Skip to main content
Log in

Construal Processes in Preference Assessment

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interpreting people's preferences requires understanding how they have construed their tasks, interpreting the proposed alternatives in the context where the evaluation is being made. With stylized experimental or survey choices, researchers' challenge is typically identifying the features that people add in order to make their task real enough to answer (i.e., how they read between the lines). With rich “real world” choices, researchers' challenge is typically identifying the features that people neglect, as they reduce their task to manageable complexity (i.e., which lines they choose to read). In either case, if people misunderstand or mistrust the stated transaction, they may evaluate a different offer than the one that was proposed. Such misconstruals are a nuisance for investigators, insofar as dealing with them delays the measurements that motivated the research. However, they can also provide an opportunity, by focusing attention on how people give meaning to choice situations. This article describes procedures for studying construal processes, strategies for getting people to answer the questions that interest researchers, and options for interpreting responses when people construe questions differently than was intended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, G. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, A., M. G. Morgan, B. Fischhoff, and D. Read. (1994). ''What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? Part 1. Mental models,'' Risk Analysis 14, 959–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T., W. M. Hangmann, R. J. Kopp, J. A. Krosnick, R. C. Mitchell, S. Presser, P. A. Rudd, and V. K. Smith. (1994). ''Prospective Interim Lost Use Value Due to DDT and PCB Contamination in the Southern California Bight,'' NOAA Contract No. 50-DGNC-1-D0007.

  • Clemen, R. (1991). Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. Boston: PWS-Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. and B. Corrigan. (1974). ''Linear Models in Decision Making,'' Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desvousges, W. H., V. K. Smith, and A. Fisher. (1987). ''Option Price Estimates for Water Quality Improvement: A Contingent Valuation Study for the Monongahela River,'' Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14, 248–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowlatabadi, H. and M. G. Morgan, (2000). ICAM: Integrated Assessment of Global Change, book manuscript in preparation.

  • Earle, T. C. and G. T. Cvetkovich, (1995). Social Trust. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, A. and H. Simon. (1994). Verbal Reports as Data, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1975). ''Hindsight /foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment under Uncertainty,'' Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 288–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1991). ''Value Elicitation: Is There Anything in There?'' American Psychologist 46, 835–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1992). ''Giving Advice: Decision Theory Perspectives on Sexual Assault,'' American Psychologist, 47, 577–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1996). ''The Real World: What Good Is It?'' Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65, 232–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1997). ''What Do Psychologists Want? Contingent Valuation as a Special Case of Asking Questions.'' In W. Pommerehne, N. Schwarz and R. Kopp eds., Determining the Value of Nonmarketed Goods, pp. 189–217. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. in press. ''Why Cancer Risk Communication Can Be Hard,'' Journal of National Cancer Institute.

  • Fischhoff, B., A. Bostrom, and M. J. Quadrel. (1997). ''Risk Perception and Communication.'' In R. Detels, J. McEwen, and G. Omenn eds., Oxford Textbook of Public Health, pp. 987–1002. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., J. Downs, and W. Bruine de Bruin. (1998). ''Adolescent Vulnerability: A Framework for Behavioral Interventions,'' Applied and Preventive Psychology 7, 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. and L. Furby. (1986). ''A Review and Critique of Tolley, Randall et al. ''Establishing and Valuing the Effects of Improved Visibility in the Eastern United States,'' ERI Technical Report 86–8. Eugene, OR: Eugene Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. and L. Furby. (1988). ''Measuring Values: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Transactions,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 147–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., M. J. Quadrel, M. Kamlet, G. Loewenstein, R. Dawes, P. Fischbeck, S. Klepper, J. Leland, and P. Stroh. (1993). ''Embedding Effects: Stimulus Representation and Response Modes,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 211–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein. (1980). ''Knowing What You Want: Measuring Labile Values.'' In T. Wallsten ed., Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior, pp. 117–141. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. and C. Charles. (1995). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1989). Intuitive Theories. London: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, G. T. and P. Stern. (1996). Environmental Problems and Human Behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., R. Vallone, and A. Tversky. (1985). ''The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences,'' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17, 295–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, E. (1997). ''The Gambler's Fallacy,'' Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.

  • Gregory, R., S. Lichtenstein, and P. Slovic. (1993). ''Valuing Environmental Resources: A Constructive Approach,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). ''Logic and Conversation.'' In D. Davidson and G. Harman eds., The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: Dickenson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L. and R. T. Zacks. (1984). ''Automatic and Effortful Processes in Memory,'' Journal of Experiment Psychology: General 108, 356–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. J. (1990). ''Conversational Processes and Causal Explanation,'' Psychological Bulletin 107, 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. A. (1989). ''Knowledge Maps,'' Management Science 35, 903–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. K. (1992). Value-Focused Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linville, P. W., G. W. Fischer, and B. Fischhoff. (1993). ''AIDS Risk Perceptions and Decision Biases.'' In J. B. Pryor and G. D. Reeder eds., The Social Psychology of HIV Infection, pp. 5–38. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, L. (1982). ''Doing the Impossible,'' Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 8, 626–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. (1969). ''Suspiciousness of Experimenter's Intent,'' In R. Rosenthal and R. L. Rosnow eds., Artifact in Behavioral Research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G. (1995). ''Climate Change: A Citizens Guide,'' Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University.

  • Morgan, M. G., B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom, L. Lave, and C. J. Atman. (1992). ''Communicating Risk to the Public,'' Environmental Science and Technology 26, 2048–2056.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1982). Survey Measure of Subjective Phenomena. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). Understanding Risk. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E. and T. D. Wilson. (1977). ''Telling More Than We Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes,'' Psychological Review 84, 231–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W., J. R. Bettman, and D. A. Schkade. (1999). ''Measuring Constructed Preferences: Towards a Building Code,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 243–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. R. and L. R. Beach. (1967). ''Man as an Intuitive Statistician,'' Psychological Bulletin 69(1), 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, E. C. (1989). Bias in Quantifying Judgment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, D., A. Bostrom, M. G. Morgan, B. Fischhoff, and T. Smuts. (1994). ''What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? Part 2. Survey Studies of Educated Laypeople,'' Risk Analysis, 14, 971–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. and R. L. Rosnow. eds. (1969). Artifact in Behavioral Research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schkade, D. A. and J. W. Payne. (1993). ''Where Do the Numbers Come From? How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions.'' In J. A. Hausman ed., Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, pp. 271–293. Boston: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schkade, D. A. and J. W. Payne. (1994). ''How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation,'' Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26, 88–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriver, K. A. (1989). ''Evaluating Text Quality: The Continuum from Text-Focused to Reader-Focused Methods,'' IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 32, 238–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1997). Context Effects in Survey Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1999). ''Self-Reports: How the Questions Shape the Answers,'' American Psychologist, 54, 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaklee, H. and B. Fischhoff. (1990). ''The Psychology of Contraceptive Surprises: Judging the Cumulative Risk of Contraceptive Failure,'' Journal of Applied Psychology 20, 385–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. and S. Lichtenstein, (1971). ''Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment,'' Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,6, 649–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D., and I. Altman, eds. (1987). Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 2 Vols. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolley, G., A. Randall, et al. (1986). ''Establishing and Valuing the Effects of Improved Visibility in the Eastern United States,'' Report to the Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Tune, G. S. (((1967))4). ''Response Preferences: A Review of Some Relevant Literature,'' Psychological Bulletin, 61, 286–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman, (1974). ''Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,'' Science 185, 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, N. and B. Fischhoff, (1999). ''Social Context and Environmental Valuations,'' Manuscript under editorial review.

  • Wilcox, R. R. (1998). ''How Many Scientific Discoveries Have Been Lost by Ignoring Modern Statistical Methods?'' American Psychologist, 53, 300–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., D. J. Lisle, J. W. Schooler, S. D. Hodges, K. J. Klaaren, and S. J. LaFleur. (1993). ''Introspecting About Reasons Can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction,'' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19, 331–339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischhoff, B., Welch, N. & Frederick, S. Construal Processes in Preference Assessment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 139–164 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007823326511

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007823326511

Navigation