Group

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 13–21 | Cite as

On the Future of Group Therapy Theory

  • Victor L. Schermer
Article

Abstract

The author presents a hypothetical view of group therapy theories as they may evolve over the first decades of the New Milennium. Looking at the problem of prediction from the standpoint of postmodernism and social constructivism, the importance of these perspectives as frameworks of the social sciences is emphasized. The influence of general systems theory, Foulkesian group analysis, object relations theory, self psychology, cognitive-behavioral psychology, and neuropsychiatry are briefly examined with respect to the expected evolution of increasingly sophisticated, detailed, and nuanced theories of group psychology and group psychotherapy.

group theory social constructivism postmodernism systems theory object relations theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ahlin, G. (1995). The interpersonal world of the infant and the foundation matrix for the groups and networks of the person. Group Analysis, 28: 5–20.Google Scholar
  2. Ashbach, C. & Schermer, V. L. (1987). Object relations, the self, and the group. London: Routledge. Reprinted 1994.Google Scholar
  3. Agazarian, Y. (1997). Systems-centered therapy for groups. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  5. De Mare, P., Piper, R., & Thompson, S. (1991). Koinonia: From hate, through dialogue, to culture in the large group. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Durkin, J. (1981). Living groups: Group psychotherapy and general system theory. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  8. Edelman, G. M. (1988). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Fine, C. S. & Madden, N. E. (in press). The role of group psychotherapy in the treatment of dissociative identity disorder and allied dissociative disorders. In Klein, R. & Schermer, V. L. eds. Group psychotherapy for psychological trauma. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  10. Ganzarain, R. (1977). General systems and object relations theories: Their usefulness in group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 27: 441–456.Google Scholar
  11. Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Gibbard, G. S. Hartmann, J. J. & Mann, R. D., eds. (1974). Analysis of Groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Gordon, J. (1994). Bion's post-Experiences in Groups thinking on groups: A clinical example of-K. In Schermer, V. L. and Pines, M. (eds.), Ring of Fire. London: Routledge, pp. 107–127.Google Scholar
  14. Hinshelwood, R. (1994). Attacks on the reflective space: Containing primitive emotional states. In Schermer, V. L. and Pines, M. (eds.), Ring of Fire. London: Routledge, pp. 86–106.Google Scholar
  15. Kanas, N. (1998). Group Therapy with Schizophrenic and Bipolar Patients: Integrative approaches. In Schermer, V. L. and Pines, M. (eds.), Group psychotherapy of the psychoses: Concepts, interventions, and contexts. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, E. J. and Rice, A. K. (1967). Systems of Organization. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  17. Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Schermer, V. L. & Pines, M. (1994). Between theory and practice, light and heat: On the use of theory in the “Ring of Fire.” In Schermer, V. L., and Pines, M. (eds.), Ring of Fire. London: Routledge, pp. 9–35.Google Scholar
  20. Snow, C. P. (1993). The two cultures. Reissue edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Stolorow, R. D., Atwood, G. E., and Brandchaft, B. eds. (1994). The intersubjective perspective. Northvale: Aronson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eastern Group Psychotherapy Society 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor L. Schermer
    • 1
  1. 1.Philadelphia

Personalised recommendations