European Journal of Epidemiology

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 181–188 | Cite as

The diuretic effects of alcohol and caffeine and total water intake misclassification

  • J.D. Stookey
Article

Abstract

Data from the 1994 USDA nationwide survey (CSFII) on 190 non- smoking males (aged 20–29) were used to propose a method for adjusting total water intake for the diuretic effects of caffeine and alcohol, and evaluate the potential for related misclassification bias. The data were processed on a per meal basis. Under the assumption that subjects were in water balance at the start of the survey day, water losses due to caffeine (1.17 ml/mg caffeine) and alcohol (10ml/g alcohol) were subtracted from crude intake estimates. If water intake for one meal was inadequate for excretion of the associated osmotic load at 750 mosmol/l, water losses for the subsequent meal were reduced by 32%. Unadjusted and adjusted mean total water intakes differed by 321.5g. Misclassification appeared worst at higher water intakes. Linear regression models, each with a water intake variable as an independent variable and body mass index as the outcome, were fit to evaluate the potential for alcohol- and caffeine-related misclassification bias. Misclassification resulted in large changes (all >10%) in linear regression estimates of effect. Future studies of water–disease relationships, especially those intending to compare extremes of total water intake, should consider caffeine- and alcohol-related misclassification bias.

Alcohol Caffeine Misclassification bias Water 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shannon J, White E, Shattuck AL, Potter JD. Relationship of food groups and water intake to colon cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996; 5: 495–502.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lubin F, Rozen P, Arieli B, Farbstein M, Knaani Y, Bat L, Farbstein H. Nutrition and lifestyle habits and water-fiber interaction in colorectal adenoma etiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997; 6: 79–85.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stookey JD, Belderson PE, Russell JM, Barker ME. Letteer to the Editor. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997; 6: 657–658.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McManus ML, Churchwell KB. Clinical significance of cellular osmoregulation. In: Strange K (ed), Cellular and molecular physiology of cell volume regulation. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1994: 63–77.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friis-Hansen B. Water the major nutrient. Acta Paediatr Scand 1982; Suppl. 299: 11–16.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Research Council. Recommended dietary allowances, 10th ed. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1989: 249.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stumbo PJ, Booth BM, Eichenberger JM, Duskieker LB. Water intakes of lactating women. Am J Clin Nutr 1985; 42: 870–876.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greden JF. Coffee, tea, and you. Sciences (New York) 1979; 19: 6–11.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Life Sciences Research Office. Prepared for the Interagency Board for Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research. Third Report on Nutrition Monitoring in the United States, Vol. 2. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neuhauser-Berthold M, Beine S, Verwied SC, Luhrmann PM. Coffee consumption and total body water homeostasis as measured by fluid balance and bioelectrical impedance analysis. Ann Nutr Metab 1997; 41: 21–36.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eggleton MG. The diuretic action of alcohol in man. J Physiol 1942; 101: 172–191.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Agricultural Research Service. USDA Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. In USDA Nutrient Data Laboratory 1997; [Online]: http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/cgi-bin/nut_search.pl, Release 11–1 (August 1997).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taivainen H, Laitinen R, Tahtela R, Kiianmaa K, Valimaki MJ. Role of plasma vasopressin in changes of water balance accompanying acute alcohol intoxication. Alcoholism: Clin Exper Res 1995; 19:(3) 759–762.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eddy NB, Downs AW. Tolerance and cross-tolerance in the human subject to the diuretic effect of caffeine, theobromine and theophylline. J Pharmacol Exper Therapy, 1928; 33: 167–174.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.D. Stookey
    • 1
  1. 1.Nutrition Department, School of Public HealthUniversity of Chapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations