Sex Roles

, Volume 42, Issue 9–10, pp 807–823 | Cite as

Beliefs About the Causes of Four Types of Rape

  • Gloria Cowan
Article

Abstract

Beliefs about the causes of stranger, acquaintance, date, and partner rape and treatment and punishment for the types of rape were examined among college students. Three causes of rape—victim precipitation, male pathology, and male hostility—varied as a function of the type of rape, with female precipitation higher for partner and date rape than for acquaintance and stranger rape. Male hostility and male pathology were lowest for partner rape. These findings suggest that the perceived causes of rape that blame the perpetrator or victim, rather than societal or general causes of rape, vary with the type of rape. Recommended punishment varied directly with the closeness of the relationship. Additionally, gender differences and interactions of gender and ethnicity (Caucasian and Hispanics) were found across type of rape.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Behhofer, L., & Parrot, A. (1991). What is acquaintance rape? In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.). Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 9–25). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, S. T., Kuriloff, P. J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students' social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1719–1734.Google Scholar
  3. Bohmer, C., & Parrot, A. (1993). Sexual assault on campus: The problem and the solution. Toronto: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  4. Burt, M. R. (1991). Rape myths and acquaintance rape. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.). Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 26–40). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, L., & Lewis, D. (1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto: Women's Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cowan, G., & Campbell, R. R. (1995). Rape causal attitudes among adolescents. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 145–153.Google Scholar
  7. Cowan, G., & Quinton, W. J. (1997). Cognitive style and attitudinal correlates of the perceived causes of rape scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 227–245.Google Scholar
  8. Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape: How the legal system victimizes women who say no. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Feild, H. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156–179.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, G. J. (1987). Hispanic and majority student attitudes toward forcible date rape as a function of differences in attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 7, 93–101.Google Scholar
  11. Frazier, P., & Seales, L. (1997). Acquaintance rape is real rape. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women: Methological and personal perspectives (pp. 54–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Gerdes, E. P., Dammann, E. J., & Heilig, K. E. (1988). Perceptions of rape victims and assailants: Effects of physical attractiveness, acquaintance, and subject gender. Sex Roles, 19, 141–153.Google Scholar
  13. Giacopassi, D. J., & Dull, R. T. (1986). Gender and race differences in the acceptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 15, 67–75.Google Scholar
  14. Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1997). College women's fears and precautionary behaviors relating to acquaintance rape and stranger rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 527–548.Google Scholar
  15. Howard, J. A. (1988). A structural approach to sexual attitudes: Interracial patterns of adolescents' judgments about sexual intimacy. Sociological Perspectives, 31(1), 88–121.Google Scholar
  16. Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowlegment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 55–66.Google Scholar
  17. Koss, M. P., & Harvey, M. R. (991). The rape victim: Clinical and community interventions (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Koss, M. P., Dinero, T., Seibel, C., & Cox, S. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24.Google Scholar
  20. Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Brown, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  21. LaFree, G. D., Reskin, B. F., & Visher, C. A. (1985). Jurors' responses to victims' behavior and legal issues in sexual assault trials. Social Problems, 32, 389–407.Google Scholar
  22. Lefley, H. P., Scott, C. S., Llabre, M., & Hicks, D. (1993). Cultural beliefs about rape and victims' response in three ethnic groups. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63, 623–632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.Google Scholar
  24. Lottes, I. L. (1988). Sexual socialization and attitudes toward rape. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault II (pp. 194–220). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  25. Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L., Barnes, G., & Acker. M. (1995). Using the confluence model to predict men's conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353–369.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mechanic, M. B., Resick, P. A., & Griffin, M. G. (1994, November). Post-rape reactions: Does knowing the rapist make a difference? Paper presented at the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Parrot, A., & Bechholder, L. (Eds.) (1991). Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Sanday, P. R. (1993). A woman scorned: Acquaintance rape on trial. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  29. Searles, P., & Berger, R. J. (1987). The current states of rape reform legislation:An examination of state statutes. Women's Right Law Reporter, 10, 25–43.Google Scholar
  30. Stacy, R. D., Prisbell, M., & Tollefsrud, K. (1992). A comparison of attitudes among college students toward sexual violence committed by strangers and by acqauaintances:Aresearch report. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 18, 257–263.Google Scholar
  31. Tetreault, P., & Barnett, M. (1987). Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 353–355.Google Scholar
  32. Warshaw, R. (1988). I never called it rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  33. Williams, J. E., & Holmes, K. A. (1981). The second assault: Rape and public attitudes. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  34. World Bank (1993). World Development Report 1993: Investing in health. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gloria Cowan
    • 1
  1. 1.California State UniversitySan Bernardino

Personalised recommendations