Mycopathologia

, Volume 148, Issue 3, pp 141–147 | Cite as

Capnodium citri: The sooty mold fungi comprising the taxon concept

  • Don R. Reynolds
Article

Abstract

The common use of the name Capnodium citri to represent several species of sooty mold fungi is reviewed. Analysis of sooty mold specimens from Citrus in Florida found the species Antennariella californica and Chaetobolisia falcata with spherical fruitbodies and Caldariomyces fumago and Polychaeton citri with elongate fruitbodies. It is recommended that use of the name Capnodium citri for sooty mold on Citrus and ornamental plants is to be avoided because of its use for a number of species and on nomenclatural grounds.

ascomycetes Citrus Capnodium sooty mold 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berkeley MJ, Desmazières JBHJ. On some moulds referred by authors to Fumago, and on certain allied or analogous forms. J Hort Soc London 1849; 4: 244–260.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reynolds DR. Capnodium salicinum Montagne emend. Mycotaxon 1978; 7: 501–506.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fisher E. The sooty moulds of some Australian plants. Proc Roy Soc Victoria 1933; 45: 171–202.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fraser L. An investigation of sooty moulds of New South Wales. I. Historical and introductory account. Proc Linn Soc NSW 1933; 58: 375–395.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McAlpine D. The sooty mould of citrus trees: a study in polymorphism. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 1896. 21: 469–499.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wescott C. Plant disease handbook. 3rd ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wellman FL. Tropical American plant disease. Neotropical phytology problems. Metuchen, New Jersey: The Scarecrow Press, Inc., 1972.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whiteside J, Garnsey S, Timmer L. Compendium of citrus diseases. St. Paul, Minnesota: APS Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saccardo PA. Sylloge Fungorum. Pavatii,1822: Volume 1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Bary A. Comparative morphology and biology of the fungi, mycetozoa and bacteria. English translation by H.C.F. Garnsey, revised by J.B. Balfour. London: Frowde, 1887.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Persoon CH. Mycologia europea. Sectio prima. Erlangae: 1822.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Webber HJ. Sooty mold of the orange and its treatment. USDA Div Veg Physiol Pathol Bulletin 13. 1897.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Butler DJ. Fungi and disease in plants. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink, 1918.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fawcet HS, Lee HA. Citrus diseases and their control. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1925.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gaumann EA. Comparative morphology of fungi. English translation and revision by C.W. Dodge. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1928.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stevenson JA. An account of fungi exsiccati containing material from the America. Nov Hed Weih 1971; 36: 1–563.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pfister DH. A bibliographic account of exsiccatae containing fungi. Mycotaxon 1985; 23: 1–139.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holgren PK. Holmgren NH, Barnett LC (eds). Index herbariorum. Part I: The herbaria of the world. 8th edition. Bronx, New York: New York Botanical Garden, 1990.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farlow WG. On a disease of olive and orange trees occurring in California in the spring and summer of 1875. Bul Bussey Inst Bot Agr 1876; I: 404.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Underwood LM. Diseases of the orange in Florida. J Mycol 1891; 7: 27–36.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seymour AB. Host Index of the Fungi of North America. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1929.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Everitt JH, Escoba DE, Summy KR, Davis MR. Using airborne video, global positioning system, and geographical information-system technologies for detecting and mapping citrus blackfly infestations. Southwestern Entomol. 1994: 19: 129–138.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hubbard HG. Insects affecting the orange. Washington, D. C.: USDA Department of Agriculture, Division of Entomology, 1885.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stevens FL. The fungi which cause plant disease. New York: Macmillan, 1913.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heald FD, Wolf FA. A plant-disease survey in the vicinity of San Antonio, Texas. Washington, D.C.: USDA Bur Plant Ind Bul, 1912.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anon. Index of Plant Diseases in the United States. Washington, D.C.: USA Handbook No 165, 1960.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fawcet H S. Citrus diseases and their control. 2nd ed. New York.: McGraw-Hill, 1936.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hepting GH. Diseases of forest and shade trees of the United States. Agriculture Handbook 386. Washington, D.C.: USDA Forest Service, 1971.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Batista AC, Ciferri R. The sooty-molds of the family Asbolisiaceae. Quaderno 1963. 31: 1–229.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Batista AC, Ciferri R. 1963a. Capnodiales. Saccardoa 2: 1298.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dingley JM, Fullerton RA, McKenzie EHC. Survey of agricultural pests and diseases. Records of fungi, bacteria, algae and angiosperms pathogenic on plants in Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, Niue, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Western Samoa. New Zealand DSIR Tech. Report 2. Rome: United Nations FAO, 1981.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ellis JB, Everhart BM. The North American pyrenomycetes. Newfield, New Jersey: Private printing, 1892.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sawada K. Descriptive catalog of Taiwan (Formosan) fungi. Part XI. Coll Agri Natl Taiwan Univ Spec Publ 1959; 8: 1–268, 12 pls.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stevenson JA. The fungi of Puerto Rico and the American Virgin Islands. Contribution of Reed Herbarium No. XXIII, 1975.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tulasne LR, Tulasne C. Selecta fungorum carpologia. (Translated into English by W.B. Grove). Volume 3, 1863.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Teodoro NG. Enumeration of Philippine fungi. Manila: Bur Pl Indust, 1937.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Viegas AP. Alguns fungos do Brasil. II. Bragantia 1944: 4: 1–392.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yamamoto W. Formosan sooty mould fungi belonging to the Meliolaceae, Parodiellinaceae, Asterinaceae and Capnodiaceae. Mem Coll Agri Natl Taiwan Univ Spec Publ 1961: 10: 197–264.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Farr DF, Bills GF, Chamuris GP, Rossman AY. Fungi on plants and plant products in the United States. St. Paul, Minnesota: APS Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ivbijaro MFN, Udensis UM, Ukwela Annonyako FV. Geographical distribution and host range in Nigeria of the mango mealy bug, Rastrococcus invadens Williams, a serious exotic pest of horticulture and other crops. Insect Sci Appl 1992;13: 411–416.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Parris GK. A revised host index of Mississippi plant diseases. Mississippi State University. Bot Dept Misc Publ 1959; 1: 1–146.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sparks D, Yates IE. Pecan cultivar susceptibility to sooty mold related to leaf surface morphology. J Amer Soc Hort Sc. 1991; 116: 6–9.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tedders WL, Smith JS. Shading effect on pecan by sooty mold growth. J Econ Entomol 1976; 69: 551–553.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wood BW, Tedders WL, Reilly CC. Sooty mold fungus on pecan foliage suppresses light penetration and net photosynthesis. Hort Sci 1988; 23: 851–853.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Reynolds DR, Pohlad BR. Cyclic patterns of central Florida sooty molds. Proc Iowa Acad Sci.1974; 81: 12–13.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pohlad BR. Cyclic patterns of central Florida sooty molds. MS thesis (unpublished). Orlando, Florida: Florida Tech. University, Orlando, Florida, 1975.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Miller VM, Bonar L. A study of the Perisporiaceae, Capnodiaceae, and some other sooty molds from California. Univ Calif Publ Bot 1941; 19: 405–428.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kunze O. Revisio Generum Plantarum. Leipzig: A. Felix, 1891.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Woronochin NN. Zur Kenntnis der Morphologie u. Systematik der ruβtaupilze transkaukasiens. Annal Mycol 1926; 24: 231–264.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    von Höhen F. Fragemente zur Mykologie III. No. 128. Wettsteinina n. g. Stizb Akad Wiss Wien 1907;116: 126–129.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Miller JH. Studies in the development of two Myriangium species and the systematic position of the Myriangiales. Mycologia 1938; 30: 158–181.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Luttrell ES. Taxonomy of the Pyrenomycetes. Univ Missouri Studies 25, 1951.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Luttrell ES. The ascostromatic ascomycetes. Mycologia 1955; 47: 511–532.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Luttrell ES. Loculoascomycetes. in: Ainsworth GC, Sparrow FK, Sussman AS, eds, The fungi, an advanced treatise. Vol. 4A. New York: Academic Press, 1973: 135–219.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Reynolds DR. Ascomycete systematics: The Luttrellian Concept. New York: Springer-Verlag. 1981.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Roquebert MF, Bury R. Leptoxyphium: Pycnide ou synnéma? Can J Bot 1988; 66: 2265–2272.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Reynolds DR. The capnodiaceous genus Scorias, reproduction. Natl Hist Museum LA Cty Contrib Sci 1978; 288: 1–16.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kingma PH, van Beyna T. Untersuchungen über russtau. K. Akademie van wetenschappen, Amsterdam. Afdeeling naturk Verhand, tweede sect 1931; 39: 3–29.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hughes SJ Sooty Moulds. Mycologia 1976; 68: 693–820.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Greuter W (ed). International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Tokyo Code). Regnum Vegetabile Volume 131. Königstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books, 1994.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rose E. Contributionà l'étude de la fumagine, appelée aussi morfée maladie du noir. Bull Soc Bot France 1868. 14: 15–23.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Léveillé JH. Mycologie, Mycétologie: In d'Orbigny A, Dictionnaire univ d'Hist nat 1847, 8: 454–496.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Poiteau A, Turpin PJF Flore parisienne, contenant la description des plantes, que croissent naturellement aux environs de Paris. Ann Soc hortic de Paris 1833.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sutton BC. The Coelomycetes, fungi imperfecti with pycnidia, acervuli and stromata. Kew, Surrey, England: Commonwealth Mycological Institute, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Don R. Reynolds
    • 1
  1. 1.Research and CollectionsNatural History Museum of Los Angeles CountyLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations