Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 79–87 | Cite as

Modelling complexation and electrostatic attraction in heavy metal biosorption by Sargassum biomass

  • Silke Schiewer

Abstract

Biosorption, the passive accumulation of metal ions by biomass, can be used for purifying metal bearing wastewater. Seaweeds represent a readily available source of biosorbent material that possesses a high metal binding capacity. For example, Sargassum can accumulate 2 mequiv of Cd per gram of biomass i.e. 10% of its dry weight. Binding of Cd and Cu by Sargassum is an ion exchange process involving both covalent and ionic bonds. The amount of cations bound covalently or by complexation can be predicted using multi-component sorption isotherms involving 2 types of binding sites, carboxyl and sulphate. A Donnan model was used to account for the effect of ionic strength and electrostatic attraction. The use of a multi-component isotherm that included one term for Na binding was less appropriate than the Donnan model for modelling ionic strength effects. It was possible to predict metal and proton binding as a function of the pH value, metal concentration and ionic strength of the solution.

biosorption seaweeds ion exchange pH ionic strength heavy metals 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartschat BM, Cabaniss SE, Morel FMM (1992) Oligoelectrolyte model for cation binding by humic substances. Envir. Sci. Technol. 26: 284–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buffle J (1988) Complexation Reactions in Aquatic Systems: An Analytical Approach. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, UK: 156–329.Google Scholar
  3. Crist RH, Martin JR, Carr D,Watson JR, Clarke HJ, Crist DR (1994) Interactions of metals and protons with algae. 4. Ion exchange vs. adsorption models and a reassessment of Scatchard plots; ionexchange rates and equilibria compared with calcium alginate. Envir. Sci. Technol. 28: 1859–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crist RH, Oberholser K, Schwartz D, Marzoff J, Ryder D, Crist DR (1988) Interactions of metals and protons with algae. Envir. Sci. Technol. 22: 755–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferguson J, Bubela B (1974) The concentration of Cu (II), Pb (II), and Zn (II) from aqueous solutions by particulate algal matter. Chem. Geol. 13: 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fourest E, Volesky B (1996) Contribution of sulphonate groups and alginate to heavy metal biosorption by the dry biomass of Sargassum fluitans. Envir. Sci. Technol. 30: 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greene B, McPherson R, Darnall D (1987) Algal sorbents for selective metal ion recovery. In: Patterson JW, Pasino R (eds), Metals Speciation, Separation and Recovery, Lewis, Chelsea, MI: 315–338.Google Scholar
  8. Haug A (1961) Dissociation of alginic acid. Acta Chem. Scand. 15: 950–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holan ZR, Volesky B, Prasetyo I (1993) Biosorption of cadmium by biomass of marine algae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 41: 819–825.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Katchalsky A, Michaeli I (1955) Polyelectrolyte gels in salt solutions. J. Polym. Sci. 15: 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kinniburgh DG, Milne CJ, Benedetti MF, Pinheiro JP, Filius J, Koopal LK, Van Riemsdijk WH (1996) Metal ion binding by humic acid: Application of the NICA-Donnan model. Envir. Sci. Technol. 30: 1687–1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuyucak N, Volesky B (1989) Themechanism of cobalt biosorption. Biotechnol. Bioengng 33: 823–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40: 1361–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee RE (1980) Phycology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK: 224–225.Google Scholar
  15. Lin FG, Marinsky JA (1993) A Gibbs-Donnan-based interpretation of the effect of medium counterion concentration levels on the acid dissociation properties of alginic acid and chondroitin sulfate. React. Polym. 19: 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marinsky JA (1987) A two-phase model for the interpretation of proton and metal ion interaction with charged polyelectrolyte gels and their linear analogs. In Stumm W (ed.), Aquatic Surface Chemistry, Wiley Interscience, John Wiley and Sons, NY: 49–81.Google Scholar
  17. Ramelow GJ, Fralick D, Zhao Y (1992) Factors affecting the uptake of aqueous metal ions by dried seaweed biomass. Microbios 72: 81–93.Google Scholar
  18. Schiewer S, Volesky B (1995) Modelling of the proton-metal ion exchange in biosorption. Envir. Sci. Technol. 29: 3049–3058.Google Scholar
  19. Schiewer S, Volesky B (1997a) Ionic strength and electrostatic effects in biosorption of protons. Envir. Sci. Technol. 30: 1863–1871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schiewer S, Volesky B (1997b) Ionic strength and electrostatic effects in biosorption of divalent metal ions and protons. Envir. Sci. Technol. 30: 2478–2485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. South GR, Whittick A (1987) Introduction to Phycology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK: 61–62.Google Scholar
  22. Tipping E (1993) Modelling the competition between alkaline earth cations and trace metal species for binding by humic substances. Envir. Sci. Technol. 27: 520–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsezos M, Volesky B (1981) Biosorption of uranium and thorium. Biotechnol. Bioengng 23: 583–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Volesky B, Holan ZR (1995) Biosorption of heavy metals. Biotechnol. Progr. 11: 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Westall JC, Jones JD, Turner GD, Zachara JM (1995) Models for association of metal ions with heterogeneous environmental sorbents: I. Complexation of Co(II) by leonardite humic acid as a function of pH and NaClO4 concentration. Envir. Sci. Technol. 29: 951–959.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silke Schiewer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyHong Kong Baptist UniversityHong Kong (phone

Personalised recommendations