Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 619–642 | Cite as

Texture Analysis of Grey-Tone Images by Mathematical Morphology: A Nondestructive Tool for the Quantitative Assessment of Stone Decay

  • António Maurício
  • Carlos Figueiredo
Article

Abstract

Both a low-cost and easily handled nondestructive methodology and its validation criterion are proposed. The methodology is based on image analysis by mathematical morphology for the assessment of decayed stone surfaces in historic limestone buildings. It is adapted to follow the evolution, at macroscopic time and space scales, of stone materials used in art pieces and monument building stones. This methodology is applied to the quantitative analysis of textures of static grey-tone CCD video camera images representative of flat stone structures that cannot be handled. These structures line the walls inside an important church, Basílica da Estrela, built in the 18th century and located in the city of Lisbon. Detailed visual/tactile observation shows that these flat vertical structures are more or less damaged depending on their position inside the church. The damage is possibly associated with different environment conditions both from the atmosphere inside the church and from contact with the walls of the church. The presence of these pathologies breaks down the order and organization of sound rock textures introducing changes in the topographical and optical characteristics of the texture of the surfaces. This new methodology is based on the granulometry and covariance analysis of grey-tone images corresponding to the structures studied. The validation criterion allows the results of the proposed methodology to be compared to the results of a previous qualitative study made by experts in the field using visual assessment and monument mapping as a valid methodology to assess the degree of decay. This procedure is based on optical and topographical characteristics and type of decay of the stone surface, and the quantity of material lost from the surface of the panels during the year. As discussed in this paper, in the context of cultural heritage, the proposed methodology was validated and its results can be considered an improvement on and complementary to expert visual analysis and also to other nondestructive techniques.

nondestructive experimental covariance experimental granulonetry grey-tone functions texture image analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Amoroso, G., and Fassina, V., 1983, Stone decay and conservation,Vol. 1; Materials science monograph, 11: Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 453 p.Google Scholar
  2. Benali, M., 1986, Du choix des mesures dans les procedures de reconaissance des formes et d' analyse de textures: Thèse Doctorat en Morphologie Mathématique, Fontainebleau, France, 191 p.Google Scholar
  3. Castelman, K., 1996, Digital image processing: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 667 p.Google Scholar
  4. Chao, T. H., 1997, Optical implementation of mathematical morphology, in Yu, F. T. S., and Lutaumlia, S., eds., Optical pattern recognition: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 126–140.Google Scholar
  5. Coster, M., and Chermant, J. L., 1985, Précis d'analyse d'images: Èditions du CNRS, Paris, France, 521 p.Google Scholar
  6. Figueiredo, C., Maurício, A., and Aires-Barros, L., 1997a, Structural texture analysis of carbonate rock weathered surfaces: A mathematical morphology approach (granulometry and covariance for grey-tone functions), in Arańjo, H., and Vieirode Sá, L., eds., 4th Conference on Pattern Recognition: Departamento de Engenharia Electrotécnica da Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, p. 145–152.Google Scholar
  7. Figueiredo, C., Maurício, A., and Aires-Barros, L., 1997b, Mathematical morphology-based image analysis and monument rock decay assessment: Case studies, in Stefanazzi, M., and Hocquette, R., eds., 8es Journées d' Ètudes de la SFIIC Informatique & Conservation-Restauration du Patrimoine Culturel: Chalon-sur-Saõne, France, p. 261–271.Google Scholar
  8. Fitzner, B., Heinrichs, K., and Kownatzki, R., 1992, Classification and mapping of weathering forms, in Delgado Rodrigues, I., Henriques, F., and Telruo Jeremias, F., eds., Proceedings of the 7th Intl. Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone: Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisboa, Portugal, p. 957–968.Google Scholar
  9. Fitzner, B., Heinrichs, K., and Volker, M., 1996, Monument mapping—A contribution to monument preservation, in Zezza, F., ed., Proceedings on ‘Origin, Mechanisms and Effects of Salts on Degradation of Monuments in Marine and Continental Environments, Protection and Conservation of the European Cultural Heritage’: Research Report No. 4, Ed. Zezza, Bari, Italy, p. 347–355.Google Scholar
  10. González, M. A. V., 1996, Analisis de imagen como metodologia de trabajo en la conservatión de obras monumentales: unpubl. doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 274 p.Google Scholar
  11. González, R. C., and Woods, R. E., 1997, Digital image processing: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York, 716 p.Google Scholar
  12. Haas, A., Matheron, G., and Serra, J., 1967, Morphologie mathématique et granulométrie en place: Ann. des Mines, XI, p. 736–753 and XII, p. 767-782.Google Scholar
  13. Heijmans, H. J. A. M., 1994, Morphological image operators: Academic Press, Boston, 509 p.Google Scholar
  14. Jeulin, D., 1987, Mathematical morphology and materials image analysis, 6th Pfefferkorn Conference, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada, 28 p.Google Scholar
  15. Matheron, G., 1975, Random sets and integral geometry: Wiley & Sons, New York, 261 p.Google Scholar
  16. Maurício, A., Figueiredo, C., and Aires-Barros, L., 1997, Mathemetical morphology, image analysis and quantification of rock decayed surfaces, in Moropoulou, A., Zezza, F., Kollias, E., and Papacristodoulou, I., eds., Proceed. 4th Intl. Symp. on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean, Vol. 2: Rhodes, Greece, p. 309–324.Google Scholar
  17. Montoto, M., Valdeon, L., Cõtes, P., Calleja, L., Corral, N., Lopez, T., Sanchez, B., and Esbert, R. M., 1994, Non-destructive characterization of the state of deterioration of megaliths by ultrasonic tomography: A petrophysical interpretation, in Fassina, V., Ott, H., and Zezza, F., eds., in Proceed. 3rd Intl. Symp. on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin, Venice: Soprintendenza ai Beni Artistici e Storico di Venezia, Italy, p. 3–9.Google Scholar
  18. Müller, V., Althaus, E., Karotke, E., 1997, Damage-mapping of historical buildings: Realisation and computer aided evaluation, in Stefanaggi, M., and Hocquette, R., eds., 8es Journées d' Ètudes de la SFIIC ‘Informatique & Conservation-Restauration du Patrimoine Culturel’: Chalon-sur-Saõne, France, p. 167–170.Google Scholar
  19. Nappi, A., and Cõte, P., 1997, Non-destructive test methods applicable to historic stone structures, in Baer, N. S., and Snetlage, R., eds., Saving our architectural heritage (the conservation of historic stone structures): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK, p. 151–166.Google Scholar
  20. O' Brien, P., 1990, Visual assessment methodology: Preliminary report on the development of a visual assessment methodology as applied to Regent House Trinity College: Dublin, Ireland, 27 p.Google Scholar
  21. Rautureau, M., Cooke, R. U., and Boyde, A., 1993, The application of confocal microscopy to the study of stone weathering: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, v. 18, London, UK, p. 769–775.Google Scholar
  22. Rautureau, M., Harba, R., Jacquet, G., 1992, Image segmentation applied to scanning electron microscopy multi-images of weathered stones of monumets: Scanning Microscopy International, Chicago, p. 293–298.Google Scholar
  23. Serra, J., 1976, Lectures on image analysis by mathematical morphology: No. 475, Fontainebleau, France, 225 p.Google Scholar
  24. Serra, J., 1982, Image analysis and mathematical morphology: Academic Press, London, 610 p.Google Scholar
  25. Serra, J. 1988, Image analysis and mathematical morphology, Vol. 2, Theoretical advances: Academic Press, S. Diego, 411 p.Google Scholar
  26. Tomita, F., and Tsuji, S., 1990, Computer analysis of visual textures: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London, UK, 173 p.Google Scholar
  27. Zezza, F., 1989, Computerized analysis of stone decay in monuments, in Zezza, F., ed., Proceedings of the 1st Intl. Symp. for the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin: Bari, Italy, p. 163–184.Google Scholar
  28. Zezza, F., 1991, Digital image processing of weathered stone in polluted atmosphere, in Adda (Bari), M., ed., Proceeding of 1st Course ‘Weathering and Air Pollution’: CUM University School for Monument Conservation, Portese Sul Garda—Venice—Milan, Italy, p. 217–228.Google Scholar
  29. Zezza, F., 1993, Evaluation criteria of the effectiveness of treatments by non-destructive analysis, in Adda (Bari), M., ed., Proceed. of the 2nd Course "stone Material in Monuments: diagnosis and conservation’: University School for Monument Conservation, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, p. 198–207.Google Scholar
  30. Zezza, F., 1995, Stone decay diagnosis and control of treatments by computerised analytical techniques, in Edizione (Brescia), G., ed., 3rd Intl. Symp. on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin: Venezia, Italy, p. 77–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • António Maurício
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carlos Figueiredo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mining Engineering and Earth Resources, Laboratório de Mineralogia e PetrologiaInstituto Superior, TécnicoLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Lisboa CodexPortugal

Personalised recommendations