Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 31, Issue 7, pp 793–840 | Cite as

Dispersive Particle Transport: Identification of Macroscale Behavior in Heterogeneous Stratified Subsurface Flows

  • Ali Fadili
  • Rachid Ababou
  • Roland Lenormand
Article

Abstract

Dispersive mass transport processes in naturally heterogeneous geological formations (porous media) are investigated based on a particle approach to mass transport and on its numerical implementation using LPT3D, a Lagrangian Particle Tracking 3D code. We are currently using this approach for studying microscale and macroscale space–time behavior (advection, diffusion, dispersion) of tracer plumes, solutes, or miscible fluids, in 1,2,3-dimensional heterogeneous and anisotropic subsurface formations (aquifers, petroleum reservoirs). Our analyses are based on a general advection-diffusion model and numerical scheme where concentrations and fluxes are discretized in terms of particles. The advection-diffusion theory is presented in a probabilistic framework, and in particular, a numerical analysis is developed for the case of advective transport and rotational flows (numerical stability of the explicit Euler scheme). The remainder of the paper is devoted to the behavior of concentration, mass flux density, and statistical moments of the transported tracer plume in the case of heterogeneous steady flow fields, where macroscale dispersion occurs due to geologic heterogeneity and stratification. We focus on the case of perfectly stratified or multilayered media, obtained by generating many horizontal layers with a purely random transverse distribution of permeability and horizontal velocity. In this case, we calculate explicitly the exact mass concentration field C(x,t), mass flux density field f(x, t), and moments. This includes spatial moments and dispersion variance σ2 x (t) on a finite domain L, and temporal moments on a finite time scale T, e.g., the “mass variance” of arrival times σ2 T (x). The moments are related to flux concentrations in a way that takes explicitly into account finite space–time scales of analysis (time-dependent tracer mass; spatially variable “flow through” mass). The multilayered model problem is then used in numerical experiments for testing different ways of recovering information on tracer plume migration, dispersion, concentration and flux fields. Our analyses rely on a probabilistic interpretation that emerges naturally from the particle approach; it is based on spatial moments (particle positions), temporal moments (mass weighted arrival times), and probability densities (both concentrations and fluxes). Finally, as an alternative to direct estimations of the flux and concentration fields, we formulate and study the “Moment Inverse Problem.” Solving the MIP yields an indirect method for estimating the space–time distribution of flux concentrations based on observed or estimated moments of the plume. The moments may be estimated from field measurements, or numerically computed by particle tracking as we do here.

tracer transport random media stratified media multilayered media macrodispersion Lagrangian particle tracking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ababou, R., Gelhar, L. W., 1990, Self-similar randomness and spectral conditioning: Analysis of scale effects in subsurface hydrology, in Cushnam, J., ed., Dynamics of Fluids in Hierarchical Porous Media: Academic Press, New York, Chap. XIV, 505 p.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, E. E., Gelhar, L. W., 1992, Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer: 2. Spatial moments analysis: Water Resources Res., v. 28, no. 12, p. 3293–3307.Google Scholar
  3. Bagtzoglou, A. C., Tompson, A. F. B., Dougherty, D. E., 1992, Projection functions for particle-grid methods: Num. Methods for Partial Diff. Eq., 8, p. 325–340.Google Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya, R. N., Gupta, V. K., 1983, A theoretical explanation of solute dispersion in saturated porous media at the Darcy scale: Water Resources Res., v. 19, no. 4, p. 938–944.Google Scholar
  5. Black, T. C., Freyberg, D. L., 1987, Stochastic modeling of vertically averaged concentration uncertainty in a perfectly stratified aquifer: Water Resources Res., v. 23, no. 6, p. 997–1004.Google Scholar
  6. Chatwin, P. C., 1970, The approach to normality of the concentration distribution of a solute in a solvent flowing along a straight pipe: Jour. Fluid Mech., v. 43, part. 2, p. 321–352.Google Scholar
  7. Cvetkovic, V. D., Shapiro, A. M., 1989, Solute advection in stratified formations: Water Resources Res., v. 25, no. 6, p. 1283–1289.Google Scholar
  8. Cvetkovic, V. D., Shapiro, A. M., Dagan, G., 1992, A solute flux approach to transport in heterogeneous formations, 2. Incertainty analysis: Water Resources Res., v. 28, no. 5, p. 1377–1388.Google Scholar
  9. Dagan, G., 1983, Comment on “Stochastic modeling of mass transport in a random velocity field” by D. H. Tang, F. W. Schwartz and L. Smith: Water Resources Res., v. 19, no. 4, p. 1049–1052.Google Scholar
  10. Dagan, G., 1985, Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities: the inverse problem, Water Resources Res., v. 21, no. 1, p. 65–72.Google Scholar
  11. Dagan, G., 1990, Transport in heterogeneous porous formations: Spatial moments, ergodicity, and effective dispersion: Water Resources Res., v. 26, no. 6, p. 1281–1290.Google Scholar
  12. Dagan, G., Cvetkovic, V., Shapiro, A., 1992, A solute flux approach to transport in heterogeneous formations, 1. The general framework: Water Resources Res., v. 28, no. 5, p. 1369–1376.Google Scholar
  13. Fadili, A., Ababou, R., Lenormand, R., 1997, Dispersive particle transport: Identification of macroscale behavior in heterogeneous stratified groundwater flows, in Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., ed., Proceedings 3rd Annual Conf. of the Internat. Assoc. Math. Geol., Barcelona, Spain, v. 2, p. 825–829.Google Scholar
  14. Feller, W., 1966, An introduction to probability and its applications: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, v. II, p. 626.Google Scholar
  15. Güven, O., Molz, F. J., Melville, J. G., 1984, An analysis of dispersion in a stratified aquifer: Water Resources Res., v. 20, no. 10, p. 1337–1354.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, Ch. F, Gorelick, S. M., 1995, Mapping hydraulic conductivity: sequential conditioning with measurements of solute arrival time, hydraulic head, and local conductivity: Water Resources Res., v. 31, no. 7, p. 1615–1626.Google Scholar
  17. Havilland, E. K., 1936, On the momentum problem for distribution functions in more than one dimension: American Jour. Math., v. 58, p. 164–168.Google Scholar
  18. Landau, H., 1987, Maximum entropy and the moment problem: Bull. Am. Math. Soc. v. 16, p. 47–77.Google Scholar
  19. Lévy, P., 1965, Processus Stochastique et Mouvement Brownien: Paris Gauthier-Villars & Cie.Google Scholar
  20. Longman, I. M., 1984, Some aspects of the finite moment problem: Jour. Comput. and Appl. Math., v. 10, p. 141–146.Google Scholar
  21. Lukacs, E., Laha, R. G., 1964, Applications of characteristic functions: Griffin's Statistical Monographs & Courses, no. 14, p. 202.Google Scholar
  22. Matheron, G., DeMarsily G., 1980, Is transport in porous media always diffusive? A counterexample: Water Resources Res., v. 16, no. 5, p. 901–917.Google Scholar
  23. Rajaram, H., Gelhar, L. W., 1993, Plume scale-dependent dispersion in heterogeneous aquifers. 1. Lagrangian analysis in a stratified aquifer: Water Resources Res., v. 29, no. 9, p. 3249–3260.Google Scholar
  24. Raviart, P. A., 1983, Particle approximation of linear hyperbolic equation of the first order, in Numerical Methods in Fluids Dynamics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, Chap. I.Google Scholar
  25. Saito, Y., Mitsui, T., 1992, Stability analysis of numerical schemes for stochastic differential equations: Technical Research Report, no. 9202, Nagoya University, Japan.Google Scholar
  26. Salandin, P., Rinaldo, A., Dagan, G., 1991, A note on transport in stratified formations by flow tilted with respect to the bedding: Water Resources. Res., v. 27, no. 11, p. 3009–3017.Google Scholar
  27. Shapiro, A. M., Cvetkovic, V. D., 1988, Stochastic analysis of solute arrival time in heterogeneous porous media: Water Resources Res., v. 24, no. 10, p. 1711–1718.Google Scholar
  28. Van Kampen, N. G., 1961, Apower series expansion of the master equation: Canadian Journal of Physics, v. 39.Google Scholar
  29. Vanmarcke, E., 1983, Random Fields Analysis and Synthesis: MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Fadili
    • 1
  • Rachid Ababou
    • 1
  • Roland Lenormand
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut de Mécanique des Fluides de ToulouseToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Institut Français du PétroleRueil-MalmaisonFrance

Personalised recommendations