Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 145–151 | Cite as

Photosynthetic and population growth response of the test alga Selenastrum capricornutum Printz to zinc, cadmium and suspended sediment elutriates

  • Michel Pardos
  • Christophe Benninghoff
  • Richard L. Thomas


Short-term 14C-fixation (4 h) Selenastrum capricornutum algal toxicity tests were conducted with Cd (n=8), Zn (n=9) and suspended sediment aqueous elutriates (n=28) and the results were compared to those obtained in a 48 h population growth test. In order to provide more realistic experimental conditions, toxicity tests were carried out in prefiltered nutrient-spiked Lake Geneva water. The population growth inhibition test was significantly more sensitive than the14 C-fixation test for Cd (median EC50-4h and EC50-48h values of 600 and 118 µg L-1, respectively) whereas no significant difference was measured for Zn toxicity (median EC50-4h and EC50-48h values of 97 and 96 µg L-1, respectively). With suspended sediment aqueous elutriates, the relative sensitivity of the two different end points is sample dependent, with ratios of the EC25 for the14 C-fixation: population growth test ranging from <0.26 to >53.3. Elutriate toxicity shows no apparent relationship between the acute and chronic test, indicating that population growth inhibition cannot be derived directly or predicted from14 C-fixation. Both tests with their specific advantages and limitations provide valuable complementary information to measure the impact of single toxicants or complex mixtures on aquatic plants.

14photosynthesis population growth Selenastrum capricornutum suspended sediment elutriate zinc cadmium 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Delistraty D (1986) Growth and photosynthetic response of a freshwater alga, Selenastrum capricornutum, to an oil shale by-product water. Bull. envir. Contam. Toxicol. 36: 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dijkman NA, Van Vlaardingen PLA, Admiraal WA (1997) Biological variation in sensitivity to N-heterocyclic PAHs; Effects of acridine on seven species of micro-algae. Envir. Pollut. 95: 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Garric J, Vindimian E, Ferard JF (1993) Ecotoxicology and waste-waters: Some practical applications. Sci. Total Envir., Supplement (part 2): 1085–1103.Google Scholar
  4. Graney RL, Giesy JP, Clark JR (1995) Field studies. In Rand GM (ed.), Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology: Effects, Environment Fate, and Risk Assessment, 2nd Edition. Taylor & Francis, Washington D.C., USA, 257–305.Google Scholar
  5. Hall NE, Fairchild JF, La Point TW, Heine PR, Ruessler DS, Ingersoll CG (1996) Problems and recommendations in using algal toxicity testing to evaluate contaminated sediments. J. Great Lakes Res. 22: 545–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ISO (1989) Water Quality: Freshwater algal growth inhibition test with Scenedesmus subspicatus and Selenastrum capricornutum. ISO 8692, International organization for standardization.Google Scholar
  7. Lewis MA (1995) Algae and vascular plant tests. In Rand GM (ed.), Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology: Effects, Environment Fate, and Risk Assessment, 2nd Edition. Taylor & Francis, Washington D.C., USA, 135–169.Google Scholar
  8. Nyholm N, Damgaard BM (1990) A comparison of the algal growth inhibition toxicity test method with the short-term 14C-assimilation test. Chemosphere 21: 671–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ongley ED, Thomas RL (1989) Dewatering suspended solids by continuous flow centrifugation: Practical considerations. Hydrological processes 3: 255–260.Google Scholar
  10. Pardos M, Benninghoff C, Thomas RL, Dumas M (1994) Caractérisation écotoxicologique des affluents à leur embouchure. Rapp. Comm. Int. Prot. Eaux Léman contre pollut., Campagne 1993, Lausanne, Switzerland, 171–189.Google Scholar
  11. Pardos M, Benninghoff C, Thomas RL, Dumas M (1996) Caractérisation écotoxicologique des affluents du Léman à leur embouchure et du bassin versant du Rhône aval: complément d'étude. Rapp. Comm. Int. Prot. Eaux Léman contre pollut., Campagne 1995, Lausanne, Switzerland, 219–237.Google Scholar
  12. Plumb RH, Jr, Lee GF (1979) A comparison of C-14 incubation technique. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 11: 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Radetski C, Ferard JF, Blaise C (1994) A semistatic microplate-based phytotoxicity test. Envir. Toxicol. Chem. 14: 299–302.Google Scholar
  14. Ross P, Jarry V, Sloterdijk H (1988) A rapid bioassay using the green alga Selenastrum capricornutum to screen for toxicity in St. Lawrence River sediment elutriates. In Cairns J, Jr, Pratt JR (eds), Functional Testing of Aquatic Biota for Estimating Hazards of Chemicals. ASTM STP 988. Philadelphia, American Society for Testing and Materials, 68–73.Google Scholar
  15. Santiago S, Thomas RL, Larbaigt G, Rossel D, Echeverria MA, Tarradellas J, Loizeau JL, McCarthy L, Mayfield CI, Corvi C (1993) Comparative ecotoxicity of suspended sediment in the lower Rhone river using algal fractionation, Microtox® and Daphnia magna bioassays. Hydrobiologia 25: 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Santiago S, Thomas RL, Loizeau JL, Favarger PY, Vernet JP (1990) Further discussion on the intercomparison of the trace metal concentrations and particle size of fluvial sediment recovered from two centrifuge systems. Hydrological processes 4: 283–287.Google Scholar
  17. Snell TW, Mitchell JL, Burbank SE (1996) Rapid toxicity assessment with microalgae using in vivo esterase inhibition. In Ostrander GK (ed.), Techniques in Aquatic Toxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 13–22.Google Scholar
  18. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters, 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  19. U.S. EPA (1994) Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving water to freshwater organisms. Third Edition. EPA/600/4-91/002. Environmental monitoring systems laboratory, office of research and development, U.S. environmental protection agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  20. U.S. EPA (1989) Algal (Selenastrum capricornutum) growth test. Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  21. Van der Heever JA, Grobbelaar JU (1996) Evaluation of a short-incubation-time small-volume radiocarbon-uptake algal toxicity test. J. appl. Phycol. 8: 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Versteeg DJ (1990) Comparison of short-and long-term toxicity test results for the green alga, Selenastrum capricornutum. In Wang W, Gorsuch JW, Lower WR (eds), Plants for Toxicity Assessment. ASTM STP 1091. Philadelphia, American Society for Testing and Materials, 40–48.Google Scholar
  23. Wong SL, Wainwright JF, Pimenta J (1995) Quantification of total and metal toxicity in wastewater using algal bioassays. Aquat. Toxicol. 31: 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michel Pardos
    • 1
  • Christophe Benninghoff
    • 1
  • Richard L. Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute F.-A. ForelUniversity of GenevaVersoixSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations