Skip to main content

National biodiversity risk assessment: a composite multivariate and index approach

Abstract

Due to the shortage of financial resources for international conservation assistance, the setting of priorities for this assistance is an important issue. A national biodiversity risk assessment index (NABRAI) is constructed to quantify national conservation performances and identify nation states of critical conservation concern. The index, which contains measures of biodiversity stock, flow and response measures, attempts to overcome several weaknesses present in other models used to prioritize nations for conservation assistance. Multivariate analyses of the index as well as economic and biodiversity resources reveal significant positive correlations between the NABRAI values and population density as well as land area exposed to high disturbance intensity. The combination of the multivariate analyses and the interpretation of NABRAI values allows for prioritization of biodiversity risk among the global community and can thus serve as an indicator of current priorities for policy makers. The present study also suggests two methods to incorporate a better understanding of biodiversity risk in models of conservation priorities; by including a wider range of variables and by developing a theoretical foundation for the relationship between the categories of variables used in the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C.S., Jannson, B., Levin, S., Maler, K., Perrings, C. and Pimental, D. (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity and the environment. Ecol. Appl. 6, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein, E. and Wikramanayake, E. (1993) Beyond Hotspots: How to prioritize investments to conserve biodiversity in the Indo-Pacific region. Conserv. Biol. 7(1), 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICBP (1992) Putting Biodiversity on the Map. Priority Areas for Global Conservation. Cambridge, UK: International Council for Bird Preservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (1996) International Financial Statisticcs. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A.N., Green, M.J.B. and Paine, J.R. (in press) Financial Indicators for Biological Diversity Conservation: A Global Analysis of Protected Area Investment. Cambridge, UK: World Conservation Monitoring Centre.

  • Lake, R. (1996) New and Additional?: Financial Resources for Biodiversity Conservation in Developing Countries 1987–1994. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J.A. (1996) Assessing Methods for Setting Conservation Priorities. Paper presented at OECD International Conference on Incentive Measures for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use, Cairns, Australia, 25–28 March 1996.

  • Mittermeier, R.A. (1988) Primate diversity and the tropical forest: case studies from Brazil and Madagascar and the importance of megadiversity countries. In Biodiversity (E.O. Wilson, ed.). Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1988) Threatened biotas: hotspots in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8(3), 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1990) The biodiversity challenge: expanded hotspots analysis. Environmentalist 10(4), 243–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1995) External Debt Statistics. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primer (1994) Plymouth Marine Laboratories. Plymouth: NERC, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, T.D., Launer, A.E., Switky, K.R. and Ehrlich P.R. (1994) Identifying extinction threats. BioScience 44(9), 592–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork, N.E. and Samways, M.J. (1995) Inventorying and monitoring of biodiversity. In Global Biodiversity Assessment (V.H. Heywood, ed.) pp. 453–544. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (1994) Human Development Report 1994. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1995) Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1996) The Availability of Financial Resources. Note by the Executive Secretary for the Third Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 4–19, 1996 (Document UNEP/CBD/COP/3/37). Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Jaarsveld, A.S. (1996) Towards a co-evolutionary framework for implementing sustainable development. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 3, 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCMC (1994a) Development of a National Biodiversity Index. A WCMC Discussion Paper (Mimeo).

  • WCMC (1994b) Biodiversity Data Sourcebook. WCMC Biodiversity Series No. 1. Cambridge, UK: World Conservation Monitoring Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI (1994) World Resources 1994–1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI, IUCN and UNEP (1992) Global Biodiversity Strategy. Washington, DC: WRI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reyers, B., Jaarsveld, A.S.V., McGEOCH, M.A. et al. National biodiversity risk assessment: a composite multivariate and index approach. Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 945–965 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008881405539

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008881405539

  • biodiversity
  • risk assessment
  • national
  • index
  • multivariate