Skip to main content
Log in

Creating Brand Names With Meaning: The Use of Sound Symbolism

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The staggering level and rate of growth of brands being introduced to the marketplace suggests a heightened need to understand how to create effective new brand names. Limited academic research, however, has been conducted in this area. This paper investigates the use of linguistics, specifically sound symbolism, in order to create brand names with inherent meaning. Results of two studies indicate that the sound of a brand name can communicate information about the product, e.g. its size, speed, strength, weight, etc. Brand name sounds can convey product-related information either in the presence or absence of supporting marketing communications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, David A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amanuma, Y. (1974). Dictionary of Onomatopes and Expressives (in Japanese). Tokyo: Tokyodo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Roger, (1958). Words and Things. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chastaing, M. (1958). “Le symbolisme des voyelles: significations des 'I'”, I & II, Journal de Psychologie 55, 403–423 & 461-481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John and Colin Yallop. (1990). An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enis, Ben M. and James E. Stafford. (1969). “Consumers' Perceptions of Product Quality as a function of Various Informational Inputs,” in Marketing Involvement in Society and the Economy, P. McDonald, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlich, Julie, (1995). “Giving Drugs a Good Name,” The New York Times Magazine, September 3, 36–37.

  • Fónagy, I. (1963). Die Metaphern in der Phonetik. The Hague.

  • Gabelentz, G. v. D. (1891). Die Sprachwissensschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig.

  • Gombrich, E. H. (1961). Art and Illusion. New York.

  • Grammont, M. (1901). “Onomatopées et mots expressifs,” Trentenaire de la Société pour l'étude des Langues Romanes, Montpellier, 261–322.

  • Grammont, M. (1913). Le vers francais: ses moyens d'expression, son harmonie. Paris.

  • Haas, M. R. (1969). “Internal Reconstruction of the Nootka-Nitinat Pronominal Suffixes,” International Journal of American Linguistics, 35, 108–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamano, Shoko. (1986). “The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese.” PhD dissertation, University of Florida.

  • Hartley, Robert F. (1992). Marketing Mistakes, 5th Edition. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilmer, H. (1914). Schallnachahmung, Wortschoepfung und Bedeutungswandel. Helle.

  • Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Hohanna, and Ohala, John. (1994). “Introduction: Sound Symbolic Processes”. In Hinton, Nichols, and Ohala (eds.), Sound Symbolism, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, Roman and L. R. Waugh. (1979). The Sound Shape of Language, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesperson, O. (1918). “Nogle men-ord,” Studier tillegnade Esaias Tegner, Lund, 49–55.

  • Jesperson, O. (1933). “Symbolic Value of the Vowel i,” in Linguistica. Selected Papers in English, French and German. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard, 283–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlgren, B. (1962). Sound Symbolism in Chinese, Hong Kong.

  • Keller, Kevin Lane, Susan E. Heckler, & Michael J. Houston. (1998). “The Effects of Brand Name Suggestiveness on Advertising Recall,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (January), 48–57.

  • Kim, Kong-on. (1977). “Sound Symbolism in Korean,” Journal of Linguistics, 13, 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Philip H. (1991). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 7th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged, Peter. (1975). A Course in Phonetics, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapolla, Randy J. (1994). “An experimental investigation into phonetic symbolism as it relates to Mandarin Chinese,” in Hinton, Nichols, and Ohala (eds.), Sound Symbolism, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, Ian R. A. (1978). Introducing Practical Phonetics, Boston: Little, Brown and Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (1962). “Phonetic Symbolism in English Word-Formation,” Indogermanische Forschungen, 64, 146–168 & 256-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Eugene S. (1977). “On the Occurrence and Significance of Motivation-Structural Rules in some Bird and Mammal Sounds,” American Naturalist, 111, 855–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Eugene S. (1994). “Sound Symbolism and Its Role in Non-Human Vertebrate Communication”. In Hinton, Nichols, and Ohala (eds.), Sound Symbolism, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Stanley S. (1933). “Further Experiments in Phonetic Symbolism,” American Journal of Psychology, 45, 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. (1971). “Diminutive consonant symbolism in Western North America.” Language 47: 826–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohala, John. (1984). “An Ethological Perspective on Common Cross-Language Utilization of FO of Voice,” Phonetica, 41, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohala, John. (1994). “The Frequency Code Underlies the Sound-Symbolic Use of Voice Pitch,” in Sound Symbolism, eds. Hinton, Nichols, and Ohala, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterfalvi, J. M. (1970). “Recherches expérimentales sur le symbolisme phonétique,” American Journal of Psychology, 65, 439–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Robert A. (1970). “The Price-Perceived Quality Relationship: Experimental Evidence,” Journal of Marketing Research 7 (November), 525–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Robert A, and Ivan Ross. (1972). “How to Name New Brands,” Journal of Advertising Research, 12 (6), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarin, W. J. (1967). “Determining the Meanings of Ideophones,” Journal of West African Languages, 4, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, Edward, (1929). “A Study in Phonetic Symbolism,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12 (June), 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schloss Ira. (1981). “Chickens and Pickles,” Journal of Advertising Research, 21 (December), 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuchardt, H. (1897). “Keltorom. frog-, frogn-Lautsymbolik,” Zeitschrift fuer romanische Philologie, 21, 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ultan, R. (1978). “Size-Sound Symbolism,” In Joseph Greenberg, (ed) Universals of Human Language, Volume 2: Phonology. Stanford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 1997 Annual Report.

  • Vanden Bergh, Bruce G., Janay Collins, Myrna Schultz and Keith Adler. (1984). “Sound Advice on Brand Names,” Journalism Quarterly, 61, 4, 835–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanden Bergh, Bruce G., Keith Adler and Lauren Oliver. (1987). “Linguistic Distinction Among Top Brand Names,” Journal of Advertising Research, August/September, 39–44.

  • Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought and Reality, New York.

  • Yovovich, B. G. (1988). “What is Your Brand Really Worth?” Adweek's Marketing Week (August 8), 18–21.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klink, R.R. Creating Brand Names With Meaning: The Use of Sound Symbolism. Marketing Letters 11, 5–20 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008184423824

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008184423824

Navigation