Advertisement

Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 199–251 | Cite as

Optional Wh-Movement In Babine-Witsuwit'en

  • Kristin Denham
Article

Abstract

In this article, Iargue that the Athabaskanlanguage Babine-Witsuwit'enexhibits optional wh-movement.The optional fronting is shownnot to be due totopicalization, focus, or clefling.Optional movement is of theoretical interestbecause it is not permitted in theMinimalist Program. Derivations are comparedand only the most economical succeeds; thus,the optional movement outcome isnot expected, and accounting for trulyoptional movement becomes an interestingquestion. I solve this problem by allowingoptional selection of C from thelexicon. If C and its wh-featureappear in the numeration, it will promptraising of a wh-feature and itsaccompanying wh-phrase to check off thewh-feature in C. If C does notappear in the numeration, then nowh-movement takesplace. It is shown how this proposal canaccount for the position of wh-phrasesin simple, complex, and embedded questions, aswell as account for scope factsin Babine-Witsuwit'en. The role of C inother languages – its selection from thelexicon and the projection of Cby certain verbs – is also briefly discussed.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Movement Outcome Optional Movement Embed Question Optional Front 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey Li: 1993, 'Wh-elements in situ: Syntax or LF?', Linguistic Inquiry 24, 199–238.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, C. L.: 1970, 'Notes on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Question Morpheme', Foundations of Language 7, 197-219.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, Mark: 1996, The Polysynthesis Parameter, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Barss, Andrew, Ken Hale, Ellavina Perkins and Margaret Speas: 1992, 'Logical Form and Barriers in Navajo', in C.-T. James Huang and Robert May (eds), Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure: Cross-linguistic Perspectives, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 25-47.Google Scholar
  5. Benmamoun, Elabbas: 1991a, 'Do-support: Functional Categories-Representation and Derivation', unpublished manuscript, USC.Google Scholar
  6. Benmamoun, Elabbas: 1991b, 'On the Interaction between Wh-movement, Verb Movement, and the QuP Projection', unpublished manuscript, USC.Google Scholar
  7. Bresnan, Joan: 1972, Theory of Complementation in English Syntax, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  8. Cheng, Lisa: 1991, On the Typology of Wh-questions, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, Noam: 1973, 'Conditions on Transformations', in Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 232-286.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, Noam: 1993, 'A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory', in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1-52. Also published in Chomsky, 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, Noam: 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik: 1977, 'Filters and Control', Linguistic Inquiry 8, 425-504.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, Peter: 1983, 'Subjacency and Successive Cyclicity: Evidence from Ancash Quechua', Journal of Linguistic Research 2.4, 35-58.Google Scholar
  14. Cole, Peter and Gabriella Hermon: 1994a, 'Is There LF Wh-movement?', Linguistic Inquiry 25, 221-262.Google Scholar
  15. Cole, Peter and Gabriella Hermon: 1994b, 'Is Wh-in-situ Really in Situ?', in Raul Aranovich, William Byrne, Susanne Preuss and Martha Senturia (eds), The Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford Linguistics Association, pp. 189-204.Google Scholar
  16. Denham, Kristin: 1997, A Minimalist Account of Optional Wh-movement, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  17. Epstein, Samuel David: 1992, 'Derivational Constraints on A0-chain Formation', Linguistic Inquiry 23, 235-259.Google Scholar
  18. Kader, Mashudi: 1976. The Syntax of Malay Interrogatives, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  19. Katz, Jerrold and Paul Postal: 1964, An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  20. Kim, Soowon: 1989, 'Wh-phrases in Korean and Japanese Are QPs', MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11, 119-138.Google Scholar
  21. Kim, Soowon: 1991, Chain Scope and Quantification Structure, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
  22. Langacker, Ronald W.: 1965, 'French Interrogatives: A Transformational Description', Language 41, 587-600.Google Scholar
  23. Langacker, Ronald W.: 1972, 'French Interrogatives Revisited', in Jean Casagrande and Bohdan Saciuk (eds), Generative Studies in Romance Languages, Newbury House, Rowley, Massachusetts, pp. 36-69.Google Scholar
  24. Langer, Nils: 1995, 'Scrambling Is Not Optional', Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 125-145.Google Scholar
  25. Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito: 1984, 'On the Nature of Proper Government', Linguistic Inquiry 15, 235-290.Google Scholar
  26. McDaniel, Dana: 1989, 'Partial and Multiple Wh-movement', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7, 565-604.Google Scholar
  27. Miyagawa, Shigeru: 1997, 'Against Optional Scrambling', Linguistic Inquiry 28, 1-25.Google Scholar
  28. Pesetsky, David: 1987, 'Wh-in-situ: Movement and Unselective Binding', in Eric J. Reuland and Alice G. B. ter Meulen (eds), The Representation of Indefiniteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 98-129.Google Scholar
  29. Pesetsky, David: 1989, 'Language Particular Processes and the Earliness Principle', paper presented at the GLOW colloquium, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  30. Potter, Brian: 1997, Wh-indefinites and the Structure of the Clause in Western Apache, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
  31. Reis, Margaret and Inger Rosengren: 1992, 'What DoWH-Imperatives Tell Us about WH-movement?', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, 79-118.Google Scholar
  32. Rice, Keren: 1989, A Grammar of Slave, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  33. Rochemont, Michael and Leslie Saxon: 1993, 'surface Extraction of Adjuncts in Slave and the ECP', unpublished University of British Columbia and University of Victoria manuscript.Google Scholar
  34. Schauber, Ellen: 1979, The Syntax and Semantics of Questions in Navajo, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  35. Willie, Mary Ann: 1991, Pronouns and Obviation in Navajo, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristin Denham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishWestern Washington UniversityBellingham

Personalised recommendations