Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian Modeling and Inference for Geometrically Anisotropic Spatial Data

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A geometrically anisotropic spatial process can be viewed as being a linear transformation of an isotropic spatial process. Customary semivariogram estimation techniques often involve ad hoc selection of the linear transformation to reduce the region to isotropy and then fitting a valid parametric semivariogram to the data under the transformed coordinates. We propose a Bayesian methodology which simultaneously estimates the linear transformation and the other semivariogram parameters. In addition, the Bayesian paradigm allows full inference for any characteristic of the geometrically anisotropic model rather than merely providing a point estimate. Our work is motivated by a dataset of scallop catches in the Atlantic Ocean in 1990 and also in 1993. The 1990 data provide useful prior information about the nature of the anisotropy of the process. Exploratory data analysis (EDA) techniques such as directional empirical semivariograms and the rose diagram are widely used by practitioners. We recommend a suitable contour plot to detect departures from isotropy. We then present a fully Bayesian analysis of the 1993 scallop data, demonstrating the range of inferential possibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Akima, H., 1978, A method of bivariate interpolation and smooth surface fitting for irregularly distributed data points: ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, v. 4, no. 2, p. 148–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anton, H., 1984, Calculus, 2nd Ed.: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1108 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, L., and Chao, L., 1994, Estimates of a multidimensional covariance function in case of anisotropy: Math. Geology, v. 26, no. 2, p. 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N., 1993, Statistics for spatial data: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 900 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira, V., Kedem, B., and Short, D., 1997, Bayesian prediction of transformed Gaussian random fields: Jour. Am. Stat. Assoc., v. 92, no. 440, p. 1422–1433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, P., Liang, K.-L., and Zeger, S., 1994, Analysis of longitudinal data: Oxford Science Publications, New York, 253 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecker, M. D., and Gelfand, A. E., 1997, Bayesian variogram modeling for an isotropic spatial process: Jour. of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Stat., v. 2, no. 4, p. 347–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecker, M. D., and Heltshe, J., 1994, Geostatistical estimates of scallop abundance, in Lange, N., Ryan, L., Billard, L., Brillinger, D., Conquest, L., and Greenhouse, J., eds., Case studies in biometry: John Wiley and Sons, New York, p. 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudard, M., Karson, M., Linder, E., and Sinha, D., 1995, Modeling precipitation using Bayesian spatial analysis: ASA Proceedings of the Section on Bayesian Inference, p. 173–177.

  • Haining, R., 1990, Spatial data analysis in the social and environmental sciences: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 409 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handcock, M., and Stein, M., 1993, A Bayesian analysis of kriging: Technometrics, v. 35, no. 4, p. 403–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handcock, M., and Wallis, J., 1994, An approach to statistical spatial-temporal modeling of meteorological fields (with discussion): Jour. of the Am. Stat. Assoc., v. 89, no. 426, p. 368–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks, E., and Srivastava, R., 1989, An introduction to applied geostatistics: Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A., and Froidevaux, R., 1982, Anisotropic hole-effect modeling: Math. Geology, v. 14, no. 3, p. 217–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A., and Huijbregts, C., 1978, Mining geostatistics: Academic Press, New York, 600 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaluzny, S., Vega, S., Cardosa, T., and Shelly, A., 1996, S+SpatialStats user's manual: MathSoft Inc., Seattle, 226 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski, P., Molinska, A., and Molinska, K., 1996, Elliptical anisotropy in practice-a study of air monitoring data: Environmetrics, v. 7, p. 291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamorey, G., and Jacobson, E., 1995, Estimation of semivariogram parameters and evaluation of the effects of data sparsity: Math. Geology, v. 27, no. 3, p. 327–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le, N., and Zidek, J., 1992, Interpolation with uncertain spatial covariances: A Bayesian alternative to kriging: Jour. Multivariate Analysis, v. 43, p. 351–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G., 1963, Principles of geostatistics: Economic Geology, v. 58, p. 1246–1266.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBratney, A., and Webster, R., 1986, Choosing functions for semi-variograms of soil properties and fitting them to sampling estimates: Jour. Soil Science, v. 37, p. 617–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. F. M., and Gelfand, A. E., 1992, Bayesian statistics without tears: A sampling-resampling perspective: Am. Statistician, v. 46, no. 2, p. 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchia, A., 1988, Estimation and model identification for continuous spatial processes: Jour. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, v. 50, no. 2, p. 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M., 1993, Approximating posterior distributions by mixtures, Jour. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, v. 55, no. 2, p. 563–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D., 1993, Another look at anisotropy in geostatistics: Math. Geology, v. 25, no. 4, p. 453–470.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ecker, M.D., Gelfand, A.E. Bayesian Modeling and Inference for Geometrically Anisotropic Spatial Data. Mathematical Geology 31, 67–83 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007593314277

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007593314277

Navigation