Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing Censored Spatial Data

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial data that are incomplete because of observations arising below or above a detection limit occur in many settings, for example, in mining, hydrology, and pollution monitoring. These observations are referred to as censored observations. For example, in a life test, censoring may occur at random times because of accident or breakdown of equipment. Also, censoring may occur when failures are discovered only at periodic inspections. Because the informational content of censored observations is less than that of uncensored ones, censored data create difficulties in an analysis, particularly when such data are spatially dependent. Traditional methodology applicable for uncensored data needs to be adapted to deal with censorship. In this paper we propose an adaptation of the traditional methodology using the so-called Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. This approach permits estimation of the drift coefficients of a spatial linear model when censoring is present. As a by-product, predictions of unobservable values of the response variable are possible. Some aspects of the spatial structure of the data related to the implicit correlation also are discussed. We illustrate the results with an example on uranium concentrations at various depths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aitkin, M., 1981, A note on the regression analysis of censored data: Technometrics, v. 23, no. 2, p. 161–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J., and James, I. R., 1979, Linear regression with censored data: Biometrika, v. 66, no. 3, p. 429–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B., 1977, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion): J. R. Statist. Soc. B, v. 39, no. 1, p. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. L., and Meier, P., 1958, Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations: J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., v. 53, no. 282, p. 457–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koul, H., Susarla, V., and Van Ryzin, J., 1981, Regression analysis with randomly right censored data: Ann. Statist., v. 9, no. 4, p. 1276–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Militino, A. F., 1997, M-estimator of the drift coefficients in a spatial linear model: Math. Geology, v. 29, no. 2, p. 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Militino, A. F., and Ugarte, M. D., 1997, A GM estimation of the location parameters in a spatial linear model: Commun. Statist. Theory and Meth., v. 26, no. 7, p. 1701–1725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, A. N., 1986, Censored observations, repeated measures and mixed effects models: An approach using the EM algorithm and normal errors: Biometrika, v. 73, no. 3, p. 635–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. G., 1976, Least squares regression with censored data: Biometrika, v. 63, no. 2, p. 449–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. D., 1981, Spatial statistics: Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, New York, 252 p.

  • Schmee, J., and Hahn, G. J., 1979, A simple method for regression analysis with censored data (with discussion): Technometrics, v. 21, no. 4, p. 417–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. L., 1992, Prediction and inference for truncated spatial data: Jour. Comput. Graphical Statist., v. 1, no. 1, p. 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsiatis, A. A. (1990). Estimating regression parameters using linear regression rank test for censored data: Ann. Statist., v. 18, no. 1, p. 354–372.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Militino, A.F., Ugarte, M.D. Analyzing Censored Spatial Data. Mathematical Geology 31, 551–561 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007516023962

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007516023962

Navigation