Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 151–168 | Cite as

Qualitative Cancer Genetic Counseling Research, Part II: Findings from a Exploratory Ethnographic Study in a Cancer Clinic

  • June A. Peters
  • Carol L. McAllister
  • Wendy S. Rubinstein

Abstract

This is a report of the preliminary findings of a brief exploratory ethnographic study in a cancer diagnosis and treatment clinic. The main research purpose was to explore the meaning of cancer and cancer treatment to patients themselves and to their relatives and close friends. The methods are described in detail in a paper focusing on the experiences of being a novice ethnographer (Peters et al. (2001) J Genet Counsel 10(2):133–150.). The preliminary results of this exploratory fieldwork indicate that the experience of attending a cancer treatment clinic for evaluation and/or treatment is a complex social, emotional as well as medical process for patients and families. Themes with relevance to genetic counselors that emerged from this early observation period included ideas about causes of cancer, the complex nature of families and kinship, coping and support, use of food, and healing. These initial findings have implications for genetic counseling practice and hopefully will stimulate more qualitative social and behavioral research in cancer genetic counseling.

hereditary cancer genetic counseling qualitative behavioral psychosocial research ethnography anthropology participant-observation family 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ad Hoc Committee of the American Society of Human Genetics (1975) Genetic counseling definition. Am J Human Genet 27:240–242.Google Scholar
  2. Baker D, Shuette J, Uhlmann W (2000) Genetic Counseling. New York, NY: Wiley Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett RL (1999) The Practical Guide to the Genetic Family History. New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
  4. Bolen JS (1996) Close to the Bone. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  5. Daly M, Farmer J, Harrop-Stein C, Montgomery S, Itzen M, Costalas JW, Rogatko A, Miller S, Balshem A, Gillespie D (1999) Exploring family relationships in cancer risk counseling using the genogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:393–398.Google Scholar
  6. Eunpu DL (1997) Systematically-based psychotherapeutic techniques in genetic counseling. J Genet Counsel 6:1–20.Google Scholar
  7. Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B (1997) Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practic. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Hahn RA (1995) Sickness and Healing: An Anthropological Perspective. Google Scholar
  9. Hammersley M, Atkinson P (1995) Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Jordan J, Kaplan A, Miller JB, Stiver IP, Surrey J (1991) Women's Growth in Connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. Kayser K, Sormanti M, Strainchamps E (1999) Women coping with cancer: The influence of relationship factors in psychosocial adjustment. Psychol Women Q 23:725–739.Google Scholar
  12. Kenen R (1996) The at-risk health status and technology: A diagnostic invitation and the “gift” of knowing. Soc Sci Med 42:1545–1553.Google Scholar
  13. Kenen R, Peters JA (submitted) The colored, eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM):Atool for genetic cancer risk counseling research. J Genet Counsel.Google Scholar
  14. Kessler S (1990) Current psychological issues in genetic counseling. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 11:5–18.Google Scholar
  15. Lerman C, Schwartz MD, Miller SM, et al. (1996) A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: Interaction effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style. Health Psychol 15:75–83.Google Scholar
  16. McAllister C (1990) Women and feasting: Ritual exchange, capitalism, and islamic revival in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Res Econ Anthropol 12:23–51.Google Scholar
  17. McGoldrick M, Gerson R, Shellenberger S (1999) Genograms: Assessment and Intervention. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Michie S, Marteau T (1996) Genetic counseling: Some issues of theory and practice. In: Marteau T, Richards M (eds) The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, pp 104–122.Google Scholar
  19. Miller JB, Stiver IP (1997) The Healing Connection. Boston MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  20. NSGC (1992) National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) Code of Ethics. J Genet Counsel 1:41–44.Google Scholar
  21. Palmer S, Spencer J, Kushnick T, Wiley J, Bowyer S (1993) Follow-up survey of pregnancies with diagnoses of chromosomal abnormality. J Genet Counsel 2:139–152.Google Scholar
  22. Peters J, McAllister C, Rubinstein W (2001) Qualitative cancer genetic counseling research, Part I: Ethnography in a cancer clinic. J Genet Counsel 10(2):151–168.Google Scholar
  23. Resta R (2000) The crane's foot: The rise of the pedigree in human genetics. J Genet Counsel 2:235–260.Google Scholar
  24. Rolland JS (1989) Chronic illness and the family life cycle. In: Carter B, McGoldrick M (eds) The Changing Family Life Cycle: A Framework for Family Therapy, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp 433–456.Google Scholar
  25. Rolland JS (1994) Families, Illness, and Disability: An Integrative Treatment Model. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Schweitzer A (1947) On the edge of the primeval forest. In: Joy C (ed) Albert Schweitzer: An Anthology Boston: Beacon Press, pp 287, 288.Google Scholar
  27. Shiloh S, Saxe L (2000) Perception of risk in genetic counseling. Psychol and Health 3:45–61.Google Scholar
  28. Webster (1994) Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Grammercy Book.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • June A. Peters
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carol L. McAllister
    • 3
  • Wendy S. Rubinstein
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public HealthUniversity of Pittsburgh; and the Cancer Genetics Program which is jointly sponsored by Magee-Womens Hospital (MWH)/The University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (UPCI)/The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health SystemPittsburgh
  2. 2.Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RockvilleMaryland
  3. 3.Department of Human Services Administration, Graduate School of Public Health, and Anthropology DepartmentUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh
  4. 4.Departments of Medicine, and Obstetrics-Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences at the School of MedicineUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh
  5. 5.Department of Human Genetics at the Graduate School of Public HealthUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh
  6. 6.Cancer Genetics Program, which is jointly sponsored by MWH/UPCI/UPMC (see above under author 1)Pittsburgh

Personalised recommendations