Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 19, Issue 1–3, pp 169–170 | Cite as

(Mis)Construal Processes for Contingent Valuation Questions: A Commentary on “Construal Processes in Preference Assessment”

  • Timothy L. Mcdaniels


Economic Theory Environmental Economic Contingent Valuation Preference Assessment Construal Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baron, J. and M. Spranca. (1997). ''Protected Values,'' Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. Fischhoff, B. and L. A. Cox, Jr. (1985). ''Conceptual Framework for Benefits Assessment.'' In J. Bentkover, V. Covello, and J. Mumpower eds., Benefits Assessment: The State of the Art. Dordrecht: Kluwer, D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  3. Fischhoff, B., N. Welch, and S. Frederick. (1999). ''Construal Processes in Preference Assessment,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 139–164.Google Scholar
  4. Gregory, R., S. Lichtenstein, and P. Slovic. (1993). ''Valuing Environmental Resources: A Constructive Approach,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 177–197.Google Scholar
  5. MacCrimmon, K. and D. Wehrung. (1986). Taking Risks. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Schkade, D. A. and J. W. Payne. (1994). ''How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation,'' Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26, 88–109.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy L. Mcdaniels
    • 1
  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations