Abstract
The paper presents the brief notes on some questionable points of modern magnetotellurics. These controversial points are: (1) nature and structure of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor, (2) magnetotelluric dispersion relations, (3) the magnetotelluric eigenstate problem, (4) separation of local and regional effects (the local-regional decomposition), (5) sensitivity of the TM and TE modes of the two-dimensional field, (6) robustness of the TM and TE modes, (7) identification and correction of the static shift, and (8) strategy of the two-dimensional interpretation: unimodal or bimodal inversion? Consideration of all these topics gives a better insight into problems and potentialities of magnetotellurics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bahr, K.: 1988, Interpretation of magnetotelluric impedance tensor: Regional induction and local telluric distortion, J. Geophys. 62, 119–127.
Berdichevsky, M. N. and Dmitriev, V.I.: 1976, Basic principles of interpretation of magnetotelluric sounding curves, in monograph “Geoelectric and Geothermal Studies”, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
Berdichevsky, M.N., Vanyan, L.L., and Dmitriev, V.I.: 1989, Methods used in the USSR to reduce near-surface inhomogeneity effects on deep magnetotelluric soundings, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 53, 194–206.
Berdichevsky, M.N., Koldaev, D.S., and Jakovlev, A.G.: 1992, Magnetotelluric sounding on the ocean coast, Izv. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, No. 6, 87–96.
Berdichevsky, M.N. and Dmitriev, V.I.: 1997, On deterministic nature of magnetotelluric impedance, Acta Geophysica Polonica XLV(3), 227–236.
Berdichevsky, M.N. and Pokhotelov, D.O.: 1997a, Dispersion relations in terms of a polarized medium, Physics of the Solid Earth 33(7), 539–542.
Berdichevsky, M.N. and Pokhotelov, D.O.: 1997b, Violation of the dispersion relations in a threedimensional magnetotellutic model, Physics of the Solid Earth 33(8), 603–612.
Berdichevsky, M.N., Dmitriev, V.I. and Pozdnjakova, E.E.: 1998, On two-dimensional interpretation of magnetotelluric soundings, Geophys. J. Int 133, 585–606.
Debabov, A.S.: 1980, On modelling of electromagnetic fields for heterogeneous media, DAN SSSR 250(2), 326–331.
Dyakonova, A.G., Ingerov, A.I., and Rokityansky, I.I.: 1986, Electromagnetic Soundings on the Eastern European Platform and in the Urals, Naukova Dumka, Kiev.
Egbert, G.: 1990, Comments on “concerning dispersion relations for the magnetotelluric impedance tensor” by E. Yee and K. Paulson, Geophys. J. Int 102, 1–8.
Eggers, D.E.: 1982, An eigenstate formulation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor, Geophysics 47, 1204–1214.
Fischer, G. and Schnegg, P.: 1980, The dispersion relations of the magnetotelluric response and their incidence on inverse problem, Geophys. J.R. Astr. Soc. 62, 661–673.
Fischer, G. and Schnegg, P.: 1993, The magnetotelluric dispersion relations over 2-D structures, Geophys. J. Int. 115, 1119–1123.
Groom, R.W. and Bailey, R.C.: 1989, Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tencors in the presence of local three-dimensional galvanic distortion, J. Geophys. Res. 94(B2), 1913–1925.
Jones, A. G.: 1988, Static shift of magnetotelluric data and its removal in a sedimentary basin enviroment, Geophysics 53(7), 967–978.
LaTorraca, G.A., Madden, T.E., and Korringa, J.: 1986, An analysis of magnetotelluric impedance for three-dimensional conductivity structures, Geophysics 51(9), 1819–1829.
Pellerin, L. and Hohman, G.W.: 1990, Transient electromagnetic inversion: A remedy for magnetotelluric static shift, Geophysics 55(9), 1242–1250.
Sims, W.E. and Bostick, F.X.: 1967, Methods of magnetotelluric analysis, Tech. rep. 58, Electr. Geophys. Res. Lab., Univ. of Texas.
Svetov, B.S.: 1991, Transfer functions of the electromagnetic field, Izv. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, No. 1, 119–128.
Swift, C.M.: 1967, A magnetotelluric investigation of an electrical conductivity anomaly in the southwestern United States, Ph.D., MIT, Cambridge.
Torres-Verdin, C. and Bostick, F. X.: 1992, Principles of spatial surface electric field filtering in magnetotellurics: Electromagnetic array profiling, Geophysics 57, 603–622.
Varentsov, I.M., Golubev, N.G., Gordienko, V.V., and Sokolova, E.J.: 1996, Study of deep geoelectrical structure along Lincoln line (project EMSLAB), Izv. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, No. 4, 124–144.
Wannamaker, P.E., Booker, J.R., Jones, A.G., Chave, A.D., Filloux, J. H., and Waff, H.S., and Law, L.K.: 1989, Resistivity cross-section through the Juan de Fuca subduction system and its tectonic implication, J. Geophys. Res. 94(B10), 14127–14144.
Wannamaker, P.E., Hohman, G.W., and Ward, S.H.: 1984, Magnetotelluric responses of three-dimensional bodies in layered earth, Geophysics 49(9), 1517–1533.
Wannamaker, P.E., Stodt, J.A., and Rijo, L.: 1987, A stable finite element solution for two-dimensional magnetotelluric modelling, Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc. 88, 277–296.
Weidelt, P.: 1972, The inverse problem of geomagnetic induction, Zeitschrift fur Geophysik 8(2), 257–290.
Weidelt, P. and Kaikkonen, P.: 1994, Local 1-D interpretation of magnetotelluric B-polarization impedance, Geophys. J. Int. 117, 733–748.
Yee, E. and Paulson, K.: 1987, The canonical decomposition and its relationships to other forms of magnetotelluric impedance tensor analysis, J. Geophys. 61, 173–189.
Yee, E. and Paulson, K.: 1988, Concerning dispersion relations for the magnetotelluric impedance tensor, Geophys. J. 95, 549–559.
Vozoff, K.: 1991, The magnetotelluric method, in monograph “Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics-Applications”, vol. 2, Soc. Explor. Geophys., Tulsa.
Zinger, B.Sh.: 1992, Correction for distortions of magnetotelluric fields: limits of validity and static approach, Surveys in Geophysics 13, 309–340.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berdichevsky, M. Marginal Notes On Magnetotellurics. Surveys in Geophysics 20, 341–375 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006645715819
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006645715819