Advertisement

Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 507–529 | Cite as

The Effects of Media and Task on User Performance: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis

  • Brian E. Mennecke
  • Joseph S. Valacich
  • Bradley C. Wheeler
Article

Abstract

This research was designed to examine the task-media fit hypothesis, an extension to media richness theory that predicts the objective performance of various media for a number of task types. To examine this model, dyads communicating through face-to-face, videophone, telephone (i.e., audio-only communication), or synchronous computer-mediated communication worked in a laboratory experiment to address an intellective or negotiation task. The intellective task required that each dyad member effectively share factual information that each individual independently held. The negotiation task required that each dyad member effectively share preferences based on personal values and reach an agreement. The results of the study provide mixed support for the task-media fit hypothesis. In general, the results for the negotiation task largely supported the theory while the results for the intellective task did not support the theory. These results help to clarify limitations and provide extensions to the theory by demonstrating how variations in task processes and communication media act to mediate task performance. The implications of these results for future research and practice are discussed.

data and information sharing dyads experimental research group decision making media richness theory media selection task manipulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alavi, M., B. C. Wheeler, and J. S. Valacich. (1995). "Using IT to Reengineer Business Education: An Exploratory Investigation of Collaborative Telelearning," Management Information Systems Quarterly 19(3), 293–312.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, D.G., and R. W. Griffeth. (1997). "Vertical and Lateral Information Processing: The Effects of Gender, Employee Classification Level, and Media Richness on Communication and Work Outcomes," Human Relations 50(10), 1239–1260.Google Scholar
  3. Benbasat, I., and L. H. Lim. (1993). "The Effects of Group, Task, Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems: A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies," Small Group Research 24(4), 430–462.Google Scholar
  4. Burgeon, J. K., and J. L. Hale. (1987). "Validation and Measurement of the Fundamental Themes of Relational Communication," Communication Monographs 54, 19–41.Google Scholar
  5. Carley, K. (1986). "Knowledge Acquisition as a Social Phenomenon," Instructional Science 14, 381–438.Google Scholar
  6. Chapanis, A., R. B. Ochsman, R. N. Parrish, and G. D. Weeks. (1972). "Studies in Interactive Communication: I. The Effects of Four Communication Modes on the Behavior of Teams During Cooperative Problem-Solving," Human Factors 14(6), 487–509.Google Scholar
  7. Chidambaram, L. (1996). "Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups," MIS Quarterly 20(2), 143–165.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, E. W., and J. R. Bailey. (1997). "A Source Accessibility Effect on Media Selection," Management Communication Quarterly 10(3), 373–387.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, T. D., and D. T. Campbell. (1975). Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  10. Daft, R.L., and R. H. Lengel. (1984). "Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Information Processing and Organizational Design," in B. Straw and L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 199–233.Google Scholar
  11. Daft, R. L., and R. H. Lengel. (1986). "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science 32(5), 554–571.Google Scholar
  12. Daft, R. L., R. H. Lengel, and L. K. Trevino. (1987). "Message Equivocality, Media Selection and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems," MIS Quarterly 11, 355–366.Google Scholar
  13. Dennis, A. R., and J. S. Valacich. (1993). "Computer Brainstorms: More Heads are Better Than One," Journal of Applied Psychology 78(4), 531–537.Google Scholar
  14. DeStephen, R. S., and R. Y. Hirokawa. (1988). "Small Group Consensus: Stability of Group Support of the Decision, Task Process, and Group Relations," Small Group Behavior 19(2), 227–239.Google Scholar
  15. Donabedian, B., S. M. McKinnon, and W. J. Bruns. (1998). "Task Characteristics, Managerial Socialization, and Media Selection," Management Communication Quarterly, 11(3), 372–400.Google Scholar
  16. Duncanson, J. P., and A. D. Williams. (1973). "Video Conferencing: Reactions of Users," Human Factors 15(5), 471–485.Google Scholar
  17. El-Shinnawy, M. M., and M. L. Markus. (1992). "Media Richness Theory and New Communication Media: A Study of Voice Mail and Electronic Mail," Proceedings of Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, 91-105.Google Scholar
  18. Kydd, C. T., and D. L. Ferry. (1994). "Managerial use of Video Conferencing," Information and Management 27, 369–375.Google Scholar
  19. Fish, R., R. Kraut, R. Root, and R. E. Rice. (1993). "Video as a Technology for Informal Communication," Communications of the ACM 36(1), 48–61.Google Scholar
  20. Fowler, G., and M. Wackerbarth. (1980). "Audio Teleconferencing versus Face-To-Face Conferencing: A Synthesis of the Literature," Western Journal of Speech Communication 44, 236–252.Google Scholar
  21. Fulk, J., and B. Boyd. (1991). "Emerging Theories of Communications in Organizations," Journal of Management 17(2), 407–446.Google Scholar
  22. Gallupe, R. B., A. R. Dennis, W. H. Cooper, J. S. Valacich, J. F. Nunamaker Jr., and L. Bastianutti. (1992). "Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size," Academy of Management Journal 35(2), 350–369.Google Scholar
  23. Gordon, M. E., L. A. Slade, and N. Schmidtt. (1986). "The 'Science of the Sophomore' Revisited: From Conjecture to Empiricism," Academy of Management Review 11(1), 191–207.Google Scholar
  24. Gouran, D. S., and S. C. Geonetta. (1977). "Patterns of Interaction in Discussion Groups at Varying Distances from Consensus," Small Group Behavior 8, 517–523.Google Scholar
  25. Green, S., and T. Taber. (1980). "The Effects of Three Social Decision Schemes on Decision Group Process," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 25, 97–106.Google Scholar
  26. Hollingshead, A. B., J. E. McGrath, and K. M. O'Connor. (1993). "Group Task Performance and Communication Technology: A Longitudinal Study of Computer-Mediated Versus Face-To-Face Work Groups," Small Group Research 24(3), 307–333.Google Scholar
  27. Johansen, R., J. Vallee, and K. Spangler. (1979). Electronic Meetings: Technological Alternatives and Social Choices. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kettinger, W. J., and V. Grover. (1997). "The Use of Computer-Mediated Communication in an Interorganizational Context," Decision Sciences 28(3), 513–555.Google Scholar
  29. King, R. C., A. Hartman, and K. Hartzel. (1992). "Message Creation Versatility, Media Capacity, and Media Choice: A Forward Looking Perspective." Proceedings of Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, 1992, 257.Google Scholar
  30. King, R. C., and W. Xia. (1997). "Media Appropriateness: Effects of Experience on Communication Media Choice," Decision Sciences 28(4), 877–910.Google Scholar
  31. Kinney, S. T., and A. R. Dennis. (1994). "Reevaluating Media Richness: Cues, Feedback, and Task." Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science 4, 21–30.Google Scholar
  32. Kinney, S. T., and R. T. Watson. (1992). "The Effect of Medium and Task on Dyadic Communication." Proceedings of Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, 107-117.Google Scholar
  33. Kline, J. A., and J. L. Hollinger. (1976). "Redundancy, Self-Orientation, and Group Consensus," Speech Monographs 40, 72–74.Google Scholar
  34. Klockars, A. J., and G. Sax. (1986). Multiple Comparisons. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, A. S. (1994). "Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation," MIS Quarterly 18(2), 143–157.Google Scholar
  36. Lengel, R., and R. Daft. (1988). "The Selection of Communication Media as an Executive Skill," Academy of Management Executive 2, 225–232.Google Scholar
  37. Lindman, H. R. (1992). Analysis of Variance in Experimental Design. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  38. Markus, M. L. (1987). "Toward a 'Critical Mass' Theory of Interactive Media," Communication Research 14, 491–511.Google Scholar
  39. Markus, M. L. (1994). "Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice," Organization Science 5(4), 502–527.Google Scholar
  40. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  41. McGrath, J. E. (1991). "Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups," Small Group Research 22(2), 147–174.Google Scholar
  42. McGrath, J. E. (1993). "Time, Task, and Technology in Work Groups: The JEMCO Workshop Study," Small Group Research 24(3), 283–421.Google Scholar
  43. McGrath, J. E., and A. B. Hollingshead. (1993). "Putting the 'Group' Back in Group Support Systems: Some Theoretical Issues About Dynamic Processes in Groups With Technological Enhancements," in L. M. Jessup and J. S. Valacich (eds.), Group Support Systems: New Perspectives. New York: Macmillan, pp. 78–96.Google Scholar
  44. McLeod, P. L. (1992). "An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support Of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis," Human-Computer Interaction 7, 257–280.Google Scholar
  45. Mennecke, B. E., and B. C. Wheeler. (1993). "Tasks Matter: Modeling Group Task Processes in Experimental CSCW Research." Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science 4, Wailea, HA, 71-80.Google Scholar
  46. Ngwenyama, O. K., and A. S. Lee. (1997). "Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning," MIS Quarterly 21(2), 145–167.Google Scholar
  47. Ochsman, R., and A. Chapanis. (1974). "The Effects Of 10 Communication Modes on the Behavior of Teams during Co-Operative Problem-Solving," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 6, 579–619.Google Scholar
  48. Panko, R. (1992). "Managerial Communication Patterns," Journal of Organizational Computing 2(1), 95–122.Google Scholar
  49. Reder, S., and N. F. Conklin. (1987). "Selection and Effects of Channels in Distributed Communication and Decision-Making Tasks: A Theoretical Review and a Proposed Research Paradigm." Presented at the 37th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada, 1987.Google Scholar
  50. Rice, R. (1984). The New Media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Rice, R. E. (1992). "Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness," Organization Science 3(4), 475–500.Google Scholar
  52. Rice, R. E. (1993). "Media Appropriateness: Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media," Human Communication Research 20(2).Google Scholar
  53. Rice, R. E., A. Grant, J. Schmitz, and J. Torobin. (1990). "Individual and Network Influences on the Adoption and Perceived Outcomes of Electronic Messaging," Social Networks 12(1), 27–55.Google Scholar
  54. Rice, R. E., and D. Shook. (1990). "Relationships of Job Categories and Organizational Levels to Use of Communication Channels, Including Electronic Mail: A Meta-Analysis and Extension," Journal of Management Studies 27(3), 195–229.Google Scholar
  55. Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication Technology: The New Media in Society. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rubin, J., and B. Brown. (1975). The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  57. Saunders, C., and J. W. Jones. (1990). "Temporal Sequences in Information Acquisition for Decision Making: A Focus on Source and Medium," Academy of Management Review 15(1), 29–46.Google Scholar
  58. Short, J., E. Williams, and B. Christie. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Sitkin, S. B., K. M. Sutcliffe, and J. R. Barrios-Choplin. (1992). "A Dual-Capacity Model of Communication Media Choice in Organizations," Human Communication Research 18(4), 563–598.Google Scholar
  60. Trevino, L. K., R. H. Lengel, and R. L. Daft. (1987). "Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations," Communication Research 14(5), 553–574.Google Scholar
  61. Trevino, L. K., R. H. Lengel, W. Bodensteiner, E. Gerloff, and N. K. Muir. (1990). "The Richness Imperative and Cognitive Style: The Role of Individual Differences in Media Choice Behavior," Management Communication Quarterly 4, 176–197.Google Scholar
  62. Valacich, J. S., A. R. Dennis, and T. Connolly. (1994). "Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending To an Old Story," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 57, 448–467.Google Scholar
  63. Valacich, J. S., D. Paranka, J. F. George, and J. F. Nunamaker Jr. (1993). "Communication Concurrency and the New Media: A New Dimension for Media Richness," Communication Research 20(2), 249–276.Google Scholar
  64. Walther, J. B. (1992). "Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective," Communication Research 19(1), 52–90.Google Scholar
  65. Walther, J. B. (1995). "Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations Over Time," Organization Science 6(2), 186–203.Google Scholar
  66. Walther, J. B. (1997). "Groups and Interpersonal Effects in International Computer-Mediated Collaboration," Human Communication Research 23(3), 342–369.Google Scholar
  67. Walther, J. B., and J. K. Burgoon. (1992). "Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction," Human Communication Research 19(1), 50–88.Google Scholar
  68. Webster, J., and P. Hackley. (1997). "Teaching Effectiveness in Technology-Mediated Distance Learning," Academy of Management Journal 40(6), 1282–1309.Google Scholar
  69. Williams, E. (1975). "Medium or Message: Communications Medium as a Determinant of Interpersonal Evaluation," Sociometry 38(1), 119–130.Google Scholar
  70. Williams, E. (1977). "Experimental Comparisons of Face-To-Face and Mediated Communication: A Review," Psychological Bulletin 84(5), 963–976.Google Scholar
  71. Wood, R. E., (1986). "Task Complexity: Definition of the Construct," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, 60–82.Google Scholar
  72. Zack, M. H. (1993). "Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups," Information Systems Research 4(3), 207–239.Google Scholar
  73. Zmud, R. W., M. R. Lind, and F. W. Young. (1990). "An Attribute Space for Organizational Communication Channels," Information Systems Research 1(4), 440–457.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian E. Mennecke
    • 1
  • Joseph S. Valacich
    • 2
  • Bradley C. Wheeler
    • 3
  1. 1.College of BusinessIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Washington State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Indiana UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations