Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 33–46 | Cite as

Ecology of the coporo, Prochilodus mariae (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae), and status of annual migrations in western Venezuela

  • Aniello Barbarino Duque
  • Donald C. Taphorn
  • Kirk O. Winemiller

Abstract

Deforestation, overfishing, pollution, and construction of dams have severely impacted migratory fishes of western Venezuela. The coporo, Prochilodus mariae (Prochilodontidae), has supported the largest commercial fishery among the species that have seasonal long-distance migrations between rivers of the Andean piedmont and the llanos floodplains. During the period July 1988 to November 1990, coporo ecology was studied in the Río Boconó and the Boconó-Tucupido reservoir in estado Portuguesa. Coporo females mature at age 2 at 23 cm SL. Relatively few coporos were captured from the reservoir and the R. Boconó upstream. No coporos were encountered in the river > 3 km upstream from the reservoir nor in hypoxic regions of the reservoir > 4 m deep. In the river segment immediately downstream (0–4 km) from the Boconó Dam, the stock was comprised of mostly juveniles (78% < 17 cm SL), and this size/age structure was relatively stable over time. In recent years, overfishing downstream from the dam has reduced the densities and sizes of coporos in the R. Boconó. The river segment 4–16 km below the dam was comprised of 78% adults. Few coporos > 3 yr and > 30 cm SL were found in the rivers, whereas none were < 4 yr and < 30 cm in the reservoir. Detritus was consumed more than algae by coporos in the reservoir and by adults relative to juveniles among river-dwelling fish. In both reservoir and river fish, gonadal development was initiated during late November and peaked during May-June. We found no evidence of successful reproduction in the reservoir, and mature adults in the lower river segment disappeared during June, presumably having migrated to the floodplains of the low llanos for spawning. From mid-November 1989 until March 1990, coporo ‘ribazóns’ (schools of ascending migrants) of diminishing densities were surveyed from the R. Apure upstream to the R. Boconó. ‘ribazóns’ have been eliminated or greatly diminished in nearly 80% of the principal rivers of the Andean piedmont in western Venezuela. Management options to assist this economically and ecologically important species are discussed.

algivory dam detritivory floodplain population structure reservoir river 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Agostinho, A.A., A.E.A. de M. Vazzoler, L.C. Gomes & E.K. Okada. 1993. Estratificación espacial y comportamiento de Prochilodus scrofa en distintas fases del ciclo de vida, en las planicie de inundación del alto río Paraná y embalse de Itaipu, Paraná, Brasil. Rev. Hydrobiol. Trop. 26: 79–90.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, E., L. Balbas, I. Massa & J. Pacheco. 1986. Apectos ecologicos del embalse Guri. Interciencia 11: 325–333.Google Scholar
  3. Barthem, R.B., M.C.L.B. Ribeiro & M. Petrer, Jr. 1991. Life strategies of some long-distance migratory catfish in relation to hydroelectric dams in the Amazon basin. Biol. Conserv. 55: 339–345.Google Scholar
  4. Bayley, P.B. 1973. Studies on the migratory characin Prochilodus platensis Holmberg, 1889 (Pisces, Characoidei) in the river Pilcomayo, South America. J. Fish. Biol. 5: 25–40.Google Scholar
  5. Bayley, P.B. & M. Petrere, Jr. 1989. Amazon fisheries: assessment of methods, status and management options. pp. 385–398. In: D.P. Dodge (ed.) Proceedings of the International Large Rivers Symposiu. Can. Spec. Pub. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 106, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  6. Bonetto, A.A., M. Canon Cerón & D. Roldán. 1981. Nuevos aportes al conocimiento de las migraciones de peces en el río Paraná. Ecosur. 8: 29–40.Google Scholar
  7. Bowen, S.H. 1983. Detritivory in neotropical fish communities. Env. Biol. Fish. 9: 137–144.Google Scholar
  8. Bowen, S.H., A.A. Bonetto & M.O. Ahlgren. 1984. Microorganisms and detritus in the diet of a typical neotropical riverine detritivore, AProchilodus platensis (Pisces: Prochilodontidae). Limnol. Oceanogr. 29: 1120–1122.Google Scholar
  9. Chapman, M. 1980. Desarrollo estable de la pesca en la región del Guanare-Masparro. CIDIAT, Mérida. 55 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, G., F. Medem & A. Ramos. 1963. El ‘bocachico’, contribución al estudio de su biologia y de su ambiente, Depto. Pesca Corp. Auto. Reg. Valles Magdalena y Sinú, Bogotá. 144 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Fearnside, P.M. 1989, Brazil's Balbina Dam: environment versus the legacy of the pharaohs in Amazonia. Env. Manag. 13: 401–423.Google Scholar
  12. Flecker, A.S. 1992. Fish trophic guilds and the organization of a neotropical stream: weak direct versus strong indirect effects. Ecology 73: 927–940.Google Scholar
  13. Flecker, A.S. 1996. Ecosystem engineering by a dominant detritivore in a diverse tropical stream. Ecology 77: 1845–1854.Google Scholar
  14. Godoy, M.P. de. 1959. Age, growth, sexual maturity, behaviour, migration, tagging and transplantation of the curimbata (Prochilodus scrofa Steindachner, 1881) of the Mogi Guassu River, Sao Paulo State, Brasil. An. Acad. Brasiliera Cienc. 31: 447–477.Google Scholar
  15. Goulding, M. 1980. The fishes and the forest. University California Press, Berkeley. 280 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Goulding, M. 1988. Ecology and management of migratory food fishes of the Amazon basin. pp. 71–85. In: F. Almeda & C.M. Pringie (ed.) Tropical Rainforests: Diversity and Conservation, California Academy of Sciences & Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  17. Jepsen, D.B., K.O. Winemiller & D.C. Taphorn. 1997. Temporal patterns of resource partitioning among Cichla species in a Venezuelan black-water river. J. Fish Biol. 51: 1085–1108.Google Scholar
  18. LeCren, E.D. 1951. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in godad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis), J. Anim. Ecol. 20: 201–219.Google Scholar
  19. Lilyestrom, C.G. 1983. Aspectos de la biología del coporo (Prochilodus mariae). Rev. Ciencia Tecnol. UNELLEZ (Barinas) 1: 5–11.Google Scholar
  20. Lilyestrom, C.G. & D.C. Taphorn. 1978. El coporo (Prochilodus mariae), una especie en peligro? Mem. Soc. Cienc. Nat. La Salle (Caracas) 38: 311–318.Google Scholar
  21. Loubens, G. & J. Panfili. 1995. Biologie de Prochilodus nigricans (Teleostei: Prochilodontidae) dans le bassin du Mamoré (Amazonic bolivienne). Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters 6: 17–32.Google Scholar
  22. Novoa, D.F. 1989. The multispecies fisheries of the Orinoco River: development present status, and management strategies. pp. 422–428. In: D.P. Dodge (ed.) Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium, Can. Spec. Pub. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 106, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  23. Quirós, R. 1989. Structures assisting the migrations of non-salmonid fish: Latin America. COPESCAL Tech. Pap. (FAO, Rome) 5: 1–41.Google Scholar
  24. Ribeiro, M.C.L. de B. 1983. As migrçõcs dos jaraquis (Pisces, Prochilodontidae) no rio Negro, Amazonas, Brasil. Master's Thesis. Inst. Nac. Pesq. Amaz./Univ. Amazonas, Manaus. 192 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Saldaña, J. & B. Venables. 1983. Energy compartmentalization in a migratory fish, Prochilodus mariae (Prochilodontidae), of the Orinoco River. Copeia 1983: 617–623.Google Scholar
  26. Vazzoler, A.E. de M. & S.A. Amadio. 1990. Aspectos biológicos de peixes Amazônicos. XIII. Estrutura e comportamento de cardumes multiespecfícos de Semaprochilodus (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae) no baixo Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brasil. Rev. Brasiliera Biol. 50: 537–546.Google Scholar
  27. Vazzoler, A.E. de M., S.A. Amadio & M.C. Daraciolo-Malta. 1989. Aspectos biológicos de peixes Amazônicos. XI. reproducão das espécies do gênero Semaprochilodus (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae) no baixo Rio Negro, Amazonas. Brasil. Rev. Brasiliera Biol. 49: 165–173.Google Scholar
  28. Welcomme, R.L. 1990. Status of fisheries in South American rivers. Interciencia 15: 337–345.Google Scholar
  29. Winemiller, K.O. 1996. Factors driving spatial and temporal variation in aquatic floodplain food webs. pp. 298–312. In: G.A. Polis & K.O. Winemiller (ed.) Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics, Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Winemiller, K.O., C. Marrero & D.C. Taphorn. 1996. Perturbaciones causadas por el hombre a las problaciones de peces de los llanos y del piedemonte Andino de Venezuela. Biollania (Venezuela) 12: 13–48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aniello Barbarino Duque
    • 1
  • Donald C. Taphorn
    • 1
  • Kirk O. Winemiller
    • 2
  1. 1.Programa Postgrado en Recursos Naturales Renovables, UNELLEZ, GuanareEstado PortuguesaVenezuela
  2. 2.Department of Wildlife Fisheries SciencesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationU.S.A.
  3. 3.FONAIAP, Estación Experimental de Apure, Carretera Perimetral, San Fernando de ApureEstado ApureVenezuela

Personalised recommendations