Advertisement

Neohelicon

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 31–40 | Cite as

Theory in Literature

  • Svend Erik Larsen
Article
  • 72 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bakhtin, Mihail (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barrault, Jean-Louis (1994). Mise en scène de Phèdre de Racine. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  3. Brunel, Pierre (ed.) (1988). Dictionnaire des mythes littéraires. Paris: Rocher.Google Scholar
  4. Elias, Norbert (1997). Über der Prozeβ der Zivilisation, 1–2. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  5. Fowler, Alastair (1982). Kinds of Literature. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  6. Hunger, Herbert (1959). Lexikon der griechischen und römischen Mythologie. Wien: Brüder Hollinek.Google Scholar
  7. James, Henry (1962 [1934]). The Art of the Novel. New York: Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Racine, Jean (1960 [1677]). Phèdre. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  9. Schlegel, August Wilhelm von (1972 [1808/1846]). Comparison entre la Phèdre de Racine et celle d'Euripide. Sämtliche Schriften XIV. Hildesheim: Olms, 333–405.Google Scholar
  10. Schütz, Alfred (1955). Symbol, Reality, and Society. Symbol and Reality, Lyman Bryson e.a., eds. New York: Praeger, 135–203.Google Scholar
  11. Truchet, Jacques (1997 [1975]). La tragédie classique en France. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Svend Erik Larsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Comparative LiteratureUniversity of AarhusAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations