Advertisement

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 19, Issue 1–3, pp 111–136 | Cite as

Anchoring and Acquiescence Bias in Measuring Assets in Household Surveys

  • Michael D. Hurd
Article

Abstract

Cognitive psychology has identified and studied extensively a number of cognitive anomalies that may be important for the assessment of the economic status of individuals and households. In particular the use of brackets to elicit information about income and assets in surveys of households can interact with acquiescence bias and anchoring to cause bias in the estimates of the distributions of income and assets. This paper uses data from the Health and Retirement Study and the Asset and Health Dynamics Study to find that, as predicted by psychology, bracketing can produce bias in population estimates of assets.

assets anchoring acquiescence bias 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chapman, G. B. and E. J. Johnson. (1994). ''The Limits of Anchoring,'' Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7, 223–242.Google Scholar
  2. Couch, Arthur and Kenneth Keniston. (1960). ''Yeasayers and Naysayers: Agreeing Response Set as a Personality Variable,'' Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(2), 151–174.Google Scholar
  3. Hoynes, Hilary, Michael Hurd, and Harish Chand. (1998). ''Household Wealth of the Elderly under Alternative Imputation Procedures.'' In David Wise ed., Inquiries in the Economics of Aging, pp. 229–254. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hurd, Michael D. (1997). ''A Model of the Effects of Anchoring on Population Distributions,'' Mimeo, RAND.Google Scholar
  5. Hurd, Michael D. et al. (1998). ''Consumption and Saving Balances of the Elderly: Experimental Evidence on Survey Response Bias.'' In D. Wise ed., Frontiers in the Economics of Aging, pp. 353–387. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jackson, Douglas N. and Samuel Messick. (1958). ''Content and Style in Personality Assessment,'' Psychological Bulletin 55(4), 243–252.Google Scholar
  7. Jacowitz, K. E. and Kahneman, D. (1995). ''Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks,'' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21, 1161–1166.Google Scholar
  8. Juster, F. Thomas and Richard Suzman. (1995). ''An Overview of the Health and Retirement Study,'' Journal of Human Resources 30, S7-S56.Google Scholar
  9. Klayman, Joshua and Young-Won Ha. (1987). ''Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Information in Hypothesis Testing,'' Psychological Review 94(2), 211–228.Google Scholar
  10. Kruglanski, A. W. and T. Freund. (1983). ''The Freezing and Unfreezing of Lay-Inferences: Effects on Impressional Primacy, Ethnic Stereotyping, and Numerical Anchoring,'' Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19, 448–468.Google Scholar
  11. Locander, William B. and John P. Burton. (1976). ''The Effect of Question Form on Gathering Income Data by Telephone,'' Journal of Marketing Research, XIII, 189–192.Google Scholar
  12. Poulton, E. C. (1989). Bias in Quantifying Judgements, Hove U.K. and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Ray, John J. (1983). ''Reviving the Problem of Acquiescent Response Bias,'' The Journal of Social Psychology 121, 81–96.Google Scholar
  14. Schuman, Howard and Stanley Presser. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, James P. (1995). ''Racial and Ethnic Differences in Wealth,'' Journal of Human Resources 30, S158-S183.Google Scholar
  16. Strack, Fritz and Thomas Mussweiler. (1997). ''Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility,'' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 437–446.Google Scholar
  17. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. (1974). ''Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,'' Science 185, 1124–1131.Google Scholar
  18. Wilson, T. D. et al. (1996). ''A New Look at Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring and Its Antecedents,'' Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125, 387–402.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. Hurd
    • 1
  1. 1.RAND, SUNYStony Brook

Personalised recommendations