Skip to main content
Log in

A Regime-Level Empirical Model of the Specialist Quote Revision Process

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

NYSE trading is a continuous auction process distinguished by order flow imbalances and non-coincident revision of the bid and the ask. To deal with the aggregation problem presented by non-coincident revision of the quotes, we propose a regime-level empirical model and use it to test the Brock and Kleidon queuing theory of a continuous auction. Using transactions data for IBM for calendar year 1988, Harris, McInish, and Chakravarity (1995) performed a Hausman-type specification test that confirmed the exogeneity of order flow volumes at the bid and the ask. Extending their work, this paper estimates two simultaneous autoregressive ask and bid equations for 50 randomly selected stocks and contrasts thinly traded and volatile stocks. The results support Brock and Kleidon's distinguishing implication—namely, exogenous increases in trading volume raise the ask and lower the bid. Although some queuing system characteristics prove endogenous in thinly traded stocks and in especially volatile stocks, exogenous order flow volume continues to increase spreads across the 50 stock sample. The paper draws conclusions about the appropriate specification of endogeneity, cross-equation disturbances from the bid to the ask, and cross-equation queuing information flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Admati, A.R. and P. Pfleiderer, “A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability.” Review of Financial Studies 1 3–40, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Admati, A.R. and P. Pfleiderer, “Divide and Conquer: ATheory of Intraday and Day-of-theWeek Mean Effects.” Review of Financial Studies, 21, 89–223, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, L., A. Marcus and W. Wilhelm, “What's Special About the Specialist?” Journal of Financial Economics 32, 61–86, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, M. and M. Goldstein “Quotes, Order Flow, and Price Discovery.” Journal of Finance 52, 221–244, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W.A., and A. Kleidon, “Periodic Market Closure and Trading Volume: A Model of Intraday Bids and Asks.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 16, 451–489, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfman, C., From Trades to Orders on the NYSE: Pitfalls in Inferences Using Transactions Data, Working Paper. University of Arizona, 1991.

  • Brown, W.A., W.V. Harlow, and S.M. Tinic, “Risk Aversion, Uncertain Information and Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics 22, 355–85, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K.H., R. Van Ness, and B. Van Ness, “Limit Orders and the Bid-Ask Spread.” Journal of Financial Economics forthcoming, (1999).

  • Easley, D. and M. O'Hara, “Price, Trade Size, and Information in Securities Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics 19, 69–90, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D. and M. O'Hara, “Time and the Process of Security Price Adjustment.” Journal of Finance 47, 577–605, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, F.D. and S. Viswanathan, “Variations in Trading Volume, Return Volatility, and Trading Costs: evidence on recent price formation.” Journal of Finance 48, 187–211, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • French, K.R., “Stock Returns and the Weekend Effect.” Journal of Financial Economics 8, 55–70, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garman, M.B., “Market Microstructure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 257–275, (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M.R. and P.J. Hess, “Day of the Week Effects and Asset Returns.” Journal of Business 54, 579–596, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glosten, L.R. and P.R. Milgrom, “Bid, Ask and Transaction Prices in a Specialist Market with Heterogeneously Informed Traders.” Journal of Financial Economics 14, 71–100, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glosten, L.R., “Insider Trading, Liquidity, and the Role of the Monopolist Specialist.” Journal of Business 62, 211–236, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, L.H., Econometric analysis, New York: Macmillan, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J.P., “Inventories and Stochastic Demand: Equilibrium Models of the Firm and Industry.” Journal of Business 51, 1–42, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J.P. and R. Verrechia, “The Specialist as an Economic Agent.” Journal of Business, 66–68, (1985).

  • Harris, F., “Competing Theories of Firm Decision Making Under Risk.” Southern Economic Journal, 54(2) 271–285, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F., T. McInish, and R. Chakravarty, “Bids and Asks in Disequilibrium Market Microstructure.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 19, 2, 323–345, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F., T. McInish, G. Shoesmith, and Bob Wood, “Cointegration, Error Correction, and Price Discovery on Three Informationally Linked Stock Exchanges.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (1992).

  • Harris, F. and J. Pinder, “A Revenue Management Approach to Demand Management and Order Booking.” Journal of Operations Management, forthcoming (1995).

  • Harris, L., “ATransaction Data Survey of Weekly and Intraday Patterns in Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics 16, 99–117, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., “A Day-End Transaction Price Anomaly.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24, 29–45, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. and V. Panchapagesan, The information content of the limit order book: evidence from NYSE specialist auctions, Working paper, Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck, J., “Trades, Quotes, Inventories and Information.” Journal of Financial Economics 22, 229–252, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck, J., “Measuring the Information Content of Stock Trades.” Journal of Finance 46, 179–207, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck, J. and D. Sosebee, Orders, Trades, Reports and Quotes at the New York Stock Exchange, New York Stock Exchange, 1992.

  • Hausman, J.A., “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, T. and H.R. Stoll, “Optimal Dealer Pricing Under Transactions and Return Uncertainty.” Journal of Financial Economics 9, 47–73, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, P.J. and G. Joh, “The Dependence Between Hourly Prices and Trading Volume.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23, 269283 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleidon, A., “Arbitrage, Non-Trading and Stale Prices.” Journal of Business 65, 483–508, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleidon, A. and R. Whaley, “One Market? Stocks, Futures, and Options During October 1987.” Journal of Finance 47, 851–878, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, J., Elements of Econometrics, New York: Macmillan, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, A.S., “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica 53, 1315–1335, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., “Market Integration and Price Execution for NYSE-Listed Securities.” Journal of Finance 48, 1009–1038, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. and M. Ready, “Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data.” Journal of Finance 46, 733–746, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., B. Mucklow, and M. Ready, “Spreads, Depths, and the Impact of Earnings Information: An intraday analysis.” Review of Financial Studies 6, 345–374, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, A., and S. Smidt, “A Bayesian model of Intraday Specialist Pricing.” Journal of Financial Economics 30, 99–134, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, A. and S. Smidt, “An Analysis of Changes in Specialists Inventories and Quotations.” Journal of Finance 48, 1595–1628, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • McInish, T.H. and R.A. Wood, “A Transactions Data Analysis of the Variability of Common Stock Returns During 1980-1984.” Journal of Banking and Finance 14, 99–112, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • McInish, T.H., and R.A. Wood, “An Analysis of Intraday Patterns in Bid/Ask Spreads for NYSE Stocks.” Journal of Finance 753–764, (1992).

  • McInish, T.H., and R.A. Wood “Hidden Limit Orders on the New York Stock Exchange.” Journal of portfolio management, Journal of Portfolio Management 21, 19–26, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.C., “Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Model.” Journal of Economic Theory 3, 373–413, (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • NYSE Fact Book. New York: New York Stock Exchange, 1991.

  • Pagano, M., “Trading Volume and Asset Liquidity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 255–274, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, M., “The Extreme Value Method for Estimating the Variance of the Rate of Return.” Journal of Business 53, 61–66, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, D.E. and K.N. Berk, “A Limited Information Specification Test.” Econometrica 49, 1079–1085, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, A. “Risk Aversion, Market Liquidity, and Price Efficiency.” Review of Financial Studies 4, 417–441, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R.A., T.H. McInish, and J.K. Ord, “An Investigation of Intraday Data for NYSE Stocks.” Journal of Finance 40, 723–741, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, F.H.d., McInish, T.H. A Regime-Level Empirical Model of the Specialist Quote Revision Process. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 14, 399–417 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008375911021

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008375911021

Navigation