Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 59, Issue 3, pp 199–209 | Cite as

Effect of social housing condition on heat shock protein (HSP) expression in the Shionogi mouse mammary carcinoma (SC115)

  • Heather N. Andrews
  • Leslie R. Kerr
  • Karen S. Strange
  • Joanne T. Emerman
  • Joanne Weinberg

Abstract

Our previous studies have shown that social housing conditions can significantly alter the growth rate of the Shionogi mouse mammary carcinoma (SC115). The present study extended our investigations to the molecular level by examining stressor effects on the expression of a group of stress-responsive proteins, the heat shock proteins (HSPs). We hypothesized that HSP expression in SC115 cells may be altered by (a) different social housing conditions in vivo and (b) steroid hormone and growth factor exposure in vitro. Mice were reared in groups (G) or as individuals (I). Immediately following tumor cell injection, mice were rehoused from group to individual (GI), from individual to group (IG), or they remained in groups (GG). Tumor tissue was resected at 0.8 g or 3.0 g, as evidence suggests that tumor size affects HSP expression, which in turn affects proliferation. The data demonstrate that expression of HSP25, 70, and 90 was increased in tumors from mice in the IG compared to GG and GI mice, at both tumor weights examined. In addition, in IG mice, HSP90 expression was greater in 0.8 g compared to 3.0 g tumors. Under controlled culture conditions, hormones known to stimulate SC115 growth both in vivo and in vitro altered HSP expression. Physiological levels of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and pharmacological levels of hydrocortisone (HC) upregulated expression of HSP25, whereas physiological levels of β-estradiol (E2) upregulated expression of HSP90. These data are the first to demonstrate that a psychosocial stressor, a change in social housing condition, can induce differential HSP expression. Further, these data show that hormones that regulate SC115 tumor growth, also alter HSP expression.

heat shock proteins psychosocial stressors Shionogi mouse mammary carcinoma steroid hormones stress proteins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cooper CL, Cooper R, Faragher EB: Incidence and perception of psychosocial stress: the relationship with breast cancer. Psychol Med 19: 415–422, 1989Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gehde E, Baltrusch HJ: Early experience and development of cancer in later life: implications for psychoneuroimmunologic research. Int J Neurosci 51: 257–260, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scherg H., Cramer I, Blohmke M: Psychosocial factors and breast cancer: a critical reevaluation of established hypotheses. Cancer Detect Prev 4: 165–171, 1981Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scherg H., Blohmke M: Associations between selected life events and cancer. BMJ 14: 119–124, 1988Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramierez AJ, Craig TKJ, Watson JP, Fentiman IS, North WRS, Rubens RD: Stress relapse of breast cancer. BMJ 298: 291–293, 1989Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bartrop RW, Lazarus L, Lickhurst E, Likoh LG, Penny R: Depressed lymphocyte function after bereavement. Lancet 1: 834–836, 1989Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Irwin J, Ahluwalia P, Zacharko RM, Anisman H: Central norepinephrine and plasma corticosterone following acute and chronic stressors: influence of social isolation and handling. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24: 1151–1154, 1986Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hislop TG, Waxler NE, Coldman AJ, Elwood JM, Kan L: The prognostic significance of psychosocial factors in women with breast cancer. J Chronic Dis 40: 729–735, 1987Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ewertz M: Bereavement and breast cancer. Br J Cancer 53: 701–703, 1986Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Priestman TJ, Priestman SG. Bradshaw C: Stress and breast cancer. Br J Cancer 51: 493–498, 1985Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sklar LS, Anisman H: Social stress influences tumor growth. Psychosom Med 42: 347–365, 1980Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sklar LS, Anisman H: Stress and cancer. Psychol Bull 89: 369–406, 1981Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Justice A: Review of the effects of stress on cancer in laboratory animals: importance of time of stress application and type of tumor. Psychol Bull 98: 108–138, 1985Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amkraut A, Solomon GF: Stress and murine sarcoma virus (Moloney)-induced tumors. Cancer Res 32: 1428–1433, 1972Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burchfield SR, Woods SC, Elich MS: Effects of cold stress on tumor growth. Physiol Behav 21: 537–540, 1978Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riley V: Psychoneuroendocrine influences on immunocompetence and neoplasia. Science 212: 1100–1109, 1981Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riley V, Fitzmaurice MA, Spackman DH: Psychoneuroimmunologic factors in Neoplasia: studies in animals. In: Ader R (ed) Psychoneuroimmonology. Academic Press, New York, 1981, pp 31–101Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steplewski Z, Goldman PR, Vogel WH: Effect of housing stress on the formation and development of tumors in rats. Cancer Lett 34: 257–261, 1987Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruchovsky N, Rennie PS: Classification of dependent and autonomous variants of Shionogi mammary carcinoma based on heterogenous patterns of androgen binding. Cell 13: 273–280, 1978Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    King RBJ, Yates J: The use of cultured mammary tumor cells to study effects of steroid hormones. In: Richards RJ, Rajan KT (eds) Tissue Culture in Medical Research. Pergamin Press, New York, 1980, pp 221–227Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Emerman JT, Weinberg J: Influence of psychosocial stress on mammary tumor growth. In: Zinder O, Bresnitz S (eds) Molecular Biology Stress. UCLA Symposia, Vol 97, Alan R Liss, New York, 1989, pp 295–305Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weinberg J, Emerman JT: Effects of psychosocial stressors on mouse mammary tumor growth. Brain Behav Immun 3: 234–246, 1989Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grimm MS, Emerman JT, Weinberg J: Effects of social housing condition and behavior on growth of the Shionogi mouse mammary carcinoma. Physiol Behav 59: 633–642, 1996Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Noguchi S, Nishizawa Y, Nakamura N, Uchida N, Yamaguchi K, Sato B, Kitamura Y, Matsumoto K: Growth-stimulating effect of pharmacological doses of estrogen on androgendependent Shionogi carcinoma 115 in vivo but not in cell culture. Cancer Res 47: 263–268, 1987Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Omukai Y, Nakamura N, Hiraoka D, Nishizawa Y, Uchida N, Noguchi S, Sato B, Matsumoto K: Growth stimulating effect of pharmacological doses of glucocorticoid on androgenresponsive Shionogi carcinoma 115 in vivo in mice and in cell culture. Cancer Res 47: 4329–4334, 1987Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yates J, King RJ: Correlation of growth properties and morphology with hormone responsiveness of mammary tumor cells in culture. Cancer Res 41: 258–262, 1981Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fujita MQ, Yasui T, Sato B, Uchida N, Uchida K, Shiratori O, Takeda K, Matsumoto K: Maintenance of androgen-, glucocorticoid-, or estrogen-responsive growth in Shionogi carcinoma 115 subline sustained in castrated mice with high dose of estrogen for 30 generations (3 years). Japanese J Cancer Res 83: 995–1001, 1992Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lippman ME: Psychosocial factors and the hormonal regulation of tumor growth. In: Levy SM (ed) Behavior and Cancer. Jossey-Boss Publishers, San Francisco, 1985, pp 134–147Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pasqualini JR: Role of androgens in breast cancer. [Review] J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 45: 167–172, 1993Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Clifton KH: Animal models of breast cancer. In: Rose DP (ed) Endocrinology of Cancer. Vol 1, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1979, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nakamura N, Yamanishi H, Lu J, Uchida N, Nonomura N, Matsumoto K, Sato B: Growth stimulatory effects of androgen, high concentration of glucocorticoid or fibroblast growth factors on a cloned cell line from Shionogi carcinoma 115 cells in a serum-free medium. J Steroid Biochem 33: 13–18, 1989Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rajpert-De Metys E, Skakkenbaek NE: The possible role of sex hormones in the development of testicular cancer. Eur Urology 23: 54–59, 1993Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ueo H, Matsuko H, Sugimachi K, Kuwano H, Mon M, Akiyoshi T: Inhibitory effects of estrogen on the growth of human esophageal carcinoma cell line. Cancer Res 50: 7212–7215, 1990Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Grossman CJ, Roselle GA: The control of immune response by endocrine factors and the clinical significance of such regulation. Progress in Clin Biochem and Med 4: 9–56, 1987Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Axelrod J, Reisine TD: Stress hormones: their interaction and regulation. Science 224: 452–459, 1984Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Johnson EO, Kamilaris TC, Chrousos GP, Gold PW: Mechanisms of stress: a dynamic overview of hormonal and behavioral homeostasis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 16: 115–130, 1992Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rowse GJ, Weinberg J, Bellward GD, Emerman JT: Endocrine mediation of psychosocial stressor effects on mouse mammary tumor growth. Cancer Lett 65: 85–93, 1992Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jiang Y, Weinberg J, Wilkinson DA, Emerman JT: Effects of steroid hormones and opioid peptides on the growth of androgen-responsive Shionogi carcinoma (SC115) cells in primary culture. Cancer Res 53: 4224–4229, 1993Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Watanabe S, Nohno T, Omukai Y, Saito T, Senoo T: Stimulatory effects of dexamethasone and indomethacin on growth of androgen-dependent Shionogi carcinoma 115 in the mouse. Cancer Lett 16: 261–266, 1982Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tanaka A, Matsumoto K, Nishizawa Y, Lu J, Yamanishi H, Maeyama M, Nonomura N, Uchida N, Sato B: Growth stimulation by androgens, glucocorticoids or fibroblast growth factors and the blocking of the stimulated growth by antibody against basic fibroblast growth factor in protein-free culture of Shionogi carcinoma 115 cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 37: 23–29, 1990Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rowse GJ, Weinberg J, Emerman JT: Role of natural killer cells in psychosocial stressor-induced changes in mouse mammary tumor growth. Cancer Res 55: 17–622, 1995Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Welch WJ, Feramisco JR: Purification of the major mammalian heat shock proteins. J Biol Chem 257: 14949–14959, 1982Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Welch WJ: The role of heat-shock proteins as molecular chaperones. Curr Opin Cell Biol 3: 1033–1038, 1991Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Welch WJ: Mammalian stress response: cell physiology, structure/function of stress proteins, and implications for medicine and disease. Physiol Rev 72: 1063–1081, 1992Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schlesinger MJ: How the cell copes with stress and the function of heat shock proteins. Pediatr Res 36: 1–6, 1994Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Catelli MG, Binart N, Jung-Testas I, Renoir JM, Baulieu E, Feramisco JR, Welch WJ: The common 90-kd protein component of non-transformed 8S steroid receptors is a heat-shock protein. EMBO J 4: 3131–3135, 1985Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kost SL, Smith DF, Sullivan, WP, Welch WJ, Toft DO: Binding of heat shock proteins to the avian progesterone receptor. Mol Cell Biol 9: 3829–3838, 1989Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sanchez ER, Meshinchi S, Schlesinger MJ, Pratt WB: Demonstration that the 90-kilodalton heat shock protein is bound to the glucocorticoid receptor in its 9S nondeoxynucleic acid binding form. Mol Endocrinol 1: 908–912, 1987Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Picard D, Khursheed B, Garabedian MJ, Fortin MG, Lindquist S, Lindquist S, Yamamoto KR: Reduced levels of hsp90 compromise steroid receptor action in vivo. Nature 348: 166–168, 1990Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pratt WB, Dalman FC, Meshinchi S, Scherrer LC: The relationship between glucocorticoid receptor binding to Hsp90 and receptor function. Nippon Naibunpi Gakkai Zasshi-Folia Endocrinologica Japonica 66: 1185–1197, 1990Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Edwards DP, Estes PA, Fadok VA, Bona BJ, Onate S, Nordeen SK, Welch WJ: Heat shock alters the composition of heteromeric steroid receptor complexes and enchances receptor activity in vivo. Biochemistry 31: 2482–2491, 1992Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ferrarini M, Heltai S, Zocchi MR, Rugarli C: Unusual expression and localization of heat-shock proteins in human tumor cells. Int J Cancer 51: 613–619, 1992Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Srivastava PK: Heat shock proteins in immune response to cancer: the fourth paradigm. Experientia 50: 1054–1060, 1994Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tsuboi N, Ishikawa M, Tamura Y, Takayama S, Tobioka H, Matsuura A, Hirayoshi K, Nagata K, Sato N, Kikuchi K: Monoclonal antibody specifically reacting against 73-kilodalton heat shock cognate protein: possible expression on mammalian cell surface. Hybridoma 13: 373–381, 1994Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Multhoff G, Botzler C, Wiesnet M, Muller E, Meier T, Wilmanns W, Issels RD: A stress-inducible 73-kDa heat-shock protein (HSP72) is expressed on the surface of human tumor cells, but not on normal cells. Int J Cancer 61: 272–279, 1995Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Multhoff G, Botzler, C, Jennen L, Schmidt J, Ellwart J, Issels R: Heat shock protein 72 on tumor cells: a recognition structure for natural killer cells. J Immunol 158: 4341–4350, 1997Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ciocca DR, Fuqua SA, Lock-Lim S, Toft DO, Welch WJ, McGuire WL: Response of human breast cancer cells to heat shock and chemotherapeutic drugs. Cancer Res 52: 3648–3654, 1992Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ciocca DR, Oesterreich S, Chamness GC, McGuire WL, Fuqua SA: Biological aand clinical implications of heat shock protein 27, 000 (Hsp27): a review. JNCI 85: 1558–1570, 1993Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Oesterreich S, Weng CN, Qiu M, Hilsenbeck SG, Osborne CK, Fuqua SA: The small heat shock protein hsp27 is correlated with growth and drug resistance in human breast cancer cells lines. Cancer Res 53: 4443–4448, 1993Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Fuqua SA, Oesterreich S, Hilsenbeck SG, Von Hoffr DD, Eckardt J, Osborne CK: Heat shock proteins and drug resistance. Breast Cancer Res Treat 32: 67–71, 1994Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Simpson-Herrin L, Lloyd HH: Kinetic parameters and growth curves for experimental tumor systems. Cancer Chemother Rep 54: 143–174, 1970Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ritossa FM: A new puffing pattern induced by temperature shock and DNP in Drosophila. Experientia 18: 571–573, 1962Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193: 265–275, 1951Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Edwards DP, Estes PA, Fadok VA, Bona BJ, Onate SD, Nordeen SK, Welch WJ: Heat shock alters the composition of heteromeric steroid receptor complexes and enhances receptor activity in vivo. Biochemistry 31: 2482–2491, 1992Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Edwards DP, Adams DJ, Savage N, McGuire WL: Estrogen induced synthesis of specific proteins in human breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 93: 804–812, 1980Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Xu, Y, Lindquist S: Heat-shock protein hsp90 governs the activity of pp60v-src kinase. PNAS 90: 7074–7078, 1993Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Fuller KJ, Issels RD, Slosman DO, Guillet JG, Soussi T, Polla BS: Cancer and the heat shock response. Eur J Cancer 30A: 1884–1891, 1994Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rippman F, Taylor WR, Rothbard JB, Green NM: A hypothetical model for the peptide binding domain of hsp70 based on the binding domain of HLA. EMBO 10: 1053–1059, 1991Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ullrich SJ, Robinson EA, Law LW, Willingham M, Appela E: A mouse tumor-specific transplantation antigen is heat shockrelated. PNAS 83: 3121–3125, 1986Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Mahvi DM, Carper SW, Storm FK, Teal SR, Sondel PM: Overexpression of 27-kDa heat-shock protein inMCF-7 breast cancer cells: effects on lymphocyte-mediated killing by natural killer and gamma delta T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 37: 181–186, 1993Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sugawarma S, Nowicki M, Xie S, Song HJ, Dennert G: Effects of stress on lysability of tumor targets by cytotoxic T cells and tumor necrosis factor. J Immunol 145: 1991–1998, 1990Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Srivastava PK, Maki RG: Stress-induced proteins in immune response to cancer. Curr Topics Microbiol Immunol 167: 109–123, 1991Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Cai J, Henderson BW, Shen J, Subjeck JR: Induction of glucose regulated proteins during growth of a murine tumor. J Cell Physiol 154: 229–237, 1993Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lee AS, Bells J, Ting J: Biochemical characterization of the 94-and 78-kilodalton glucose-regulated proteins in Hamster Fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 259: 4616–4621, 1984Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ramachandran C, Catelli MG, Schneider W, Shyamala G: Estrogenic regulation of uterine 90-kilodalton heat shock protein. Endocrinology 123: 956–961, 1988Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Edwards DP, Adams DJ, McGuire WL: Estradiol stimulates synthesis of a major intracellular protein in a human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7). Breast Cancer Res Treat 1: 209–223, 1981Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather N. Andrews
    • 1
  • Leslie R. Kerr
    • 1
  • Karen S. Strange
    • 1
  • Joanne T. Emerman
    • 1
  • Joanne Weinberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations