Skip to main content
Log in

The Check's in the Mail: Why the United States Lags in the Adoption of Cost-Saving Electronic Payments

  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The United States payment system costs around $225 billion annually and checks account for 75% of all noncash payments. Other electronic payment methods (debit cards, automated clearing house direct deposits, and debits) cost only around one third to one half as much as a check. This paper outlines the main reasons why the shift from checks to cheaper electronic payments has been slow, much slower here than in other countries. We also forecast the future use of checks and electronic payments and end by discussing policy initiatives that may speed up this substitution process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bank for International Settlements. Payment Systems in the Group of Ten Countries. Basle, Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements, December 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank for International Settlements. Statistics on Payment Systems in the Group of Ten Countries. Basle, Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements, December 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank for International Settlements. Statistics on Payment Systems in the Group of Ten Countries. Basle, Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements, December 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeschoten, W. Currency Use and Payment Patterns. Financial and Monetary Policy Studies, vol. 23. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caskey, J., and G. Sellon. Jr. “Is the Debit Card Revolution Finally Here?” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review 79 (1994), 79-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., and R. Schmalensee. The Economics of the Payment Card Industry. Cambridge, MA: National Economic Research Associates, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flatraaker, D., and P. Robinson. “Income, Costs and Pricing in the Payment System.” Norges Bank Economic Bulletin 76 (1995), 321-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food Marketing Institute. A Retailer' Guide to Electronic Payment Systems Costs. Washington, DC: Research Department, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., and J. Ameen. “Discounted Weighted Estimation.” Journal of Forecasting 3 (1984), 285-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., and F. Johnson. “Discount Weighted Least Squares.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 35, no. 10 (1984), 923-932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D. The United States Payments System: Costs, Pricing, Competition and Risk, Monograph Series in Finance and Economics. New York: New York University, Nos. 1 and 2. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D., and A. Berger. “Market Failure and Resource Use: Economic Incentives to Use Different Payment Instruments.” In: David Humphrey, ed., The United States Payments System: Efficiency, Risk, and the Role of the Federal Reserve. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 1990, pp. 45-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D., M. Kim, and B. Vale. Realizing the Gains from Electronic Payments: Costs, Pricing, and Payment Choice. Working paper, Central Bank of Norway, Oslo, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D., L. Pulley, and J. Vesala. “Cash, Paper, and Electronic Payments: A Cross-country Analysis.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, part II (November 1996), 914-939.

  • Johnson, H. “Problems of Efficiency in Monetary Management.” Journal of Political Economy 76 (1968), 971-990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjanovic, S. “Though Hedging, Deluxe Isn't Writing off Checks.” American Banker (1997), 4.

  • Meade, N., and T. Islam. “Forecasting with Growth Curves: An Empirical Comparison.” International Journal of Forecasting 11 (1995), 199-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilson, S. The Nilson Report. Issue 600 Oxnard, CA: HSN Consultants, July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R., and R. Judson. “The Location of United States Currency: How Much Is Abroad?” Federal Reserve Bulletin 82 (1996), 883-903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., and D. Flatraaker. “Costs in the Payments System.” Norgeo Bank Economic Bulletin 76 (1995), 207-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavins, J. “A Comparison of Social Costs and Benefits of Paper Check Presentment and ECP Truncation.” Economic Review. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Economic Review (July, August 1996), 27-44.

  • Tarkka, J. Approaches to Deposit Pricing: A Study in the Determination of Deposit interest and Bank Service Charges. Helsinki, Bank of Finland Publications, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of the Treasury. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Exploring the World of Cyberpayments Washington, DC, 1995.

  • Viren, M. “Demand for Different Payment Media in Finland.” Bank of Finland Bulletin (1994), 12-16.

  • Walsh, C. “Taxation of Interest Income, Deregulation, and the Banking Industry.” Journal of Finance 28 (1983), 1529-1542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. “Are Checks Overused?.” Quarterly Review [Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis] (Fall 1996), 2-12.

  • Young, P., and J. Ord. “The Use of Discounted Least Squares in Technological Forecasting.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 28 (1985), 263-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, P., and J. Ord. “Model Selection and Estimation for Technological Growth Curves.” International Journal of Forecasting 5 (1989), 501-513.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Humphrey, D.B., Pulley, L.B. & Vesala, J.M. The Check's in the Mail: Why the United States Lags in the Adoption of Cost-Saving Electronic Payments. Journal of Financial Services Research 17, 17–39 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008163308353

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008163308353

Navigation