Abstract
The North American Eastern Seaboard is one of the major container handling regions of the world. However, since 1975 it has declined relative to the world development of containerisation. Whereas in 1975, 20.4% of the world's containers passed through Eastern Seaboard ports, in 1995 the figure was 7.2%. In the period 1975 to 1995, ports in Canada and the Mid Atlantic range have held their own relatively in the proportion of containers handled in the Eastern Seaboard. Ports in the North East, primarily New York, have lost ground; ports in the South have gained. Rank size analysis and the Gini coefficient show a deconcentration of container handling away from New York to middle ranked ports, especially Hampton Roads, Charleston, SC and Montreal. Global factors – universal adoption of containerisation, changing trade routes brought about by post-Panamax ships and intermodality, and cargo sharing among alliances – explain the relative decline of the Eastern Seaboard ports as a group. Individual port development is largely accounted for by how well ports respond to the global factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagli C., 1999: As host states feud, 2 major lines agree to stay in New York harbor. New York Times, p. A15, 8 May 1999.
Containerisation International Yearbook (various years): National Magazine Company, London.
Hayuth Y., 1987: Intermodality: Concept and Practice. Lloyds of London Press, Essex.
Hayuth Y., 1988: Rationalization and deconcentration of the US container port system. The Professional Geographer 40: 279-288.
Ircha M.C. & Wilson F.R., 1998: Canadian port reform: An evolutionary process, paper presented at World Conference on Transportation Research, Antwerp.
Kuby M. & Reid N., 1992: Technological change and the concentration of the US general cargo port system: 1970–1988. Economic Geography 68: 272-289.
McCalla R., 1994: Water Transportation in Canada. Formac, Halifax.
Muller G., 1995: Intermodal Freight Transportation. VA: Eno Transportation Foundation, Landsdowne.
Shashikumar N., 1998: Container port dilemma on the US East Coast: An analysis of causes and consequences, paper presented at World Conference on Transportation Research, Antwerp.
Slack B., 1998: Intermodal transportation. In: Hoyle B. and Knowles R. (eds), Modern Transport Geography. John Wiley, Chichester, pp. 263-289.
Van den Burg G., 1975: Containerisation. Hutchinson Benham, London.
Internet References
Port of Baltimore: Easy access via truck and rail. Online. Internet. 22 April 1998. available at http://199.34.33.102/locate.htm
Port of Charleston: Terminal facts for: Columbus Street Terminal, Wando Welsh Terminal and North Charleston Terminal. Online. Internet. 6 May 1998(a). available at http://web.infoave.net/scspa/21e6.htm, http://web.infoave.net/scspa/21ea.htm and http://web.infoave.net/scspa/21ee.htm
Port of Charleston: Harbor and Terminals. Online. Internet. 6 May 1998(b). available at http://web.infoave.net.scspa/21aa.htm
Port Everglades: Port acquires land for expanded port development, Nov. 1997. Online. Internet. 23 April 1998. available at http://www.co.broward.fl.us/port
Port of Miami: Cargo. Online. Internet. 22 April 1998. available at http://www.metro-dade.com/portofmiami/cargo1.htm
Port of Montreal: Port of Montreal, a leader on the NorthAtlantic. Online. Internet. 22 April 1998. available at http://www.port-montreal.com/english/numfr.htm
Port of New York/New Jersey: Port authority moves to capture coming trade surge, 31 July 1997. Online. Internet. available at http://www.panynj.gov/pr/prframe.htm
Port of Savannah: Containerport at Garden City Terminal. Online. Internet. 22 April 1998. available at http://www.gaports.com/ptsavannah.htm
Sea-Land: Maersk and Sea-Land select Northeast deepwater port. Online. Internet. 23 June 1999. Available at http://www.sealand.com/docs/press050799-161324.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCalla, R.J. From St. John's to Miami: Containerisation at Eastern Seaboard Ports. GeoJournal 48, 21–28 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007084618624
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007084618624