Abstract
Due to the shortage of financial resources for international conservation assistance, the setting of priorities for this assistance is an important issue. A national biodiversity risk assessment index (NABRAI) is constructed to quantify national conservation performances and identify nation states of critical conservation concern. The index, which contains measures of biodiversity stock, flow and response measures, attempts to overcome several weaknesses present in other models used to prioritize nations for conservation assistance. Multivariate analyses of the index as well as economic and biodiversity resources reveal significant positive correlations between the NABRAI values and population density as well as land area exposed to high disturbance intensity. The combination of the multivariate analyses and the interpretation of NABRAI values allows for prioritization of biodiversity risk among the global community and can thus serve as an indicator of current priorities for policy makers. The present study also suggests two methods to incorporate a better understanding of biodiversity risk in models of conservation priorities; by including a wider range of variables and by developing a theoretical foundation for the relationship between the categories of variables used in the model.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C.S., Jannson, B., Levin, S., Maler, K., Perrings, C. and Pimental, D. (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity and the environment. Ecol. Appl. 6, 13–16.
Dinerstein, E. and Wikramanayake, E. (1993) Beyond Hotspots: How to prioritize investments to conserve biodiversity in the Indo-Pacific region. Conserv. Biol. 7(1), 53–65.
ICBP (1992) Putting Biodiversity on the Map. Priority Areas for Global Conservation. Cambridge, UK: International Council for Bird Preservation.
IMF (1996) International Financial Statisticcs. Washington, DC: IMF.
James, A.N., Green, M.J.B. and Paine, J.R. (in press) Financial Indicators for Biological Diversity Conservation: A Global Analysis of Protected Area Investment. Cambridge, UK: World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
Lake, R. (1996) New and Additional?: Financial Resources for Biodiversity Conservation in Developing Countries 1987–1994. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.
McNeely, J.A. (1996) Assessing Methods for Setting Conservation Priorities. Paper presented at OECD International Conference on Incentive Measures for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use, Cairns, Australia, 25–28 March 1996.
Mittermeier, R.A. (1988) Primate diversity and the tropical forest: case studies from Brazil and Madagascar and the importance of megadiversity countries. In Biodiversity (E.O. Wilson, ed.). Washington: National Academy Press.
Myers, N. (1988) Threatened biotas: hotspots in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8(3), 187–208.
Myers, N. (1990) The biodiversity challenge: expanded hotspots analysis. Environmentalist 10(4), 243–56.
OECD (1995) External Debt Statistics. Paris: OECD.
Primer (1994) Plymouth Marine Laboratories. Plymouth: NERC, UK.
Sisk, T.D., Launer, A.E., Switky, K.R. and Ehrlich P.R. (1994) Identifying extinction threats. BioScience 44(9), 592–604.
Stork, N.E. and Samways, M.J. (1995) Inventorying and monitoring of biodiversity. In Global Biodiversity Assessment (V.H. Heywood, ed.) pp. 453–544. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
UNDP (1994) Human Development Report 1994. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UNEP (1995) Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
UNEP (1996) The Availability of Financial Resources. Note by the Executive Secretary for the Third Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 4–19, 1996 (Document UNEP/CBD/COP/3/37). Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
Van Jaarsveld, A.S. (1996) Towards a co-evolutionary framework for implementing sustainable development. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 3, 15–37.
WCMC (1994a) Development of a National Biodiversity Index. A WCMC Discussion Paper (Mimeo).
WCMC (1994b) Biodiversity Data Sourcebook. WCMC Biodiversity Series No. 1. Cambridge, UK: World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
WRI (1994) World Resources 1994–1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WRI, IUCN and UNEP (1992) Global Biodiversity Strategy. Washington, DC: WRI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reyers, B., Jaarsveld, A.S.V., McGEOCH, M.A. et al. National biodiversity risk assessment: a composite multivariate and index approach. Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 945–965 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008881405539
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008881405539
- biodiversity
- risk assessment
- national
- index
- multivariate