwartzman, A.E., & Ledingham, J. E. (1992).Early disruptive behavior, poor school achievement, delinquent behavior, and delinquent personality longitudinal analyses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 64–72.Google Scholar
  51. U.S. Department of Education. (1994). Mini-Digest of Education Statistics, 1994. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  52. U.S. Department of Education. (1996). Dropout rates in the United States: 1994. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  53. Virginia Department of Education, EHLR 353: 264 (OCR 1989).Google Scholar
  54. Vorrath, H., & Brendtro, L. (1974). Positive peer culture. Chicago: Adline.Google Scholar
  55. Zelin, G. M. (1993). Special education and the juvenile justice system. New Hampshire Bar Journal, 34, 21–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonis Katsiyannis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francie Murry
    • 3
  1. 1.Special EducationClemson UniversityClemson
  2. 2.Special EducationClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  3. 3.Special EducationUniversity of Northern ColoradoGreeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations