Skip to main content
Log in

Nature and the Singapore resident

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Singapore has witnessed rapid urban development in the last thirty years. Its landscape has changed from one of slums and squatters in the immediate post-war years to a city of gardens and high-rise high-density housing. The concept of a `garden city' was introduced to guide the development of a city-state with abundant greenery. In the process, many parks and gardens were created including park connectors which are green linkages between parks and other land uses. This paper presents the findings of an ongoing research into park connectors. It reports on that part of the survey results which examine the views of residents towards nature provision in park connectors and suggest some design options to enhance the planning of park connectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews J., 1993: The reality and management of wildlife corridors. British Wildlife 5(1): 1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker G., 1995: City wildlife: Different, difficult and dangerous. Enact: Managing Land for Wildlife 3(4): 7-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briffett C., Kong L., Yuen B. and Sodhi N., 1997: The Planning and Ecology of Park Connector Systems in Urban Areas. National University of Singapore, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess J., Harrison C. and Limb M., 1988: People, parks and the urban green: A study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Studies 25: 455-473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J. M., 1974: Relaxation and differential extinction on land bridge islands: Applications to natural preserves. Proceedings of 16th International Ornithological Congress.

  • Dower M., 1963: Greenways: A positive future for Britain's cast-off railways. Architectural Review: 387-393.

  • Harrison C., Limb M. and Burgess J., 1987: Nature in the city: Popular values for a living world. Journal of Environmental Management 25: 347-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R., 1977: Down By The Riverside: Informational Factors In Waterscape Preference, USDA Technical Report NC-28.

  • Kaplan R., Kaplan S. and Ryan R., 1998: With People In Mind. Island Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong L., Yuen B., Briffett C. and Sodhi N. 1997: Nature and nurture, danger and delight: Urban women's experiences of the natural world. Landscape Research 22: 245-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong L., Yuen B., Sodhi N. and Briffett C. 1999: The construction and experience of nature: Perspectives of urban youths. Tijdschrift voor Economie en Sociale Geografie 90(1): 3-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S. K. and Chua S. E., 1992: More Than A Garden City. Parks and Recreation Department, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostyn B. J., 1984: Personal Benefits and Satisfactions Derived From Participation in Urban Wildlife Projects. A qualitative evaluation undertaken by social and community planning research on behalf of the Nature Conservancy Council.

  • Noss R. F., 1983: A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. Bioscience 33: 700-706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oi K. H., 1998: Park connectors. In: Yuen B. (ed.), Planning Singapore: From Plan To Implementation. Singapore Institute of Planners, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penland S., 1987: Attitudes of urban residents towards avian species and species' attributes. In: Adams W. and Leedy D. L. (ed.), Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts D. C., 1994: The design of an urban open-space network for the City of Durban (South Africa). Environmental Conservation 21(1): 11-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde C. L. E. and Kendle A D., 1994: Human Well-being, Natural Landscapes and Wildlife in Urban Areas: A Review. English Nature, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rybzynski W., 1999: A Clearing in the Distance. Scribners, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders D. A. and Hobbs R. J., 1989: Corridors for Conservation. New Scientist: 63-68.

  • Smith N., 1990: Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton S. B., 1971: Civilizing American Cities. MIT Press.

  • Sodhi N. and Briffett C., 1996: Birds of park connectors in Singapore. Nature Malaysiana 21: 100-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas K., 1984: Man and the Natural World. Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuam Y. F., 1979: Thought and landscape. In: Reinig J. W. (ed.), The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Redevelopment Authority, 1991: Living The Next Lap. URA, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuen B., 1995: Open Space Use in Singapore. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Melbourne.

  • Yuen B., 1996: Creating the garden city: The Singapore Experience. Urban Studies 33(6): 955-970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yuen, B., Kong, L. & Briffett, C. Nature and the Singapore resident. GeoJournal 49, 323–331 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007060728210

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007060728210

Navigation