Advertisement

Neohelicon

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 119–126 | Cite as

Stoppard's Theories

  • Péter P. Müller
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Culler, Jonathan (1982). On Deconstruction. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  2. Delaney, Paul (1990). Tom Stoppard. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Egri, Péter (1996). Modern Games with Renaissance Forms. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  4. Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1984). Igazság és módszer [Truth and Method.] Budapest: Gondolat.Google Scholar
  5. Kálmán, György C. (1998). “Elméletalkotói közösségek.” [“Communities creating theories.”] Irodalom, nyelv, kultúra [Literature, language, culture.] Pécs: Jelenkor.Google Scholar
  6. Kelly, Katherine E. (1991). Tom Stoppard and the Craft of Comedy. Ann Arbor: The Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  7. Rorty, Richard (1991). Essays on Heidegger and Others. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  8. Rusinko, Susan (1989). British Drama. 1950 to the Present. Boston: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Singh, Simon (1997). Fermat's Enigma. New York: Walker and Company.Google Scholar
  10. Stoppard, Tom (1993). Arcadia. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  11. Stoppard, Tom (1979). Jumpers. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  12. Stoppard, Tom (1996). Plays 1. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  13. Stoppard, Tom (1981). Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. In: Nine Plays of the Modern Theater. Ed. Harold Clurman. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Péter P. Müller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Literary Theory and Modern LiteratureJanus Pannonius UniversityPécsHungary

Personalised recommendations