Advertisement

Open Economies Review

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 371–391 | Cite as

The Stability of European Money Demand: An Investigation of M3H

  • Katrin Wesche
Article

Abstract

The paper assesses the stability and predictive performance of a European money demand function as compared to national money demand functions. With respect to the explanatory accuracy, the national functions perform better than the aggregated function. Examination of the residuals of the national money demand equations indicates that currency substitution is not the major cause for the stability of the aggregated money demand function. The aggregate relation mainly seems to reflect German money demand. This conclusion is supported by the instability of aggregated money demand resulting from the exclusion of Germany from the aggregate.

demand for money European Monetary Union cointegration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angeloni, I., C. Cottarelli, and A. Levy (1994) “Cross-Border Deposits, Aggregation, and Money Demand in the Transition to EMU.” Journal of Policy Modeling 16, 27–54.Google Scholar
  2. Artis, M.J., R.C. Bladen-Hovell, and W. Zhang (1993) “A European Money Demand Function.” In P.R. Masson and M.P. Taylor (eds.), Policy Issues in the Operation of Currency Unions. Cambridge, pp. 240–265.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, T. and M.H. Pesaran (1990) Disaggregation in Econometric Modeling. New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bayoumi, T.A. and P.B. Kenen (1993) “How Useful is an EC-wide Monetary Aggregate as an Inter-mediate Target for Europe.” Review of International Economics 1, 209–220.Google Scholar
  5. Boughton, J.M. (1991) “Long-Run Money Demand in Large Industrial Countries.” International Mon-etary Fund Staff Papers 38, 1–32.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, J.Y. and R.J. Shiller (1987) “Cointegration and Tests of Present Value Models.” Journal of Political Economy 95, 1062–1088.Google Scholar
  7. Deaton, A. and J. Muellbauer (1989) Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Deutsche Bundesbank (1995) “Geldnachfrage und Whrungssubstitution in Europa.” Monats-Berichte 1, 33–49.Google Scholar
  9. Dolado, J.J., T. Jenkinson, and S. Sosvilla-Rivero (1990) “Cointegration and Unit Roots.” Journal of Economic Surveys 4, 249–273.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, J.B. and G.H. Orcutt (1969) “Should Aggregation Prior to Estimation Be the Rule?.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 409–420.Google Scholar
  11. Falk, M. and N. Funke (1995) “The Stability of Money Demand in Germany and the EMS: Impact of German Unification.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 131, 470–488.Google Scholar
  12. Funke, N. (1995) Nominale Anker als geldpolitische Koordinationsziele.Tübingen.Google Scholar
  13. Giucca, P. and A. Levy (1992) “Monetary Aggregates and Monetary Policy Coordination on the Way to Economic and Monetary Union: the Role of Cross-Border Deposits.” Temi di Discussione, Banca d'Italia.Google Scholar
  14. Goodhart, C. (1990) “International Financial Linkages.” Special Paper No. 21, LSE Financial Markets Group, Special Paper Series, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  15. Gorman, W.M. (1953) “Community Preference Fields.” Econometrica 21, 63–80.Google Scholar
  16. Granger, C.W.J. (1990) “Aggregation of Time-Series Variables: A Survey.” In T. Barker and M. Hashem Pesaran (eds.), Disaggregation in Econometric Modeling. New York, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
  17. Grunfeld, Y. and Z. Griliches (1960) “Is Aggregation Necessarily Bad?.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 42, 1–13.Google Scholar
  18. Gulde, A.M. and M. Schulze-Ghattas (1992) “Aggregation of Economic Indicators Across Countries: Exchange Rate versus PPP Based GDP Weights.” International Monetary Fund Working Paper, WP/92/36.Google Scholar
  19. Hansen, H. and K. Juselius (1995) CATS in RATS: Cointegration Analysis of Time Series. Evanston (Illinois).Google Scholar
  20. Henry, J. and J. Weidmann (1995) “Asymmetry in the European Monetary System Revisited: Evidence from the Causality Analysis of Daily Eurorates.” Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 40, 125–160.Google Scholar
  21. Herrmann, H., H.-E. Reimers, and K.-H. T ödter (1994) “Weighted Monetary Aggregates for Ger-many.” Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffman, D.L., R.H. Rasche, and M.A. Tieslau (1995) “The Stability of Long-Run Money Demand in Five Industrial Countries.” Journal of Monetary Economics 35, 317–339.Google Scholar
  23. Johansen, S. (1988) “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231–254.Google Scholar
  24. Kremers, J.J.M. and T.D. Lane (1990) “Economic and Monetary Integration and the Aggregate Demand for Money in the EMS.” International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 37, 777–805.Google Scholar
  25. Laidler, D.E.W. (1993) The Demand for Money: Theories, Evidence and Problems. New York.Google Scholar
  26. Lane, T.D. and S.S. Poloz (1992) “Currency Substitution and Cross-Border Monetary Aggregation: Evidence from the G-7.” International Monetary Fund Working Paper, WP/92/81.Google Scholar
  27. Lee, K.C., M.H. Pesaran, and R.G. Pierse (1990) “Testing for Aggregation Bias in Linear Models.” The Economic Journal 100, 137–150.Google Scholar
  28. Monticelli, C. and M. Strauss-Kahn (1991) “European Integration and the Demand for Broad Money.” Notes d' ´ etudes et de recherche, Banque de France.Google Scholar
  29. Monticelli, C. and L. Papi (1996) European Integration, Monetary Co-ordination, and the Demand for Money. Oxford.Google Scholar
  30. OECD (1990) Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures-GK Results. Paris.Google Scholar
  31. Pesaran, M.H., R.G. Pierse, and M.S. Kumar (1989) “Econometric Analysis of Aggregation in the Context of Linear Prediction Models.” Econometrica 57, 861–888.Google Scholar
  32. Rasche, R.H. (1994) “Money Demand and the Term Structure: Some New Ideas on an Old Problem. ” Paper Presented at the Konstanz Seminar on Monetary Theory and Monetary Policy, May 24–27.Google Scholar
  33. Theil, H. (1954) Linear Aggregation of Economic Relations. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  34. Van Riet (1993) “Studies of EC Money Demand: Survey and Assessment.” De Nederlandsche Bank, Quarterly Bulletin 1992/4, 63–75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrin Wesche
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Bonn, Institut für Internationale WirtschaftspolitikBonn

Personalised recommendations