Skip to main content
Log in

Mortgage Default with Asymmetric Information

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes mortgage-market equilibrium when borrower default costs are private information. By applying the approach of Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976), it is shown that asymmetric information regarding default costs distorts the contract choices available in the mortgage market, preventing safe borrowers (those with high default costs) from fully satisfying their demand for mortgage debt. Large loans are available for a substantial interest-rate premium, but only risky borrowers find this premium worth paying. The article builds on an empirical literature designed to test the ruthless-default principle from option-based models of mortgage pricing. That literature provides evidence against ruthless behavior, suggesting that default costs play an important role in borrower decisions. The article takes a further step by arguing that such costs are private information, which has important implications for market equilibrium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barth, J. R., J. J. Cordes, and A. M. J. Yezer. (1980). “Financial Institution Regulations, Redlining, and Mortgage Markets,” In The Regulation of Financial Institutions, Conference Vol. 21 (pp. 101-143). Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkovec, J., G. B. Canner, T. Hannan, and S. A. Gabriel. (1994). “Race, Redlining and Residential Mortgage Loan Performance,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 9, 263-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J. K. (1994a). “Borrower Mobility, Adverse Selection, and Mortgage Points,” Journal of Financial Intermediation 3, 416-441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J. K. (1994b). “Unobservable Default Propensities, Optimal Leverage, and Empirical Default Models,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 9, 217-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capozza, D. R., D. Kazarian, and T. A. Thomson. (1997). “Mortgage Default in Local Markets,” Real Estate Economics 25, 631-655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buser, S. A., and P. H. Hendershott. (1984). “Pricing Default-Free Mortgages,” Housing Finance Review 3, 405-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T. S., and J. K. Dietrich. (1983). “The Determinants of Default on Conventional Residential Mortgage Loans,” Journal of Finance 38, 1569-1579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chari, V. V., and R. Jagannathan. (1989). “Adverse Selection in a Model of Real Estate Lending,” Journal of Finance 44, 499-508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D. F., and P. H. Hendershott. (1984). “The Pricing of FHA Mortgage Default Insurance,” Housing Finance Review 3, 373-392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, K. B., and J. J. McConnell. (1981). “Valuation of GNMA Mortgage-Backed Securities,” Journal of Finance 36, 599-616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, K. B., and C. S. Spatt. (1985). “An Analysis of Mortgage Contracting: Prepayment Penalties and the Dueon-Sale Clause,” Journal of Finance 40, 293-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, K. B., and C. S. Spatt. (1988). “Private Information and Incentives: Implications for Mortgage Contract Terms and Pricing,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 1, 47-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epperson, J. F., J. B. Kau, D. C. Keenan, and W. J. Muller III. (1985). “Pricing Default Risk in Mortgages,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 13, 261-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, C., and R. Van Order. (1984). “An Option-Based Model of Mortgage Default,” Housing Finance Review 3, 351-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, C., and R. Van Order. (1985). “FHATerminations: A Prelude to Rational Mortgage Pricing,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 13, 273-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott, P. H., and W. R. Schultz. (1993). “Equity and Nonequity Determinants of FHA Single-Family Mortgage Foreclosures in the 1980s,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 21, 405-430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., D. C. Keenan, W. J. Muller III, and J. F. Epperson. (1992). “A Generalized Valuation Model for Fixed-Rate Residential Mortgages,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 24, 279-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., D. C. Keenan, and T. Kim. (1993). “Transaction Cost, Suboptimal Termination and Default Probabilities,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 21, 247-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., D. C. Keenan, and T. Kim. (1994). “Default Probabilities for Mortgages,” Journal of Urban Economics 35, 278-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., D. C. Keenan, W. J. Muller III, and J. F. Epperson. (1995). “The Valuation and Origination of Fixed-Rate Mortgages with Default and Prepayment,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 11, 5-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekkas, V., J. M. Quigley, and R. Van Order. (1993). “Loan Loss Severity and Optimal Mortgage Default,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 21, 353-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy, S. F. (1996). “Mortgage Valuation under Optimal Prepayment,” Review of Financial Studies 9, 817-844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, L. L., and A. Yavas. (1997). “Adjustable and Fixed Rate Mortgages as a Screening Mechanism for Default Risk.” Journal of Urban Economics, forthcoming.

  • Quigley, J. M., and R. Van Order. (1990). “Effciency in the Mortgage Market: The Borrower's Perspective,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 18, 237-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, J. M., and R. Van Order. (1995). “Explicit Tests of Contingent Claim Models of Mortgage Default,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 11, 99-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddiough, T., and H. E. Thompson. (1993). “Commercial Mortgage Pricing and Unobservable Borrower Default Costs,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 21, 265-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., and J. E. Stiglitz. (1976). “Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay in the Economics of Imperfect Information,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 629-649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, R., and N. Wallace. (1997). “Mortgage Choice: What's the Point.” Real Estate Economics, 26, 173-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., and A. Weiss. (1981). “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information,” American Economic Review 71, 393-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titman, S., and W. N. Torous. (1989). “Valuing Commercial Mortgages: An Empirical Evaluation of the Contingent-Claims Approach to Pricing Risky Debt,” Journal of Finance 44, 345-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandell, K. D., and T. Thibodeau. (1985). “Estimation of Mortgage Defaults Using Disaggregate Loan History Data,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 13, 292-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, T. L. T. (1992). “Self-Selection in the Fixed-Rate Mortgage Market,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 20, 359-391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yezer, A. M. J., R. F. Phillips, and R. P. Trost. (1994). “Bias in Estimates of Discrimination and Default in Mortgage Lending: The Effects of Simultaneity and Self-Selection,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 9, 197-215.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brueckner, J.K. Mortgage Default with Asymmetric Information. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 20, 251–274 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007885109086

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007885109086

Navigation