Abstract
This paper deals with the so-called ‘double dividend’ of an environmental tax reform. In a model with only labor and a polluting input as factors of production, we find that society faces a trade-off between internalizing environmental externalities and raising revenues in the least distortionary way. However, if capital enters the production structure, an ecological tax reform may render the tax structure more efficient from a non-environmental point of view, thereby raising not only environmental quality but also private incomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berndt, E. R., and D. O. Wood. (1979). “Engineering and Econometric Interpretations of Energy−Capital Complementarity.” American Economic Review 69, 342–354.
Berndt, E. R., and D. M. Hesse. (1986). “Measuring and Assessing Capacity Utilization in the Manufacturing Sectors of Nine OECD Countries.” European Economic Review 30, 961–989.
Bovenberg, A. L., and R. A. De Mooij. (1994a). “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation.” American Economic Review 84, 1085–1089.
Bovenberg, A. L., and R. A. De Mooij. (1994b). “Environmental Taxes and Labor−Market Distortions.” European Journal of Political Economy 10, 655–683.
Bovenberg, A. L., and F. van der Ploeg. (1994a). “Environmental Policy, Public Finance and the Labour Market in a Second−Best World.” Journal of Public Economics 55, 349–390.
Bovenberg, A. L., and F. van der Ploeg. (1994b). “Consequences of Environmental Reforms for Involuntary Unemployment and Welfare.” Environmental and Resource Economics (forthcoming).
Bovenberg, A. L., and F. van der Ploeg. (1994c). “Green Policies in a Small Open Economy.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 96, 343–363.
Goulder, L. H. (1995). “Environmental Taxation and the “Double Dividend:” A Reader’s Guide.” International Tax and Public Finance 2, 155–182.
Griffin, J. M. (1981). “Engineering and Econometric Interpretations of Energy−Capital Complementarity: Comment.” American Economic Review 71, 1100–1104.
Hausman, J. A. (1985). “Taxes and Labor Supply.” In A. J. Auerbach and M. S. Feldstein (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics 1. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Hesse, D. M., and H. Tarkka. (1986). “The Demand for Capital, Labor and Energy in European Manufacturing Industry Before and After the Oil Price Shocks.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88, 529–546.
Ilmakunnas, P., and H. Törmä. (1989). “Structural Change in Factor Substitution in Finnish Manufacturing.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 91, 705–721.
Keller, W. J. (1980). Tax Incidence: A General Equilibrium Approach. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Oates, W. E. (1991). Pollution Charges as a Source of Public Revenues, Resources for the Future Discussion paper no. QE92−05 (Washington, D.C., USA.
Parry, I. H. (1995). “Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, S64–S77.
Pearce, D. W. (1991). “The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming.” Economic Journal 101, 938–948.
Pindyck, R. S. (1979). “Interfuel Substitution and the Industrial Demand for Energy: An International Comparison.” The Review of Economic Studies LXI.
Schöb, R. (1996). “Evaluating Tax Reforms in the Presence of Externalities.” Oxford Economic Papers 48, 537–555.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Mooij, R.A., Bovenberg, A.L. Environmental Taxes, International Capital Mobility and Inefficient Tax Systems: Tax Burden vs. Tax Shifting. International Tax and Public Finance 5, 7–39 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008606824395
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008606824395