Small Business Economics

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 383–402 | Cite as

Entrepreneurship and Growth: Creative and Equilibrating Events

  • P. E. Petrakis


This paper investigates the constraints on the growth of creative and equilibrating entrepreneurial events. The empirical material is drawn from the Greek economy. It was observed that the two different levels of entrepreneurial events involve constraints of different kinds. This paper analyses those constraints and their significance for entrepreneurial growth.


Industrial Organization Paper Analysis Empirical Material Equilibrate Event Greek Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch, 1989, ‘Entrepreneurial Strategy and the Presence of Small Firms’, Small Business Economics 1(3), 193-214.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch, 1988, ‘Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis’, American Economic Review 78, 678-690.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch, 1987, ‘Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size’, Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 567-575.Google Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D. B. and Z. J. Acs, 1990, ‘Innovation as a Means of Entry: An Overview’, in P. Geroski and J. Schwalbach (eds.), Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison,London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Barbar J, J. S. Metcalfe and M. Parfeous, 1992, Barriers to Growth in Small Firms, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Barreto, H. (1989), The Entrepreneur in Microeconomic Theory,Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Binks, M. and P. Vale, 1990, Entrepreneurship and Economic Change,New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Boswell, J., 1972, The Rise and Decline of Small Firms,London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. McGree, J. and H. Thomas, 1986, ‘Strategic Groups: Theory, Research and Taxonomy’, Strategic Management Journal 7, 141-160.Google Scholar
  10. Bosworth, D. L. and C. Jacobs, 1987, ‘Barriers to Growth in Small Businesses: Management Attitudes, Behaviour and Abilites’, Discussion Paper no. 36, Coventry: Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  11. Bosworth, D. L. and C. Jacobs, 1992, ‘Management Attitudes, Behaviour and Abilities as Barriers to Growth’, in J. Barber, J. S. Metcalfe and M. Porteous (eds.), Barriers to Growth in Small Firms, Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Baumol, W.J. 1968, ‘Entrepreneurship in Economic Theory’, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 58, 64-71.Google Scholar
  13. Cantillon, R. (1755), Essai sur la nature du commerce en general,ed. H. Higgs, London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  14. Clutterbuck, D. and M. Devine, 1985, ‘The Rise of the Entrepreneuse’, Managament Today 63(January).Google Scholar
  15. Clutterbuck, D. and M. Devine, 1985, ‘Why Start-ups Start’, Management Today,July-Dec.Google Scholar
  16. Dillon, W. R. and M. Goldstein, 1984, Multivariable Analysis,J. Willey & Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, C. D. 1964, ‘Hearings before the Sub-committee on Anti-trust and Monopolies of the Committee of the Judiciary of the United States Senate, Part I: Overall and Conglomerate Aspects’, Washington.Google Scholar
  18. Evans, D. and B. Jovanovic, 1989, ‘Estimates of a Model of Entrepreneurial Choice Under Liquidity Constraints’, Journal of Political Economy 97(4), 808-827.Google Scholar
  19. Fazzari, S., R. Hubbard and B. Peterson, 1987, ‘Financing Constraints and Corporate Investments’, NBER Working Paper no. 2387, Cambridge, Ma.: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  20. Fleming, M. C., 1970, ‘Inter-firm Differences in Productivity and Their Relation to Occupational Structure and Size of Firm’, Manchester School,Sept.: 223-245.Google Scholar
  21. Gill, J., 1985, Factors Affecting the Survival and Growth of the Smaller Company,Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  22. Harmann, H. H., 1967, Modern Factor Analysis,Chicago, Il.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hartley, K. and M. Huby, 1985, ‘Contracting-out in Health and Local Authorities’, Public Money, September, 23-26.Google Scholar
  24. Koutsoyiannis, A., 1977, Theory of Econometrics,McMillan (2nd edn.).Google Scholar
  25. Koutoyannis, A., 1975, Modern Microeconomics,London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  26. Krmenec, A. J., 1990, ‘The Employment Impacts of an Investment Incentive: Differential Efficiency of the Industrial Revenue Bond’, Regional Studies 24, 95-107.Google Scholar
  27. Leibenstein, H., 1966 ‘Allocative Efficiency vs. “X-efficiency”’, American Economic Review 56, 392-415.Google Scholar
  28. Leibenstein, H., 1968 ‘Entrepreneurship and Development’, American Economic Review 58, 72-83.Google Scholar
  29. Lucas, R. E. Jr., 1978, ‘On the Size Distribution of Business Firms’, The Bell Journal of Economics 9, 508-523.Google Scholar
  30. Mann, H. M., 1966, ‘Seller Concentration, Barriers to Entry and Rates of Return in Thirty Industries’, Review of Economics and Statistics 48, 296-307.Google Scholar
  31. Petrakis, P. E. and P. Alexakis, 1991, ‘Analysing Stock-market Behaviour in a Small Market’, Journal of Banking and Finance, Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
  32. Say, J. B., quoted in A. H. Cole, ‘The Entrepreneur: Introductory Remarks’, in H. J. G. Aitken (ed.), Explorations in Enterprise: An Approach to the Study of Entrepreneurship,Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard Univeristy Press, 1965, pp. 32-33.Google Scholar
  33. Scase, R. and R. Goffee, 1980, The Real World of the Small Business Owner,London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  34. Schmalensee, R., 1981, ‘Economies of Scale and Barriers to Entry’, Journal of Political Economy 89, 1228-1238.Google Scholar
  35. Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schumpeter, J. A., 1939, Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process,Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill (1st edn, 2nd impression)Google Scholar
  37. Segal, Quine and Partners 1985, The Cambridge Phenomenon: The Growth of High Technology in a University Town,Cambridge: Segal, Quince and Partners.Google Scholar
  38. Stiglitz, J. E. and A. Weiss, 1981, ‘Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information’, American Economic Review 71(3), 393-410.Google Scholar
  39. Williamson, O. E., 1967, ‘Hierarchical Control and Optimal Firm Size’, Journal of Political Economy 75.Google Scholar
  40. Wildsmith, J. R., 1973, Managerial Theories of the Firm,London: Martin Robinson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. E. Petrakis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations